O programa de monitoramento da biodiversidade e do uso sustentável de recursos naturais –ProBUC – como alternativa de monitoramento comunitário amazônico

Authors

  • Daniel Carneiro Costa Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, AM
  • Guillaume Antoine Marchand Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, AM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130813498

Keywords:

Monitoramento comunitário, ProBUC, Gestão de unidades de conservação, Populações locais

Abstract

The ProBUC - monitoring program of biodiversity and the sustainable use of natural resources - is presented in this paper as a methodological innovation in the process of community monitoring in the state of Amazonas. Its appearance is intended to subsidize the management of Amazonian state conservation units. This requirement results in a larger process of improving the management of protected across the globe, from a review to consider the reality of each biome and appreciation of their specific areas. In this context, increased in recent years , the experiences of community monitoring, especially in tropical countries, where conventional monitoring is typically more expensive and does not have adequate budgetary and technical support from national governments. Thus, this alternative form of community monitoring aims incorporates the participation of local communities in all stages of implementation, the prioritization of species and resources to monitor the interpretation of the results with the aim of promoting a diagnosis that can contribute to the management of the protected area. It is intended to meet the scope and methodology of ProBUC to know if it really corresponds to a community monitoring program. It is used in theoretical research and direct observations in this article. Controversies and complementary aspects between conventional methods of monitoring and community are exposed by international authors to get exposure to the proposal of Amazonas state program. Furthermore, the main findings of two evaluation events on this program are presented, which show that many adjustments for proper functioning of the program are still required. Finally, it appears that their deployment in 3 conservation units need a review to know its sustainability and local community involvement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Daniel Carneiro Costa, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, AM

Graduado em Economia e especialista em Pedagogia e Organização do Mundo do Trabalho pela Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM). Mestrando do Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Ambientais e Sustentabilidade na Amazônia (PPGCASA), da Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM). Atualmente é Técnico em Assuntos Educacionais da mesma instituição. E-mail: daniel_costa1978@yahoo.com.br.

Guillaume Antoine Marchand, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, AM

Graduado em Historia Antiga pela Universidade d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse e em Ciências Geográficas pela mesma Universidade. Mestre em Estudos Latino-Americanos pela Universidade de Paris III Sorbonne-Nouvelle e Doutor em Geografia também pela Universidade de Paris III Sorbonne-Nouvelle.  Atualmente é professor visitante do Centro de Ciências do Ambiente (CCA) da Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM). E-mail: gaelmarch@yahoo.fr

 

References

ABBOT, JoanneGUIJT, Irene. Changing Views on Change: Participatory Approaches to Monitoring the Environment. In: International Institute for Environment And Development, Londres, UK, 1998. Disponível em: http://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=ZeL0o4AF8aAC&oi=fnd&pg=PA4&ots=XT85gftYu&sig=1jecuGKrhhHiyO8Dts3RvJGQtkI#v=onepage&q&f=false. Acesso em 03. Jan. 2014.

AFRIDI, Farzana. Can community monitoring improve the accountability of public officials? In: Economic e political weekly. Vol. 43. N. 42, 2008. Disponível em: http://www.jstor.org/stable/i40010942. Acesso em: 11. Nov. 2013.

BATISTA, Gelson da Silva et al. O uso do recurso pesqueiro na reserve de desenvolvimento sustentável de Uacari, Amazonas, Brasil, subsídios para elaboração do plano de gestão. In: CALANDINO, D.et al. (orgs.). Áreas protegidas da Amazônia. Brasília, DF. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2008.

BORGES, Sergio Henrique et al .Construindo a gestão do parque estadual Rio Negro setor norte, Amazonas, Brasil.In: In: CALANDINO, D. et al. (orgs.). Áreas protegidas da Amazônia. Brasília, DF. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2008.

BRASIL. Lei 9985 de 18 de julho de 2000 Regulamenta o artigo 225, parágrafo 1º, incisos I,II,III e VII da Constituição Federal, institui o Sistema Nacional de Unidade de Conservação da Natureza e dá outras providências. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília. Disponível em: http://www.mma.gov.br/port/sbf/dap/doc/snuc.pdf. Acesso em: 29 maio 2013.

CUNDILL, George; FABRICIUS, Christo. Monitoring in adaptive co-management: towards a learning based approach. In: Journal of environmental management, n. 90, issue 11, 2009. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479709001510. Acesso em: 27 set. 2013.

