Study of the Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management of Cotiporã – RS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130819134

Keywords:

Sanitation, National policy of solid waste (NPSW), Sustainability

Abstract

The disorderly urban growth has caused a number of environmental impacts and concerns among the population and their managers. The challenge of urban sustainability has come to occupy a prominent role among the strategic priorities in the environmental agencies of the country. Seeking to minimize the environmental, social, economic impacts and to transform the current environmental scenario, the law 12.305/10 that institutes the National Policy of Solid Waste (NPSW), establishes the obligatoriness of elaborating plans for the Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management (IMSWMRS). In order to adapt to the law, the City of Cotiporã/RS elaborated its IMSWM in 2012, it is from this that we perform a technical and bibliographical study, providing an analysis in order to establish a better progress of goals and actions performed fulfilling to the Plan. We conducted documentary research IMSWM and in situ diagnosis of the current situation of the management of Solid Waste, after the implementation of the Plan. It can be seen that the government is making efforts to fulfill the plan. The proposed technical recommendations may be revised in the continuing implementation of IMSWMRS and incorporated to the actions already being carried out, providing continuous improvement, adaptation and adequacy of the Plan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Edenara de Marco, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS

Mestra em Agronomia pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sistemas de Produção Agrícola Familiar - UFPel. Engenheira Ambiental e Sanitarista formada pela UFPel.

Luciara Bilhalva Corrêa, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS

Possui graduação em Economia Doméstica pela Universidade Federal de Pelotas. Mestrado em Educação Ambiental pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande. Doutorado em Educação Ambiental pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande.

References

ABRELPE. Panorama dos Resíduos Sólidos no Brasil. São Paulo, 2012. 116p. Disponível em: http://www.abrelpe.org.br/Panorama/panorama2012.pdf. Acesso em: 26 de setembro de 2015.

ABRELPE. Panorama dos Resíduos Sólidos no Brasil. São Paulo, 2014. 120p. Disponível em: http://www.abrelpe.org.br/Panorama/panorama2014.pdf. Acesso em: 26 de setembro de 2015.

AQUINO, I. F. Proposição de uma rede de associações de catadores na região da grande Florianópolis: Alternativas de agregação de valor aos materiais recicláveis. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Ambiental) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2007.

BRASIL. Congresso. Senado. Decreto Nº 7.404, De 2010. Regulamenta a Lei N.º 12.305, De 2010. Coleção de Leis Da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF, de 2 de Ago. 2010. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2010/decreto/d7404.htm. Acesso em: 26 de setembro de 2015.

BRASIL. Coord. André Vilhena. Guia Da Coleta Seletiva De Lixo. Texto e Coordenação: André Vilhena; Ilustrações: Sandro Falsetti –– São Paulo: Cempre - Compromisso Empresarial Para Reciclagem, 2013.

BRASIL. Plano Municipal de Gestão Integrada De Resíduos Sólidos. Cotiporã, 2012.

CEMPRE. Coord. André Vilhena. Lixo Municipal: Manual de Gerenciamento Integrado. Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnológicas (Ipt)/Cempre, São Paulo, 2000.

INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA – IBGE. Cidades@. Disponível Em: http://cidades.ibge.gov.br/painel/painel.php?lang=&codmun=430595&search=|cotipora. Acesso em: 26 de setembro de 2015.

LOUREIRO, D. C.; AQUINO, A. M.; ZONTA, E.; LIMA, E. Compostagem e Vermicompostagem De Resíduos Domiciliar E Com Esterco Bovino Para A Produção De Insumo Orgânico. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, Vol. 42, Nº.7, P.1043-1048, Jul. 2007.

MANO, E. B.; PACHECO, É. B. A. V.; BONELLI, C. M. C. Meio Ambiente, Poluição E Reciclagem. Engenharia Sanitária Ambiental, Vol.15, N.4, 2010.

MONTEIRO, J. H. P.; ZVEIBIL, V. Z.. Manual De Gerenciamento Integrado De Resíduos Sólidos. Rio De Janeiro: Ibam, 2001.

PESSIN, N.; CONTO, S. M.; TELH, M.; CADORE, J.; ROVATTI, D.; BOFF, R. E. Composição Gravimétrica De Resíduos Sólidos Urbanos: Estudo De Caso – Município De Canela – Rs. Congreso Interamericano De Ingeniería Sanitaria Y Ambiental, 30. Anais... Punta Del Este, 26-30 Nov. 2006. Disponível em:http://www.bvsde.paho.org/bvsaidis/uruguay30/BR05416_Pessin.pdf. Acesso em: 26 de setembro de 2015.

RIBEIRO, Túlio F.; LIMA, Samuel C.. Coleta Seletiva De Lixo Domiciliar – Estudos De Caso. Caminhos Da Geografia, Vol.1dez/2000.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-28

How to Cite

Marco, E. de, & Corrêa, L. B. (2015). Study of the Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management of Cotiporã – RS. Monografias Ambientais, 14(3), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130819134

Issue

REMOA, V. 14, N. 3, SEPT.-DEC., 2015

Section

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Most read articles by the same author(s)