Estratégias de engajamento no contexto do fechamento da mina de Itabira: impactos e participação dos stakeholders

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465985153

Palavras-chave:

Mineração, Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Engajamento de stakeholders, Fechamento de minas

Resumo

Objetivo: Este artigo tem como objetivo propor e aplicar um conjunto de categorias analíticas para avaliar o engajamento nos processos de fechamento de minas. Desenho/metodologia/abordagem: A pesquisa de natureza qualitativa adota como estratégia a realização de um estudo de caso considerando singularidade do fenômeno estudado. Trata-se do primeiro fechamento do país em larga escala, previsto para 2041, com potencial de influenciar futuros processos. A coleta de dados envolveu observação, análise documental e entrevistas. Realizou-se 16 entrevistas com representantes do poder público, comunidade, organizações e empresa. A estratégia de pesquisa foi análise de conteúdo utilizando-se as categorias analíticas levantadas na revisão da literatura e a triangulação das fontes de coleta de dados. Resultados: Os resultados ressaltam a importância de a mineradora desempenhar papel ativo na construção do futuro pós-mineração da cidade, colaborando nos esforços de reconversão socioeconômica e fomentando uma relação de confiança com a comunidade. Entretanto, a empresa segue distante do debate. As entrevistas revelaram uma relação de paternalismo da mineradora que orienta o engajamento em um fluxo predominantemente unilateral, com comunicação direcionada para atender seus próprios interesses. Originalidade/valor: Preenche-se uma lacuna na literatura existente ao focar no engajamento num contexto de vulnerabilidade. Contribui-se para o avanço teórico das principais características do engajamento em processos de fechamento de minas e para práticas de diálogo com comunidades de forma a favorecer o desenvolvimento sustentável do território no período pós-mineração.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Rodrigo Silva Barreto, Centro Universitário da FEI

Currently a Ph.D. candidate in Business Administration at FEI University Center, focusing on Sustainability. I hold a master's degree in Business Economics and Finance from Fundação Getúlio Vargas (EGPE / FGV / RJ), a bachelor's degree in Economics from the Federal University of Viçosa, and another in Accounting from Uni. Cruzeiro do Sul. I have specializations in Teaching, Understanding-Based Education, Cities, and Territories. ACADEMIC INVOLVEMENT: Professor at the FEI University Center for Administration. Former professor at UNINOVE for Managerial Sciences at the University Center and at FAM for Management and Business. Member of the NDE (Core Teaching Staff) at FAM University Center and served as the coordinator of the Economics course throughout the course authorization process and the institution's accreditation with MEC (Americas International College - FAMG), under decree 278/2022. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Specialized in societal analysis and institutional behavior with professional experience in the Third Sector, working in Multinational companies and the Federal Government. Experience as a sustainability manager and in the strategic use of business relationships (Stakeholder Engagement). Skilled in identifying and managing socio-economic risks to strengthen ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) performance in large-scale enterprises, maximizing their positive impacts. Areas of expertise: Welfare Economics (social programs, inequality, income), Economic Growth and Development (total factor productivity, education), Regional Economics (migration effects, territorial planning), Business Economics (strategic and institutional planning), Tourism Economics, Third Sector, and Sustainability.

Jacques Demajorovic, Centro Universitário da FEI

Graduated in Economics from the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo (1986), holds a master's degree in Public Administration and Government from Fundação Getúlio Vargas - SP (1994), and a Ph.D. in Education from the University of São Paulo (2000). He was the coordinator and a senior professor at the Senac University Center. He also coordinated the Technology in Environmental Management courses (2001-2003) and the Bachelor's degree in Administration with a Specific Training Line in Environmental Management, as well as serving as a professor in the Master's in Integrated Management Systems at the Senac University Center (2003-2009). He is currently a professor in the Postgraduate Program in Administration at the FEI University Center, focusing on the Research Line in Sustainability. He has been working in the environmental field since 1990, developing projects in areas such as solid waste, eco-efficiency, planning, and environmental management. His research lines include projects on reverse logistics, education and innovation for sustainability, tourism and sustainability, and social license to operate and social impacts of mining. He is the author of the following books: "Society of Risk and Socio-Environmental Responsibility: Perspectives for Corporate Education," "Models and Tools for Environmental Management: Challenges and Perspectives for Organizations," "Selective Collection with Social Inclusion," and "Recycling Chain: A Look at the Collectors." In 2012, he won the Santander Award for Practices in Education for Sustainability for integrating sustainability into undergraduate courses in Administration. In 2014, he received the Santander Universities Research Grant for a postdoctoral position at the University of Alicante. He is a collaborating professor in the Environmental Sciences Program/IEE/USP, a collaborating professor in the Sociology Department at the University of Alicante, Spain, and was the scientific editor of the Journal of Social and Environmental Management - RGSA (2013-2019), which is ranked as A3 in the Qualis system. He currently coordinates two research groups at CNPQ, one dedicated to Reverse Logistics and the other to Social License to Operate in the mining sector. In 2016, his research project was approved in the Vale Call for Proposals to develop the research "Determining Factors of the License to Operate and Metric for Assessing the Level of Social Acceptance by Local Communities." In 2022, his project "Social License to Operate and Vulnerability: A Proposal for Integrating the Social Dimension in Mine Closure Processes for Post-Mining Transition" was approved in the Universal Call for Emerging Groups by CNPQ. In 2023, he was included in the World Top 100 Business Management/Business Administration Scientists in Brazil ranking.

