Study of urban socio-environmental image of Foz do Iguaçu-PR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130814962Keywords:
Foz do Iguaçu, Environmental Perception, Environmental EducationAbstract
Foz do Iguacu, a large municipality located in western Parana State, has one of the seven wonders of nature and is among the most visited tourist Brazilian cities. The objective of this work was to study the socio-environmental image of the city through environmental awareness of inhabitants of the municipality. Data collection occurred in 2012 through a questionnaire and interview 162 questionnaires being applied to residents of many neighborhoods located in the urban area of the city of Foz do Iguaçu. The results enabled the study of socio-environmental image, establishing the pleasant and unpleasant landscapes, objects and realize that these singularities in the city and the neighborhoods where they live. Respondents believe in the importance of preserving the environment, where the majority conceives the environment as green areas and forests and consider the preservation, landscapes, parks and environmental quality of the city as disabled.
Downloads
References
ARAÚJO, J. L; BORBA, M. C. Pesquisa Qualitativa em Educação Matemática. 2. ed. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2004.
BERTOLINE, G. R. F.; POSSAMAI, O.; BRANDALISE, L. T. A Percepção dos consumidores de produtos ecologicamente corretos: estudo de caso em pequena empresa. Revista da Micro e Pequena Empresa, Campo Limpo Paulista, v. 3, n. 2, p. 99-119, 2009.
BRANDALISE, L. T. et al. A percepção e o comportamento ambiental dos universitários com relação ao grau de educação ambiental. Revista Gestão da Produção. v. 16, n. 2, p. 273-285, 2009.
BRASIL. Lei nº 9795, de 27 de abril de 1999. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, 28 abr. 1999. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/L9795.htm. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2012.
CASTRO, F.D.; SILVA, V. P.; SILVA, A. B. Percepção ambiental de donas de casa de Guaramaré/RN quanto a produção de petróleo e qualidade de vida. In: IV Congresso de Pesquisa e Inovação da Rede Norte e Nordeste da Educação Tecnológica. Belém, 2009. Disponível em: http://www.ufrgs.br/seerbio/ojs/index.php/rbb/article/view/1178. Acesso em: 9 jul. 2012.
FAGNANI, J. P. Foz do Iguaçu: maravilha da natureza. Curitiba: Natugraf, 2010.
FERNANDES, R. S. et al. O uso da percepção ambiental como instrumento de gestão em aplicações ligadas às áreas educacional, social e ambiental. In: Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Campo Grande: ABES, p. 1-5, 2005.
FERREIRA, I. C. R. Os impactos sociais, econômicos e culturais do turismo em Guaramiranga-CE. Revista Turismo, 2006. Disponível em: http://www.revistaturismo.com.br/artigos/guaramiranga.html. Acesso em: 25/01/2014
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. Cidades – Foz do Iguaçu. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/painel/painel.php?codmun=410830. Acesso em: 9 set. 2012.
LIMA, Perci. Foz do Iguaçu: no contexto da história. Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná: ed. do autor, 2010.
LYNCH, K. A imagem da cidade. Lisboa: ed. Edições 70, 1999.
MALAFAIA, Guilherme. RODRIGUES, A. S. de L. Percepção ambiental de jovens e adultos de uma escola de ensino fundamental. Revista Brasileira de Biociências. Porto Alegre, v. 7, n. 3, p. 266-274, 2009.
MILLER JR, G. T. Ciência Ambiental. São Paulo: Cengage Learning, 2008.
PEDRINI, A.; COSTA, E. A.; GHILARDI, N. Percepção ambiental de crianças e pré-adolescentes em vulnerabilidade social para projetos de educação ambiental. Revista Ciência & Educação, vol. 16, n. 1, p. 164-179, 2010.
PHILIPPI JR, A. PELICIONI, M. C. F. Educação Ambiental e sustentabilidade, Barueri: Manole, 2005.
PHILIPPI JR, A.; ROMÉRO, M. A.; BRUNA, G. C. Curso de gestão ambiental. Barueri: Manole, 2004.
RUSCHEINSKY, A. Educação Ambiental: Abordagens Múltiplas. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2002.
SABOYA, R. Kevin Lynch e a imagem da cidade. Urbanidades, 2008. Disponível em: http://urbanidades.arq.br/2008/03/kevin-lynch-e-a-imagem-da-cidade/. Acesso em: 25/01/2014
VILLAR, L. M et al. A Percepção Ambiental entre os Habitantes da Região Noroeste do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Revista de Enfermagem Escola Anna Nery, v. 12, 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
