Science Education: Evaluation of a Field class at school São Francisco de Assis in Jaciara/MT

Authors

  • César Silva de Oliveira Instituto Federal de Mato Grosso, Jaciara, MT
  • Fábio Henrique Oliveira Instituto Federal de Mato Grosso, Jaciara, MT
  • Edenar Souza Monteiro Universidade de Cuiabá, Cuiabá, MT

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820457

Keywords:

Science teaching, Experimental practice, Environment

Abstract

This study has aimed to review a pratical class with students of a public school from the city of Jaciara-MT. Considering many intrinsic aspects of the science subject on middle school, the subject in which the study is based off, while bringing the related aspects to the subject's content, glimpsed the teaching practice. The results serve as base to rethink the practice used by teachers in classroom. The idealized situations have got good results in order to influence a new teaching practice, where the student has been the main actor of their own learning. The presented results point that the practice helped on the building of critical, scientific and social knowledge, because the study goals have been drawn under the regional reality. This way, the approaching of students with their experienced reality has been the main branch that directed the study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AGUIAR, E.P.; TOURINHO. DISCUSSÕES METODOLÓGICAS: APERSPECTIVA QUALITATIVA NA PESQUISA SOBRE ENSINO/APRENDIZAGEM EM HISTÓRIA. Anais do XXVI Simpósio Nacional de História – ANPUH • São Paulo, julho 2011.

AZEVEDO, Maria. Ensino por investigação: problematizando as atividades em sala de aula. Ensino de Ciências: unindo a teoria e a prática. São Paulo, Pioneira Thomson Learning, 2004.

CASCINO, Fábio. Educação Ambiental: princípios, história, formação de professores. São Paulo: Editora Senac São Paulo, 1999.

MATOS, Deborah Dias. Aprendendo da prática : o ensino de ciências para crianças por meio de jogos e atividades experimentais / Deborah Dias Matos, Juliana Dias Matos.-- São Paulo : Porto de Ideias, 2012.

NARDI, Roberto. Questões atuais no ensino de Ciências / Roberto Nardi organizador.- 2. ed.- São Paulo: Escrituras Editora, 2009. - Educação para Ciência.Vários autores. PNNS. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais de Ciências Naturais.

PELIZZARI, Adriana et al. TEORIA DA APRENDIZAGEM SIGNIFICATIVASEGUNDO AUSUBEL. Rev. PEC, Curitiba, v.2, n.1, p.37-42, jul. 2001-jul. 2002. Disponível em:

SILVA, T.; LANDIN, M. AULAS PRÁTICAS NO ENSINO DE BIOLOGIA: ANÁLISE DA SUA UTILIZAÇÃO EM ESCOLAS NO MUNICÍPIO DE LAGARTO/S. Acesso em: 02 de março 2014.

VYGOTSKY, Lev. S. Pensamento e Linguagem. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2008.

WILSEK , Marilei A.Giodenis, TOSIN. João a. Puccin: Ensinar e Aprender Ciências no Ensino Fundamental com Atividades Investigativas através da Resolução de Problemas. Disponível em: .. Acesso em: 01 de outubro de 2014.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-19

How to Cite

Oliveira, C. S. de, Oliveira, F. H., & Monteiro, E. S. (2015). Science Education: Evaluation of a Field class at school São Francisco de Assis in Jaciara/MT. Monografias Ambientais, 14, 209–216. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820457

Issue

REMOA, V.14, 2015, ESPECIAL EDITION: LICENCIATURA EM CIÊNCIAS DA NATUREZA - IFMT – MT

Section

ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATIVE PRACTICES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Most read articles by the same author(s)