DANIELSEN, F. et al. A Simple System for Monitoring Biodiversity in Protected Areas of a Developing Country. In: Biodiversity and Conservation, 2000, v. 9: 1671-1705. Disponível em: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltexttype=1&fid=186888&jid=ORX&volumeId=37&issueId=04&aid=186887. Acesso em 12. Set. 2013.

_____________ et al. Biodiversity monitoring in developing countries: what are we trying to achieve? Oryx, 2003 - Cambridge Univ Press.

_____________ et al; Monitoring matters: Examining the potential of locally-based approaches. In: Biodiversity and conservation v. 14 Issue 11, pp 2507-2542, Springer, 2005. Disponível em: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10531-005-8375-0#page-1. Acesso em: 14 jan. 2014

_______________ et al. Increasing conservation management action by involving local people in natural resource monitoring. In: AMBIO: journal of the human environment, v. 36, n. 7, 2007.

GARCIA, Claude A.; LESCUYER, Guillaume. Monitoring, indicators and community based forest management in the tropics: pretexts or red herrings? In: Biodiversity and Conservation, 2008 – Springer. Disponível em: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10531-008-9347-y. Acesso em 13 jun. 2013.

GAVENTA, John; CREED, Victoria; MORRISSEY, Janice. Scaling up: participatory monitoring and evaluation of a Federal Empowerment Program. In: New Directions for Evaluation, n. 80, Winter, 1998. Disponível em: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ev.1119/abstract. Acesso em 12 set. 2013.

GLASSON, Jhon; THERIVEL, Riki; CHADWICK, Andrew. Introduction to environmental impact assesment. In: Introduction to environmental impact assessment. The natural and built environment series, fourth edition. UCL Press, Londres, 1994. Disponível em: http://books.google.com.br/books?hl=ptBR&lr=&id=NefZAAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=.+Introduction+to+environmental+impact+assesmen-t&ots=dnHMQq8F_Y&sig=5uioBsaEifMJQli6VehxHXo2jF8#v=onepage&q=.%20Introduction%20to%20 environmental%20impact%20assesment&f=false. Acesso em 10 jan. 2014.

HOCKINGS, Marc. Evaluating effectiveness – A framework for assessing the management of protected areas. In: Oxford journals, v.53, n.9, 2000. Disponível em:< http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/53/9/823.short> Acesso em 27 dez. 2013.

JUNIOR, Sinomar F. Fonseca et al. Programa de monitoramento da biodiversidade e do uso de recursos naturais- ProBUC: a experiência das unidades de conservação estaduais do Amazonas. Manaus, Centro Estadual de Unidades de Conservação, 2011.

LAMMERTS van BUEREN EM, BLOM EM. Hierarchical framework for the formulation of sustainable forest managemente standards. In: Tropenbos Foundation, 1997. Disponível em: http://www.piec.org/pathfinder/Pathfinder_portal/Instruments_Engl/A3Hierarchical_framework/print/CI_framework_PF.pdf. Acesso em 23 nov. 2013.

MARINELLI, Carlos Eduardo et al. Ciência, tecnologia e sociedade: sinergia e inovação para construção de conhecimento coletivo sobre UCs da Amazônia Brasileira. In: De olho nas unidades de conservação: sistemas de indicadores socioambientais para unidades de conservação da Amazônia Brasileira. São Paulo: Instituto Socioambiental, 2011.

REBELO, George; PEZZUTI, Juarez. Percepções sobre o consumo de quelônios na Amazônia: sustentabilidade e alternativas ao manejo atual. Ambient. soc., Campinas , n.67, jun. 2000.Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414753X2000000100005&lng=pt&nrm=iso. Acesso em 25 set. 2013.

SHEIL, Douglas; LAWRENCE, Anna. Tropical biologists, local people and conservation: new opportunities for collaboration. In: Trends IN Ecology and Evolution, vol. 19, n. 12, 2004. Disponível: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534704002915. Acesso em 27 set. 2013.

WHITELAW, Graham, et al Establishing the Canadian community monitoring network. In: Environmental monitoring and assessment, 88, 2003. Disponível em: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1025545813057#page-1. Acesso em 30 nov..2013.

Downloads

Published

2014-08-31

How to Cite

Costa, D. C., & Marchand, G. A. (2014). O programa de monitoramento da biodiversidade e do uso sustentável de recursos naturais –ProBUC – como alternativa de monitoramento comunitário amazônico. Monografias Ambientais, 13(3), 3383–3391. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130813498

Issue

REMOA, V. 13, N. 3, MAIO-AGO., 2014

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.