Adriano Augusto França Pimenta, Centro Universitário da FEI

Ph.D. candidate in Sustainability in the field of Administration at FEI/SP since August 2020. PROSUC/CAPES scholarship holder since December 2020. Master's degree in Sustainability in the field of Administration at FEI/SP (completed in June 2020). Researcher in the CNPQ Research Group on Social License to Operate in mining since 2017. Scholarship holder for the FEI/Vale Project: Critical Factors of the Social License to Operate (August 2018 to June 2020). Technical Consultant for ITCP-FGV Incubator for Popular Cooperatives of Fundação Getúlio Vargas (May 2012 to December 2013). Bachelor's degree in Production Engineering from UFMG (December 2008). University Extension Scholarship for the Solidarity Economy Center of Production Engineering (January 2008 to June 2008). Speaker and Consultant in Sustainability. Over 13 years of professional experience in planning and implementing Sustainability, ESG, and Corporate Social Responsibility projects in collaboration with companies, private institutes, third-sector organizations, and government. Specialist in Environment, Social Impacts, and Selective Collection/Recycling. Social Projects Manager and Director of Social Impact at ISES - Institute of Solidarity Socio-Economics (January 2014 to October 2018). Sustainability Trainee in the Environmental area at Unilever Brazil (January 2009 to May 2012).

Referências

Akbar, D., Rolfe, J., Lechner, A. M., Everingham, J. A., & Kinnear, S. (2020). Workshop processes to generate stakeholder consensus about post-mining land uses: an Australian case study. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 334–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1764341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1764341

Babi, K., Asselin, H., & Benzaazoua, M. (2016). Stakeholders’ perceptions of sustainable mining in Morocco: A case study of the abandoned Kettara mine. Extractive Industries and Society, 3(1), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.11.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.11.007

Bardin, L. (2010). Análise de conteúdo (4th ed.). Edições.

Bjelkevik, A., & Bohlin, T. (2021). Mine closure – do we miss the opportunities? In A. Fourie, M. Tibbett, & A. Sharkuu (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Mine Closure (pp. 155–172). QMC Group. https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2152_89 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2152_89

Bowles, P., MacPhail, F., & Tetreault, D. (2019). Social licence versus procedural justice: Competing narratives of (Il)legitimacy at the San

Xavier mine, Mexico. Resources Policy, 61(February), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.005

Braga, A. L. F., Pereira, L. A. A., Procópio, M., André, P. A. de, & Saldiva, P. H. do N. (2007). Associação entre poluição atmosférica e doenças respiratórias e cardiovasculares na cidade de Itabira, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 23(suppl 4), S570–S578.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2007001600017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2007001600017

Resolução ANM No 68, de 30 de abril de 2021, (2021). https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/resolucao-anm-n-68-de-30-de-abril-de-

-317640591

Cesare, P., & Maxwell, P. (2003). Mine closure legislation in Indonesia: The role of mineral industry involvement. Natural Resources Forum, 27(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.00039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.00039

Coelho, T. P. (2012). Mineração e dependência no quadrilátero ferrífero. Revista Intratextos, 3(1), 128–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12957/intratextos.2012.3140

Coelho, T. P. (2017). Minério-dependência e alternativas em economias locais. Versos–Textos Para Discussão PoEMAS, 1(3), 1–8.

