Engagement strategies in the context of the Itabira mine closure: impacts and stakeholder participation
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465985153Mots-clés :
Mining, Sustainable development, Stakeholder engagement, Mine closureRésumé
Purpose: This article aims to propose and apply a set of analytical categories for evaluating engagement in mine closure processes. Design/methodology/approach: The qualitative research adopts a case study strategy considering the singularity of the phenomenon studied. The mine project analyzed is the country's first large-scale closure, scheduled for 2041, with the potential to influence future processes. Data collection involved observation, documentary analysis, and interviews. Sixteen interviews were conducted with representatives from the public power, community, organizations, and the company. The research strategy chosen was content analysis using the analytical categories raised in the literature review and triangulation of data collection sources. Findings: The results highlight the importance of the mining company's active role in constructing the city's post-mining future, collaborating to reconvert socio-economic dynamics, and fostering a trusting relationship with the community. However, the company remains distant from the debate. Interviews revealed a paternalistic relationship between the mining company that guides engagement in a predominantly unilateral flow, with communication directed to meet its interests. Originality/value: This research fills a gap in the existing literature by focusing on engagement in a vulnerable context. It contributes to the theoretical advancement of the main characteristics of engagement in mine closure processes and for dialogue practices with communities to favor sustainable territory development in the post-mining period.
Téléchargements
Références
Akbar, D., Rolfe, J., Lechner, A. M., Everingham, J. A., & Kinnear, S. (2020). Workshop processes to generate stakeholder consensus about post-mining land uses: an Australian case study. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 334–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1764341
Babi, K., Asselin, H., & Benzaazoua, M. (2016). Stakeholders’ perceptions of sustainable mining in Morocco: A case study of the abandoned Kettara mine. Extractive Industries and Society, 3(1), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.11.007
Bardin, L. (2010). Análise de conteúdo (4th ed.). Edições.
Bjelkevik, A., & Bohlin, T. (2021). Mine closure – do we miss the opportunities? In A. Fourie, M. Tibbett, & A. Sharkuu (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Mine Closure (pp. 155–172). QMC Group. https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2152_89
Bowles, P., MacPhail, F., & Tetreault, D. (2019). Social licence versus procedural justice: Competing narratives of (Il)legitimacy at the San
Xavier mine, Mexico. Resources Policy, 61(February), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.005
Braga, A. L. F., Pereira, L. A. A., Procópio, M., André, P. A. de, & Saldiva, P. H. do N. (2007). Associação entre poluição atmosférica e doenças respiratórias e cardiovasculares na cidade de Itabira, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 23(suppl 4), S570–S578.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2007001600017
Resolução ANM No 68, de 30 de abril de 2021, (2021). https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/resolucao-anm-n-68-de-30-de-abril-de-
-317640591
Cesare, P., & Maxwell, P. (2003). Mine closure legislation in Indonesia: The role of mineral industry involvement. Natural Resources Forum, 27(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.00039
Coelho, T. P. (2012). Mineração e dependência no quadrilátero ferrífero. Revista Intratextos, 3(1), 128–146.
Coelho, T. P. (2017). Minério-dependência e alternativas em economias locais. Versos–Textos Para Discussão PoEMAS, 1(3), 1–8.
Coelho, T. P. (2018). Minério-Dependência em Brumadinho e Mariana. Lutas Sociais, 22(41), 252–267.
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research. SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, 2(0), 45–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193
Demajorovic, J., Lopes, J. C., & Santiago, A. L. F. (2019). The Samarco dam disaster: A grave challenge to social license to operate discourse. Resources Policy, 61, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.01.017
Deveci, M., Gokasar, I., & Brito-Parada, P. R. (2022). A comprehensive model for socially responsible rehabilitation of mining sites using Q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets and combinative distance-based assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 200(March), 117155.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117155
Dias, A. L. F., & Oliveira, L. F. de. (2018a). Violações de direitos e dano ao projeto de vida no contexto da mineração. Editora Scienza.
Dias, A. L. F., & Oliveira, L. F. de. (2018b). Violências de Mercado e de Estado no contexto do Empreendimento Minerário Minas-Rio/Conceição do Mato Dentro, MG, 2015 a 2017. Editora Scienza.
Dunbar, W. S., Fraser, J., Reynolds, A., & Kunz, N. C. (2020). Mining needs new business models. The Extractive Industries and Society, 7(2), 263–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2019.07.007
Edgett, R. (2002). Toward an ethical framework for advocacy in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14, 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1401_1
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 543--576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/256434
Eiter, S., & Vik, M. L. (2015). Public participation in landscape planning: Effective methods for implementing the European Landscape Convention in Norway. Land Use Policy, 44, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.012
Everingham, J. A., Rolfe, J., Lechner, A. M., Kinnear, S., & Akbar, D. (2018). A proposal for engaging a stakeholder panel in planning post-mining land uses in Australia’s coal-rich tropical savannahs. Land Use Policy, 79(December 2017), 397–406.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.038
Fontoura, Y., Naves, F., Teodosio, A. D. S. D. S., & Gomes, M. (2019). “ Da lama ao caos”: Reflexões sobre a crise ambiental e as relações Estado-Empresa-Sociedade. Farol, 6(15), 17–41.
Fraser, J., & Xavier, A. (2021). “Corporate Social Responsibility in the Mining Sector in Canada,” CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance.
