Innovation projects management: a systematic literature review
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465962712Mots-clés :
Gerenciamento de Projetos, Estratégia de Projetos, InovaçãoRésumé
Purpose: To highlight how the theme innovation unfolds within the scope of project management and how both have been addressed in scientific literature in the last two decades
Methodology: This research is a Systematic Literature Review, where procedures were applied in the selection of articles in Scopus and Web of Science databases, for the identification and interpretation of the main publications on the topic in the scientific literature, seeking to understand its relevance and evolution the last twenty years.
Findings: The obtained sample, based on the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases, totaled 13 articles from different sectors and areas of knowledge, with a predominance of publications linked mainly to the research and development area, with greater progress in innovation projects.
Practical Implications: This research contributes to improving the understanding of the benefits of the practice of managing innovation projects.
Social implications: The findings of this research will contribute to the understanding of how the management of innovation projects can contribute to maximize success in the dealings practiced in these projects. And due to the particular characteristics of innovation, focus on management efficiency and focus on results.
Originality: This research addresses current and very broad themes - project management and innovation - involving several disciplines (human and social capital, teams, strategy, conflict management, knowledge management, governance, innovation, integration, research and development, intellectual property, behavioral theory), in an unprecedented way and seeks to define the new paradigm of development called Innovation Project Management.
Téléchargements
Références
Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21-47. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00119.x
Bahemia, H., Squire, B., & Cousins, P. (2017). A multi-dimensional approach for managing open innovation in NPD. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(10), 1366-1385.
Bendoly, E., & Chao, R. O. (2016). How excessive stage time reduction in NPD negatively impacts market value. Production and Operations Management, 25(5), 812-832.
Bican, P. M., Guderian, C. C., & Ringbeck, A. (2017). Managing knowledge in open innovation processes: an intellectual property perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1384-1405.
Bruce, J. R., de Figueiredo, J. M., & Silverman, B. S. (2019). Public contracting for private innovation: Government capabilities, decision rights, and performance outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 40(4), 533-555.
Carmeli, A., & Dothan, A. (2017). Generative work relationships as a source of direct and indirect learning from experiences of failure: Implications for innovation agility and product innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 27-38.
Cassiman, B., & Valentini, G. (2009). Strategic organization of R&D: the choice of basicness and openness. Strategic Organization, 7(1), 43-73.
Castro, A. A. (2001) Revisão sistemática e meta-análise. Compacta: temas de cardiologia, v. 3, n. 1, p. 5-9.
Chaudhuri, A. (2013). Simultaneous improvement in development time, cost and quality: a practical framework for generic pharmaceuticals industry. R&d Management, 43(3), 227-241.
Fonseca, J. J. S. (2002). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. Fortaleza: UEC. Apostila.
Keupp, M. M., Palmié, M., & Gassmann, O. (2012). The strategic management of innovation: A systematic review and paths for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 367- 390. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00321.x
Kitchenham, B. A., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Keele University. Tech. Rep. EBSE-2007-01.
Lee, S. H., Wong, P. K., & Chong, C. L. (2005). Human and social capital explanations for R&D outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(1), 59-68.
Malhorta, N. K. (1993). Marketing research: an applied orientation. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Mattar, F. N. (1999) Pesquisa de marketing: metodologia, planejamento. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas. 1 v.
Motta, G., Garcia, P. A. A., & Quintella, R. H. (2015). A patento scientometric approach to venture capital investment prioritization. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(4), 765-777. doi:10.1002/asi.23205
Richardson, R. J., & Peres, J. A. (1985). Pesquisa social: métodos e técnicas. São Paulo: Atlas.
Rosseto, D., Bernardes, C. R., Borini, F. M., & Gattaz, C. (2018). Structure and evolution of innovation research in the last 60 years: Review and future trends in the field of business through the citations and cocitations analysis. Scientometrics, 115(3), 1329-1363. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2709-7
Sampieri, R. H.; Collado, C. F. & Lucio, P. B. (1998). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw-Hill.
Selltiz, C. (1967) Métodos de pesquisa nas relações sociais. São Paulo: Herder.
Schulze, A. D., Stade, M. J. C., & Netzel, J. (2014). Conflict and conflict management in innovation processes in the life sciences. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(1), 57-75.
Silva, Rafael M.; SENNA, Eliana T. P.; SENNA, Luiz A. S.; JÚNIOR, Orlando F. Lima. (2014). Plataformas Logísticas: uma abordagem sobre as tipologias e características através de uma revisão sistemática. Journal of Transport Literature.
Stadler, C. (2011). Process innovation and integration in process‐oriented settings: The case of the oil industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(s1), 44-62.
Stake, Robert E. (2011). Pesquisa qualitativa: estudando como as coisas funcionam. Porto Alegre: Penso.
Szutowski, D., & Szułczyńska, J. (2017). Exploring Companies’ Innovation Policies in the Industrial Sector in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 25(4), 158-176.
Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long range planning, 43(2-3), 172-194.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review.
Triviños, A. N. S. (1987). Introdução à pesquisa em ciências sociais: a pesquisa qualitativa em educação. São Paulo: Atlas.
Van Maanen, J. (1979). Reclaiming qualitative methods for organizational research: A preface. Administrative Science quarterly, v. 24, n. 4, p. 520-526.
Yan, T., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Do what and with whom? Value creation and appropriation in inter-organizational new product development projects. International Journal of Production Economics, 191, 1-14.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Revista de Administração da UFSM 2021
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Authors of articles published by ReA/UFSM retain the copyright of their works, licensing them under the Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0), which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is properly cited.
