Reuse of frying oil as an alternative to mitigate pollution of soil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820461Keywords:
Vegetable oil, Environmental Education, ReuseAbstract
This is a work on the vegetable oil used for frying in households , targeting the principles of Environmental Education and was developed with the intention of bringing students EJA ( Youth and Adults ) , an alternative to mitigate the impacts to the environment environment caused by this waste when disposed of improperly. From the data obtained through literature searches on the consumption of vegetable oil, the need to sensitize the community on the reuse of vegetable oil used in households for frying. Applied intervention in school Municipal Magda Ivana in 1st stage of 2nd segment of EJA night in Jaciara - MT. Given the stated objective of raising awareness about the damage caused to the environment by the use and improper disposal of vegetable oil, it could be concluded that the expected result was achieved to get the answers through a questionnaire administered to the students to end the educational intervention developed in school.Downloads
References
CAVALCANTE, M. B. Educação Ambiental: da escola a comunidade. Iº Congresso Brasileiro de Extensão Universitária, João Pessoa/PB, em 2002.
COSTA, M. P. Reciclando o lixo, reciclando a vida: uma experiência exitosa através da produção de vídeos. V EPEAL, Pesquisa em Educação: Desenvolvimento, Ética e Responsabilidade Social, Maceió/AL, 2010.
GODOY, P. O.; OLISKOVICZ, K.; BERNARDINO, V. M.; CHAVES, W. R.; PIVA, C. D.; RIGO, A. S. N. Consciência limpa: Reciclando o óleo de cozinha. Anuário da Produção de Iniciação Científica Discente, v.13, n.17, p.205-217, 2010.
KLAUCK, C. R. EDUCAÇÃO AMBIENTAL: Um elo entre conhecimento cientifico e comunidade, Revista Conhecimento Online, ano 1, v. 2, março 2010.
LOPES, R. C.; BALDIN, N. Educação ambiental para a reutilização do óleo de cozinha na produção de sabão – projeto “Ecolimpo”. In: Anais do IX Congresso Nacional de Educação (EDUCERE) – III Encontro Sul Brasileiro de Psicopedagogia. Paraná: PUC, 2009.
PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL DE JACIARA/MT. Secretaria de Educação, Cultura e Desporto de Jaciara. Projeto Político Pedagógico da Escola Municipal Magda Ivana, Reformulado em 2012.
RUA, E. R.; SOUZA, P. S. A. Educação Ambiental em uma Abordagem Interdisciplinar e Contextualizada por meio das Disciplinas Química e Estudos Regionais. Revista Química Nova Na Escola, v.32, n.2, p.95-100, 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.