Coelho, T. P. (2018). Minério-Dependência em Brumadinho e Mariana. Lutas Sociais, 22(41), 252–267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23925/ls.v22i41.46681

Creswell, J. W. (2010). Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research. SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, 2(0), 45–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193.n2

Demajorovic, J., Lopes, J. C., & Santiago, A. L. F. (2019). The Samarco dam disaster: A grave challenge to social license to operate discourse. Resources Policy, 61, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.01.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.01.017

Deveci, M., Gokasar, I., & Brito-Parada, P. R. (2022). A comprehensive model for socially responsible rehabilitation of mining sites using Q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets and combinative distance-based assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 200(March), 117155.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117155

Dias, A. L. F., & Oliveira, L. F. de. (2018a). Violações de direitos e dano ao projeto de vida no contexto da mineração. Editora Scienza.

Dias, A. L. F., & Oliveira, L. F. de. (2018b). Violências de Mercado e de Estado no contexto do Empreendimento Minerário Minas-Rio/Conceição do Mato Dentro, MG, 2015 a 2017. Editora Scienza.

Dunbar, W. S., Fraser, J., Reynolds, A., & Kunz, N. C. (2020). Mining needs new business models. The Extractive Industries and Society, 7(2), 263–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2019.07.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2019.07.007

Edgett, R. (2002). Toward an ethical framework for advocacy in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14, 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1401_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1401_1

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 543--576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/256434 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/256434

Eiter, S., & Vik, M. L. (2015). Public participation in landscape planning: Effective methods for implementing the European Landscape Convention in Norway. Land Use Policy, 44, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.012

Everingham, J. A., Rolfe, J., Lechner, A. M., Kinnear, S., & Akbar, D. (2018). A proposal for engaging a stakeholder panel in planning post-mining land uses in Australia’s coal-rich tropical savannahs. Land Use Policy, 79(December 2017), 397–406.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.038

Fontoura, Y., Naves, F., Teodosio, A. D. S. D. S., & Gomes, M. (2019). “ Da lama ao caos”: Reflexões sobre a crise ambiental e as relações Estado-Empresa-Sociedade. Farol, 6(15), 17–41.

Fraser, J., & Xavier, A. (2021). “Corporate Social Responsibility in the Mining Sector in Canada,” CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance.

In E. G. Pereira, R. Spencer, & J. W. Moses (Eds.), Sovereign Wealth Funds, Local Content Policies and CSR (pp. 579–600). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56092-8_33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56092-8_33

Galo, D. de B., dos Anjos, J. Â. S. A., & Sánchez, L. E. (2022). Are mining companies mature for mine closure? An approach for evaluating preparedness. Resources Policy, 78(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102919

Guimarães, C. L., & Milanez, B. (2017). Mineração, impactos locais e os desafios da diversificação: revisitando Itabira. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 41. https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v41i0.49360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v41i0.49360

Holley, E. A., & Mitcham, C. (2016). The Pebble Mine Dialogue: A case study in public engagement and the social license to operate. Resources Policy, 47, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.11.002

Hurst, B., Johnston, K. A., & Lane, A. B. (2020). Engaging for a social licence to operate (SLO). Public Relations Review, 46(4), 0–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101931 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101931

Johnston, K. A. (2018). Toward a theory of social engagement. In K. A. Johnston & M. Taylor (Eds.), The Handbook of Communication Engagement (pp. 19–32). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119167600.ch2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119167600.ch2

Mancini, L., & Sala, S. (2018). Social impact assessment in the mining sector: Review and comparison of indicators frameworks. Resources Policy, 57, 98–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.02.002

Mayes, R., Pini, B., & McDonald, P. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and the parameters of dialogue with vulnerable others. Organization, 20(6), 840–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412455083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412455083

Mercer-Mapstone, L., Rifkin, W., Louis, W. R., & Moffat, K. (2018). Company-community dialogue builds relationships, fairness, and trust leading to social acceptance of Australian mining developments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 671–677.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.291

Mercer-Mapstone, L., Rifkin, W., Moffat, K., & Louis, W. (2017). Conceptualising the role of dialogue in social licence to operate. Resources Policy, 54, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.09.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.09.007

