Urban ecology and planning: a necessary convergence

Fabio Henrique Soares Angeoletto, Mark D.E. Fellowes, Liliana Essi, Jeater Waldemar Maciel Correa Santos, Juciane Maria Johann, Deleon da Silva Leandro, Nathalia Moraes Mendonça


The global and massive urbanization of territories is one of today’s most important ecological phenomena. The standards used in urban growth are vital for the conservation of biological diversity, and also affects the provision of a reasonable quality of life for urban populations. Contrary to the perception held by many biologists and other academics, where cities are sterile environments and the opposite of natural, the recent development of urban ecology, a necessarily interdisciplinary science, shows that cities are heterotrophic ecosystems that need to be planned in a manner that reduces their impacts on the biosphere, and that in parallel increases their ability to sustain biodiversity.


Urban Ecology; Urban Ecosystems; Urban Biodiversity; Urban Planning


Aleixo B et al. Human Right in Perspective: Inequalities in Access to Water in a Rural Community of the Brazilian Northeast. Ambiente & Sociedade. 2016; 19(1): 63-84. 2016.

Angeoletto F. Planeta Ciudad: ecología urbana y planificación de ciudades medias de Brasil. Tesis doctoral. Doctorado en Ecología de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. 2012.

Angeoletto F, Moreno M. Tendencias Socio-ambientales de Ciudades Brasileñas. In: Mendes CM, Töws RL (org.). Geografia Urbana e Temas Transversais. Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringa. Maringa, Brasil, 2009.

Angeoletto F, Santos JWMC. Los biólogos brasileños no habitan en el planeta ciudad: por qué es urgente formar ecólogos urbanos. Revista Espaço Acadêmico. 2015; 14(165): 74-82.

Angeoletto F, Santos JWMC, Sanz JPR. ¿Hay flores en el jardín? La vegetación cultivada en patios urbanos a través de un gradiente social. Paisagem e Ambiente. 2015; (35): 119-135.

Angeoletto F. et al. Tipología Socio-Ambiental de las Ciudades Medias de Brasil: Aportes para un Desarrollo Urbano Sostenible. Urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana. 2016; 8(20): 272-287.

Camps-Calvet M et al. Ecosystem services provided by urban gardens in Barcelona, Spain: Insights for policy and planning. Environmental Science & Policy, 2016.

Carvalho E. Exclusão social e crescimento das cidades medias brasileiras. Scripta Nova - Revista Electrônica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales. 2003; 6(146).

Collins JP, Kinzig A, Grimm NB et al. A new urban ecology: Modeling human communities as integral parts of ecosystems poses special problems for the development and testing of ecological theory. American. Scientist. 2000; 88: 416–425.

Dearborn DC, Kark S. Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conservation Biology. 2010; 24(2): 432-440.

Díaz F, Quetier F, Caceres DM et al. Linking Functional Diversity and Social Strategies in a Framework for Interdisciplinary Analysis of Nature´s Benefits to Society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011; 108(3) 895-902.

Dunn RR et al. The pigeon paradox: dependence of global conservation on urban nature. Conservation Biology. 2006; 20(6): 1814-1816.

Faeth SH, Bang C, Saari S. Urban biodiversity: patterns and mechanisms. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2011; 1223(1): 69-81.

Galluzzi G, Eyzaguirre P, Negri V. Home gardens: neglected hotspots of agro-biodiversity and cultural diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2010; 19(13): 3635-3654.

Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG. Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2010; 25: 90-98.

Hand KL et al. A novel method for fine-scale biodiversity assessment and prediction across diverse urban landscapes reveals social deprivation-related inequalities in private, not public spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2016; 151: 33-44.

Hostetler M, Allen W, Meurk C. Conserving urban biodiversity? Creating green infrastructure is only the first step. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2011; 100(4): 369-371.

Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011; 108(9): 3465-3472.

Lubbe CS et al. Political legacy of South Africa affects the plant diversity patterns of urban domestic gardens along a socio-economic gradient. Scientific Research and Essays. 2010; 5(19): 2900-2910.

Mcphearson T et al. Advancing Urban Ecology toward a Science of Cities. BioScience. 2016; 16: 113-124.

Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Cities and Biodiversity Outlook. Montreal, 64 p. 2012.

PNUMA (Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente). Anuario PNUMA – Temas Emergentes en Nuestro Medio Ambiente Global. PNUMA. Nairobi, Kenya. 2011.

Tzoulas K et al. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2007; 81: 167–178.

Tzoulas K, James P. Making biodiversity measures accessible to nonspecialists: an innovative method for rapid assessment of urban biodiversity. Urban Ecosystems. 2010; 13: 113-127.

Terradas J. Ecología Urbana. Editorial Rubes. Barcelona, Espana. 2001.

UNFPA. Estado de la Población Mundial 2007. United Nations Population Fund. New York, USA. 2007.

Vianna M et al. Intelligent transportation systems and parking management: implementation potential in a Brazilian city. Cities. 2004; 21(2): 137–148.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/2236117032452

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



WE ARE ON FACEBOOK! (You are our guest!)


Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.5902/22361170

Contact: reget.ufsm@gmail.com


Accesses since 19/06/2012