In E. G. Pereira, R. Spencer, & J. W. Moses (Eds.), Sovereign Wealth Funds, Local Content Policies and CSR (pp. 579–600). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56092-8_33
Galo, D. de B., dos Anjos, J. Â. S. A., & Sánchez, L. E. (2022). Are mining companies mature for mine closure? An approach for evaluating preparedness. Resources Policy, 78(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102919
Guimarães, C. L., & Milanez, B. (2017). Mineração, impactos locais e os desafios da diversificação: revisitando Itabira. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 41. https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v41i0.49360
Holley, E. A., & Mitcham, C. (2016). The Pebble Mine Dialogue: A case study in public engagement and the social license to operate. Resources Policy, 47, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.11.002
Hurst, B., Johnston, K. A., & Lane, A. B. (2020). Engaging for a social licence to operate (SLO). Public Relations Review, 46(4), 0–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101931
Johnston, K. A. (2018). Toward a theory of social engagement. In K. A. Johnston & M. Taylor (Eds.), The Handbook of Communication Engagement (pp. 19–32). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119167600.ch2
Mancini, L., & Sala, S. (2018). Social impact assessment in the mining sector: Review and comparison of indicators frameworks. Resources Policy, 57, 98–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.02.002
Mayes, R., Pini, B., & McDonald, P. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and the parameters of dialogue with vulnerable others. Organization, 20(6), 840–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412455083
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Rifkin, W., Louis, W. R., & Moffat, K. (2018). Company-community dialogue builds relationships, fairness, and trust leading to social acceptance of Australian mining developments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 671–677.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.291
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Rifkin, W., Moffat, K., & Louis, W. (2017). Conceptualising the role of dialogue in social licence to operate. Resources Policy, 54, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.09.007
Milanez, B., Magno, L., Santos, R. S. P., Coelho, T. P., Giffoni Pinto, R., Wanderley, L. J. M., & Gonçalves, R. J. A. F. (2019). Minas não há mais: avaliação dos aspectos econômicos e institucionais do desastre da Vale na bacia do rio Paraopeba. Versos-Textos Para Discussão PoEMAS, 3(1), 1–114. https://www.ufjf.br/poemas/publicacoes/desastre-no-rio-paraopeba/
Moffat, K., & Zhang, A. (2014). The paths to social licence to operate: An integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining. Resources Policy, 39(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.11.003
Odell, C. J., Scoble, M., & Bullard, J. R. (2011). Improving socio-environmental outcomes at Andean mines. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 25(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2010.537155
Perdeli Demirkan, C., Smith, N. M., & Duzgun, S. (2022). A Quantitative Sustainability Assessment for Mine Closure and Repurposing Alternatives in Colorado, USA. Resources, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11070066
Pimenta, A. A. F., Demajorovic, J., Saraiva de Souza, M. T., de Carvalho Pedro, S., & Pisano, V. (2021). Social licence to operate model: Critical factors of social acceptance of mining in the Brazilian Amazon. Resources Policy, 74, 102237.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2021.102237
Prno, J., & Scott Slocombe, D. (2012). Exploring the origins of “social license to operate” in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy, 37(3), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.04.002
Raman, S., & Mohr, A. (2014). Biofuels and the role of space in sustainable innovation journeys. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 224–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.057
Rauschmayer, F., & Risse, N. (2005). A framework for the selection of participatory approaches for SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(6), 650–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.005
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science Technology and Human Values, 30(2), 251–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904271724
Vale S.A. (2022). Formulário 20-F: Relatório Anual de acordo com a Seção 13 ou 15(d) da Lei de Mercado de Capitais de 1934, Comissão de Valores Mobiliários dos Estados Unidos (p. 224).
Vivoda, V., Kemp, D., & Owen, J. (2019). Regulating the social aspects of mine closure in three Australian states. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law, 37(4), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2019.1608030
Wasylycia-Leis, J., Fitzpatrick, P., & Fonseca, A. (2014). Mining Communities from a Resilience Perspective: Managing Disturbance and Vulnerability in Itabira, Brazil. Environmental Management, 53(3), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0230-1
Xavier, A. M. (2013). Socio-Economic Mine Closure (SEMC) framework: a comprehensive approach for addressing the socio-economic challenges of mine closure. THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA.
Yang, Y., Li, Y., Chen, F., Zhang, S., & Hou, H. (2019). Regime shift and redevelopment of a mining area’s socio-ecological system under resilience thinking: a case study in Shanxi Province, China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21(5), 2577–2598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0139-6
Zembe, S., & Barnes, D. N. (2023). Exploring community engagement challenges in the mining sector of South Africa. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (Indonesian Journal of Community Engagement), 9(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpkm.72217
Zhao, F., Ma, Y., Xi, F., Yang, L., & Sun, J. (2020). Evaluating the sustainability of mine rehabilitation programs in China. Restoration Ecology, 28(5), 1061–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13183
Zhouri, A., & Laschefski, K. (2010). Conflitos ambientais. In A. Zhouri & K. Laschefski (Eds.), Desenvolvimento e conflitos ambientais (pp.
–34). Editora UFMG. https://doi.org/10.7476/9788542303063
Zvarivadza, T. (2018). Large scale miners - Communities partnerships: A plausible option for communities survival beyond mine closure. Resources Policy, 56(November), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.12.005
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Rodrigo Silva Barreto, Jacques Demajorovic, Adriano Augusto França Pimenta 2024
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Authors of articles published by ReA/UFSM retain the copyright of their works, licensing them under the Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0), which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is properly cited.