Evaluation of Environmental Education Themes in Chemistry Books of the Textbook National Plan (PNLD)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130815141Keywords:
Environmental Education, TextbooksAnalysis, PNLD booksAbstract
The concern about environmental issues has generated discussions in different teaching levels and also on the media, which constantly alert for the environmental problems, climate change and catastrophies. Environmental Education (EE) must be worked with in high school as a transversal theme, helping the student to have a broader comprehension about the environmental problems which have been so much discussed nowadays. Thus, this work aims to evaluate the chemistry textbooks suggested by the Textbook National Plan (PNLD) of the period 2012-2014, in terms of the Environmental Education theme and its appropriateness in high school. The subjects evaluated were the following: (i) use of chlorofluorocarbons and ozone layer; (ii) greenhouse effect and global warming; (iii) acid rain and water: pollution and treatment. Three categories of analysis were devised, aiming to guide the research in the most relevant aspects for the chemistry knowledge to be studied in classroom. The three categories are: (i) theoretical explanation of the subject; (ii) comprehension of the subject and (iii) exercises suggested. According to the analysis, it was observed that the chemistry PNLD textbooks are adequate for the practice of such themes when studied in classroom in relation to the chemistry contents.
Downloads
References
BARDIN, L. Análise de Conteúdo. Edição Revista e Ampliada, Edições 70, 2011.
CUBA, M. A. Educação Ambiental nas escolas. ECCOM, v. 1, nº 2, jul/dez, 2010.
CURSINO, A. C T.; SOUZA, R. T.; HARACEMIV, S. M. C.; BARBOZA, L. M. V. Análise do livro didático “Folhas” no Ensino de Química. In: X VI Encontro de Química da Região Sul (16-SBQ Sul), Anais..., Blumenau, 2008.
EDUCAÇÃO NA MÍDIA. Opinião: o papel do livro didático. Disponível em: http://www.todospelaeducacao.org.br/comunicacao-e-midia/educacao-na-midia/26006/opiniao-o-papel-do-livro-didatico/. Acesso em: 27/01/2014
FRISON, M. D, et al. Livro didático como instrumento de apoio para a construção de propostas de Ensino de Ciências Naturais. Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências. Florianópolis, novembro de 2009.
GUIA DO LIVRO DIDÁTICO: Disponível em: http://www.fnde.gov.br/programas/livro-didatico/guiado-livro/item/2988-guia-pnld-2012-ensino-m%C3%A9dio.
JACOBI, P. Educação Ambiental, cidadania e sustentabilidade, Cadernos de pesquisa, n. 118, p. 189 – 205, São Paulo, 2003.
LISBOA, J. C. Ser Protagonista – Química 1º ano – Ensino Médio. Edições SM, volume 1, São Paulo, 2010.
____________. Ser Protagonista – Química 2º ano – Ensino Médio. Edições SM, volume 2, São Paulo, 2010.
____________. Ser Protagonista – Química 3º ano – Ensino Médio. Edições SM, volume 3, São Paulo, 2010.
MAIA, J. de O, et al. O Livro Didático de Química nas Concepções de Professores de Química do Ensino Médio da Região Sul da Bahia. Química Nova na Escola, vol. 33, Nº 2, maio 2011.
MANTOVANI, K. P. O programa Nacional do Livro Didático – PNLD Impactos na Qualidade do Ensino público. Dissertação de Mestrado, USP, 2009.
MIRANDA, S. R; DE LUCA, T. R. O livro de História hoje: um panorama a partir do PNLD. Revista Brasileira de História, vol 24, nº 48, são Paulo, 2004.
MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE. Disponível em: www.protocolodemontreal.org.br/005/00502001.asp?ttCD_CHAVE = 17525.
MORTIMER, E. F; MACHADO, A. H. Química: Ensino Médio. Editora Scipione, volume 1, São Paulo, 2011.
________________________________. Química: Ensino Médio. Editora Scipione, volume 2, São Paulo, 2011.
________________________________. Química: Ensino Médio. Editora Scipione, volume 3, São Paulo, 2011.
SANTOS, W; MÓL, G. Química Cidadã. Editora nova geração, volume 1, São Paulo, 2010.
___________________. Química Cidadã. Editora nova geração, volume 2, São Paulo, 2010.
___________________. Química Cidadã. Editora nova geração, volume 3, São Paulo, 2010.
REIS, M. Química – Meio ambiente, Cidadania, Tecnologia. FTD, volume 1, São Paulo, 2010.
________ Química – Meio ambiente, Cidadania, Tecnologia. FTD, volume 2, São Paulo, 2010.
________ Química – Meio ambiente, Cidadania, Tecnologia. FTD, volume 3, São Paulo, 2010.
RODRIGUES, M.H. e FREITAS, N.K. O livro didático ao longo do tempo: a forma do conteúdo.Pesquisa, v. 3, p. 26-33, 2008.
PERUZZO, F. F; CANTO, E. L. Química na abordagem do cotidiano – Química geral e Inorgânica. Moderna, volume 1, 4ª edição, São Paulo, 2010.
___________________________. Química na abordagem do cotidiano – Físico - Química. Moderna, volume 2, 4ª edição, São Paulo, 2010.
___________________________. Química na abordagem do cotidiano – Química Orgânica I. Moderna, volume 3, 4ª edição, São Paulo, 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
