Analysis content as tool for construction of environmental education of the family ranchers the Alto Camaquã
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130818377Keywords:
Social representation, Environmental education, Alto CamaquãAbstract
A key feature of familiar livestock of Alto Camaquã is its dependence by natural resources. The use of these resources needs more conscious strategies by parts of local actors. Thus, we attempted to in this study to understand the representations of local communities. For that, it constructs an ‘ideal’ conceptual model and a screenplay of qualitative interview. The methodologies of social investigation used are analysis of content and fundaments from the theory of social representation by Serge Moscovici and from social qualitative research by Marília Cecilia Minayo. The analysis of results provides to know the potencialities and difficulties before methodologies of environmental education, lately, the ideas and perceptions, representations of ranchers about management countryside and water, hybrid shortage, water and life quality and the influence in the livestock production were diagnosed. The ideas of flexibility to several educational practices, experience in the countryside with aggregations of emotional feelings of fear and sadness, were some characteristics in social representations from familiar ranchers.Downloads
References
BARDIN, L. Análise de Conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70, 1978.
BORBA, M. La Marginalid como potencial para laconstrucción de otro "Desarrollo”: El caso de Santana da Boa Vista, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Doutorado em Sociologia, Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, na Universidade de Córdoba, em 2002.
CALLON, M. Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: LAW, J. (Comp.). Power, Action and Belief.A New Sociology of
Knowledge? London: Routledge& Regan Paul, 1986a, p. 196-223.
CAPRA, F. A teia da vida: uma nova compreensão científica dos sistemas vivos. São Paulo: Cultrix, 1996, 256 p.
CARVALHO, C. M.; BORBA, M. F. S. Avaliação das nascentes do território do Alto Camaquã/RS.Resumo Simples. Congrega, 2012.
CHRISTOFOLETTI, A. Modelagem de sistemas ambientais. São Paulo: Edgard Blucher, 1999, 236 p.
CPRM. Companhia de pesquisa de Recursos Minerais. Mapa Hidrogeológico do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Disponível em: http://www.cprm.gov.br. Acesso em: 17.mar.2014.
CRESWELL, J. W. Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. Tradução Magda Lopes, 3. ed., Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2010, 296 p.
DADALT,L.P. Padrões de diversidade da vegetação lenhosa da região do Alto Camaquã, Rio Grande do Sul. Dissertação (mestrado) Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2010.
FIGUEIRÓ, A. S.; SELL, J. C.; LOSEKANN, M. B.; DEGRANDI S. M. Compreensão da paisagem do Alto Camaquã: debate ambiental sobre o bioma pampa. Mercator, Fortaleza, v. 10, n. 23, p. 147-158,
set./dez. 2011.
FREIRE, P. Educação e Mudança. 8. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1984, 79p.
GIL, A. C. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2006, 206p.
GUIMARÃES, M. Educação Ambiental. Duque de Caxias: Ed. Unigranrio, 2000.LEFEBVRE, H. A vida cotidiana no mundo moderno. São Paulo: Ática, 1991.
LEFEBVRE, H. A vida cotidiana no mundo moderno. São Paulo: Ática, 1991.MINAYO, Maria Cecília de Souza (org.). Pesquisa social: teoria, método e criatividade.29. ed. 2004.
MINAYO, Maria Cecília de Souza (org.). Pesquisa social: teoria, método e criatividade.29. ed. 2004.MOSCOVICI, S. Representações sociais: investigações em psicologia social. 8. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes,
404 p.
NESKE, M. Z. Estilos de agricultura e dinâmicas locais de desenvolvimento rural: o caso da pecuária familiar no território do Alto Camaquã do Rio Grande do Sul. 2009. 208 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Desenvolvimento Rural) -Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2009.
OVERBECK, G. E. et. al. Os campos sulinos: um bioma negligenciado. In: PILLAR, V.P. [et. al]. Editores. Campos Sulinos: conservação e uso sustentável da biodiversidade. Ministério do Meio
Ambiente-MMA, 2p. 24-41, 2009.
REIS, S. L. de A.; BELLINI, M. Representações sociais: teoria, procedimentos metodológicos e educação ambiental. ActaScientiarum.Human and Social Sciences.Maringá, v. 33, n. 2, p. 149-159, 2011.
RIBEIRO, C. M. Estudo do modo de vida dos pecuaristas familiares da região da campanha do Rio Grande do Sul. 2009. 304 f. Tese (Doutorado em Desenvolvimento Rural). Programa de PósGraduação em Desenvolvimento Rural, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2009.
RICHARDSON, R. J. Pesquisa Social: métodos e técnicas.3.ed. São Paulo: Atlas: 1999.
SACHS, I. Population, developpementetemploi. Toulouse, Revue Internationale dês Sciences Sociales, n. 141, p. 409-426, Unesco/Erès, 1994.
SATO, M. Educação Ambiental. São Carlos: RiMa, 2004.
TRINDADE, J. P. P.; BORBA M. F. S.; LEFEVBRE, J. Território do Alto Camaquã: apresentação da cobertura vegetal do Alto Camaquã: junho de 2007. Bagé: Embrapa Pecuária Sul, 2010b, 13 p. (Embrapa Pecuária Sul. Documentos, 107).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
