Growing of sunflower on varieties of substrates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130813536Keywords:
Solid waste, Sustainable, Coconut fiber, AG262Abstract
The use of solid wastes as substrates can provide components for cost reduction in the production of seedlings . In this context , the research was conducted in a greenhouse at the Federal University of Campina Grande - UFCG , aiming to assess the cultivation of sunflower in different substrate compositions derived from agribusinesses . The treatments were : T1 ) Coconut Fiber ( 100 % ) ; T2 ) Coconut Fiber ( 50 % ) + sand ( 50 % ), T3 ) bagasse cane sugar ( 100 % ) and T4 ) Sand ( 100 % ) . A variety of sunflower used for the survey was 262 AG . ‘s Growth parameters were stem diameter ( DC ) , plant height ( PH) and the number of leaves (NL ) . It was found that the first review by the number of leaves, plant height and stem diameter were significant at 2.5 , 19.2 and 0.1 , respectively. The largest diameters of treatment 1 were all then reviews the T2 . In third evaluation in treatment 4 had higher values at the variables NF ALP than in T3. Coir had great results and the use of substrates from agribusiness is becoming viable sustainable production. these , the effectiveness of ME in Brazil and different scenarios that may benefit the environment.Downloads
References
BISCARO, G. A.; MACHADO, J. R.; TOSTA, M. da S.; MENDONÇA, V.; SORATTO, R. P.; CARRIJO, O.A; LIZ, R.S; MAKISHIMA, N. 2002. Fibra da casca do coco verde como substrato agrícola. Horticultura Brasileira 20: 533-535.
BRITO, K. S. A.; SILVA, V. F.; CARDOSO, J. A. F.; SILVA, E. L.; BARACUHY, J. G. V. Fitomassa de girassóis cultivados em diversos substratos provenientes de resíduos agroindustriais. 7º Congresso de Educação Agrícola Superior e 52ª REUNIÃO ANUAL DA ABEAS. Juazeiro- BA, 2012.
BRITO, K. S. A.; SILVA, V. F.; NASCIMENTO, E. C.; ANDRADE, L. O.; LIMA, V. A.Utilização de água residuária no cultivo de mudas de girassol ornamental em diversos substratos. XLII Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia Agrícola - CONBEA 2013. Fábrica de Negócios - Fortaleza - CE - Brasil 04 a 08 de agosto de 2013.
BRITO, K. S. A.; SILVA, V. F.; SILVA, E. L.; BRITO, B. M. A.; BARACUHY, J. G. V. Crescimento de girassóis cultivados em substratos provenientes de resíduos sólidos agroindustriais. Encontro nacional de educação, ciência e tecnologia/uepb, 2012..
CARRIJO, O.A; LIZ, R.S; MAKISHIMA, N. Fibra da casca do coco verde como substrato agrícola. Horticultura Brasileira 20: 533-535. 2002.
FIGUEIREDO, G. R. G.; ANDRADE, L. O.; BATISTA, D. S.; FARIAS, G. A.; NOBRE, R. G.; RÊGO, E. R. “Produção de mudas de girassol ornamental (Helianthusannuus L. cv. Dobrado Sungold) em diferentes substratos”. Revista Educação Agrícola Superior. Associação Brasileira de Educação Agrícola SuperiorABEAS - v.23, n.1,p.105-107, 2008.
JOÃO, I.S. 2009. Impacto Ambiental e Gestão de Resíduos na Agroindústria Canavieira: o Caso do Aproveitamento do Bagaço da Cana para Geração de Energia Elétrica. XI Encontro Nacional e I Encontro Internacional sobre Gestão Empresarial e Meio Ambiente.
KARADOðAN, T.; AKGUN, Í. 2009.Effect of leaf removal on sunflower yield and yield components and some quality characters. Helia, v.32, p.123-134.
LEMAIRE, P. Physical, chemical and biological properties of growing medium. Acta Horticulturae, v. 396, n. 01, p. 273-284, 1995.
LIMA JUNIOR, I.S. de; BERTONCELLO, T. F.; MELO, E. P. de; DEGRANDE, P. E.; KODAMA, C. 2010. Desfolha artificial simulando danos de pragas na cultura do girassol (Helianthus annuus L., Asteraceae). Revista Ceres, v.57, p.23-27.
OLIVEIRA, A. B; HERNANDEZ, F. F.; JUNIOR ASSIS, R. N. Pó de coco verde, uma alternativa de substrato na produção de mudas de berinjela. Rev. Ciên. Agron., Fortaleza, v. 39, n. 01, p. 39-44, Jan.- Mar., 2008.
ROSA, M. F.; BEZERRA, F. C. Caracterização do pó da casca de coco usado como substrato agrícola. Fortaleza: Embrapa Agroindustrial Tropical, 2001. 6 p. (Comunicado Técnico, 54).
ROSA, M. F.; BEZERRA, F. C. Utilização do pó da casca de coco verde como substrato para produção de mudas de alface. Fortaleza: Embrapa Agroindustrial Tropical, 2002. 4 p. (Comunicado Técnico, 71).
SANTOS, J. A. J; FILHO GUEDES, D.H; GHEYI, H R; DIAS, N.S; MEDEIROS, S.S. 2012. Nitrogênio e água residuária na emergência do girassol cultivado em sistema hidropônico com diferentes substratos. IV Workshop Internacional de Inovações Tecnológicas na Irrigação. Fortaleza-CE. 2012.
SILVEIRA EB; RODRIGUES VJLB; GOMES AMA; MARIANO RLR; MESQUITA JCP. 2002. Pó de coco como substrato para produção de mudas de tomateiro. Horticultura Brasileira 20: 211-216.
TOMICH, T. R.; RODRIGUES, J. A. S.; GONÇALVES, L. C.; TOMICH, R. G. P. CARVALHO, A. U. 2003. Potencial forrageiro de cultivares de girassol produzidos na safrinha para ensilagem. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, v.55, p.756-762.
VALERI, S.V.; CORRADINI, L. Fertilização em viveiro para produção de mudas de Eucalyptus e Pinus. In: GONÇALVES, J.L.M.; BENEDETTI, V. Nutrição e fertilização florestal. Piracicaba: IPEF, 2000. p.168-190.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
