Quantification of waste generation in a flour mill in the state of Paraíba
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130814984Keywords:
Flour mills, Waste, The environment, Use of wasteAbstract
The study was conducted in a flour mill, with mechanized process, located on the Site, Tea Garden in the City of Sand, state of Paraíba, northeastern Brazil. The objective was to evaluate the generation of solid and liquid waste at each stage in processing of cassava roots and present alternatives for reuse of the main byproducts. In the conditions in which they developed the study it was clear that the agro-industrial processes processing of cassava for the production of table flour, generate quite a significant amount of waste. It was concluded that the house studied flour generates a large quantity of waste that could be used, since almost all are made up of easy and basically viable putrescible organic matter to be processed and utilized by farmers in the locality of the project. And that waste management in the processing of cassava proceedings become necessary, as these have very high pollutant loads, and most often discarded into the environment without any technical control may cause damage to natural resources and public health.
Downloads
References
CARDOSO, É. Uso de Manipueira Como Biofertilizante no Cultivo do Milho: avaliação do efeito no solo, nas águas subterrâneas e na produtividade do milho. 2005. 67p. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Programa de Pósgraduação em Ciências Ambientais, da Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma.
CARDOSO, C. E. L.; SOUZA, J. S. Importância, Potencialidades e Perspectivas do Cultivo da Mandioca na América Latina. In: CEREDA, M. P (coord): Agricultura: Tuberosas Amiláceas Latino Americanas. V. 2. São Paulo: Fundação Cargill, 2002. p. 29 - 47.
CEREDA, M. P. Caracterização dos subprodutos da industrialização da mandioca. In: CEREDA, M. P (coord): Manejo, Uso e Tratamento de Subprodutos da Industrialização da Mandioca. V.4. São Paulo: Fundação Cargill, 2001. p. 13 – 37.
CEREDA, M. P. Valorização de Subprodutos como Forma de Reduzir Custos de Produção. In: CEREDA, M. P (coord): Manejo, Uso e Tratamento de Subprodutos da Industrialização da Mandioca. V. 4. São Paulo: Fundação Cargill, 2001. p. 305 – 320.
FIORETTO, R. A. Uso direto da manipueira em fertirrigação. In: CEREDA, M. P (coord): Manejo, Uso e Tratamento de Subprodutos da Industrialização da Mandioca. V. 4. São Paulo: Fundação Cargill, 2001. p. 67– 79.
INOUE, K. R. A. Produção de Biogás, Caracterização e Aproveitamento Agrícola do Biofertilizante Obtido na Digestão da Manipueira. 2008. 92p. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Programa de Pós- Graduação em Engenharia Agrícola, da Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG.
PANTAROTO, S.; CEREDA, M. P. Linamarina e sua Decomposição no Ambiente. In: CEREDA, M.P (coord): Manejo, Uso e Tratamento de Subprodutos da Industrialização da Mandioca. V. 4 São Paulo: Fundação Cargill, 2001. p. 39 – 47.
SOARES, M. O. S. Sistema de Produção em Casas de Farinha: uma leitura descritiva na comunidade de Campinhos – Vitória da Conquista (BA). 2007. 115p. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Programa Regional de Pós-graduação em Desenvolvimento Regional e Meio Ambiente, da Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, BA.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