Milanez, B., Magno, L., Santos, R. S. P., Coelho, T. P., Giffoni Pinto, R., Wanderley, L. J. M., & Gonçalves, R. J. A. F. (2019). Minas não há mais: avaliação dos aspectos econômicos e institucionais do desastre da Vale na bacia do rio Paraopeba. Versos-Textos Para Discussão PoEMAS, 3(1), 1–114. https://www.ufjf.br/poemas/publicacoes/desastre-no-rio-paraopeba/

Moffat, K., & Zhang, A. (2014). The paths to social licence to operate: An integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining. Resources Policy, 39(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.11.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.11.003

Odell, C. J., Scoble, M., & Bullard, J. R. (2011). Improving socio-environmental outcomes at Andean mines. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 25(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2010.537155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2010.537155

Perdeli Demirkan, C., Smith, N. M., & Duzgun, S. (2022). A Quantitative Sustainability Assessment for Mine Closure and Repurposing Alternatives in Colorado, USA. Resources, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11070066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11070066

Pimenta, A. A. F., Demajorovic, J., Saraiva de Souza, M. T., de Carvalho Pedro, S., & Pisano, V. (2021). Social licence to operate model: Critical factors of social acceptance of mining in the Brazilian Amazon. Resources Policy, 74, 102237.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2021.102237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102237

Prno, J., & Scott Slocombe, D. (2012). Exploring the origins of “social license to operate” in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy, 37(3), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.04.002

Raman, S., & Mohr, A. (2014). Biofuels and the role of space in sustainable innovation journeys. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 224–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.057

Rauschmayer, F., & Risse, N. (2005). A framework for the selection of participatory approaches for SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(6), 650–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.005

Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science Technology and Human Values, 30(2), 251–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904271724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904271724

Vale S.A. (2022). Formulário 20-F: Relatório Anual de acordo com a Seção 13 ou 15(d) da Lei de Mercado de Capitais de 1934, Comissão de Valores Mobiliários dos Estados Unidos (p. 224).

Vivoda, V., Kemp, D., & Owen, J. (2019). Regulating the social aspects of mine closure in three Australian states. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law, 37(4), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2019.1608030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2019.1608030

Wasylycia-Leis, J., Fitzpatrick, P., & Fonseca, A. (2014). Mining Communities from a Resilience Perspective: Managing Disturbance and Vulnerability in Itabira, Brazil. Environmental Management, 53(3), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0230-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0230-1

Xavier, A. M. (2013). Socio-Economic Mine Closure (SEMC) framework: a comprehensive approach for addressing the socio-economic challenges of mine closure. THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA.

Yang, Y., Li, Y., Chen, F., Zhang, S., & Hou, H. (2019). Regime shift and redevelopment of a mining area’s socio-ecological system under resilience thinking: a case study in Shanxi Province, China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21(5), 2577–2598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0139-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0139-6

Zembe, S., & Barnes, D. N. (2023). Exploring community engagement challenges in the mining sector of South Africa. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (Indonesian Journal of Community Engagement), 9(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpkm.72217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpkm.72217

Zhao, F., Ma, Y., Xi, F., Yang, L., & Sun, J. (2020). Evaluating the sustainability of mine rehabilitation programs in China. Restoration Ecology, 28(5), 1061–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13183

Zhouri, A., & Laschefski, K. (2010). Conflitos ambientais. In A. Zhouri & K. Laschefski (Eds.), Desenvolvimento e conflitos ambientais (pp.

–34). Editora UFMG. https://doi.org/10.7476/9788542303063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7476/9788542303063

Zvarivadza, T. (2018). Large scale miners - Communities partnerships: A plausible option for communities survival beyond mine closure. Resources Policy, 56(November), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.12.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.12.005

Downloads

Publicado

2024-10-07

Como Citar

Barreto, R. S., Demajorovic, J., & Pimenta, A. A. F. (2024). Estratégias de engajamento no contexto do fechamento da mina de Itabira: impactos e participação dos stakeholders. Revista De Administração Da UFSM, 17(3), e8. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465985153

Edição

v. 17 n. 3 (2024): Jul-Set

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Copyright (c) 2024 Rodrigo Silva Barreto, Jacques Demajorovic, Adriano Augusto França Pimenta

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Até 2023 os direitos autorais eram transferidos pelos autores para a ReA/UFSM. A partir de 2024 os autores dos artigos publicados pela ReA/UFSM mantêm os direitos autorais de seus trabalhos.
A revista adota a licença Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0), que permite que os artigos sejam reutilizados e distribuídos sem restrições, desde que o trabalho original seja devidamente citado.

 

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)