ESG index impact on the performance of education sector companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465986171Palabras clave:
ESG, Resultados financieros, Resultados del mercado, Instituciones educativasResumen
Propósito: Este documento pretendía identificar el impacto de las puntuaciones ambientales, sociales y de gobernanza (ESG) de los colegios, universidades y escuelas profesionales con ánimo de lucro en sus resultados de mercado y financieros. Diseño/metodología/enfoque: Se utilizaron como muestra los datos de 50 empresas de todo el mundo, cotizadas en bolsa y con datos ESG disponibles para el periodo 2012 a 2021 contenidos en la base de información EIKON-REFINITIV. Como variables de rendimiento se utilizaron la Q de Tobin y el Market-to-Book (MTB), variables ampliamente adoptadas en estudios económicos similares. Como variables de rendimiento financiero se utilizaron el rendimiento de los activos (ROA) y el rendimiento de los fondos propios (ROE). Las variables explicativas consistieron en los índices ESG combinado, ESG pilar social, pilar medioambiental y pilar de gobernanza. Como técnica de análisis se utilizó el método generalizado de regresión de momentos (GMM). Resultados: Como resultado, se halló una relación significativa y positiva entre las puntuaciones combinadas ESG y Pilar Social y el rendimiento financiero, representado por ROE y ROA. Este resultado es similar al de una amplia variedad de otros estudios que hallaron la misma relación positiva. Por el contrario, se observó una relación significativa y negativa entre las puntuaciones combinadas de ASG y Pilar Social y los indicadores de mercado Q de Tobin y MTB. Implicaciones prácticas: Los resultados indican que, aunque las puntuaciones ESG combinadas y del Pilar Social y el rendimiento financiero están positivamente relacionados con los resultados financieros, el mercado no reconoce positivamente ni pone precio a las acciones debido a estas puntuaciones. Originalidad: Estos resultados aún no se habían observado para este sector.
Descargas
Citas
Abate, G., Basile, I., & Ferrari, P. (2021). The level of sustainability and mutual fund performance in Europe: An empirical analysis using ESG ratings. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(5), 1446–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2175
Amaral, L. P., Martins, N., & Gouveia, J. B. (2015). Quest for a sustainable university: A review. In International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education (Vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 155–172). Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2013-0017
Azizi, L., & Sassen, R. (2023). How universities’ social responsibility activities influence students’ perceptions of reputation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 417, 137963. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137963
Bruna, M. G., Loprevite, S., Raucci, D., Ricca, B., & Rupo, D. (2022). Investigating the marginal impact of ESG results on corporate financial performance. Finance Research Letters, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102828
Caeiro, S., & Azeiteiro, U. M. (2020). Sustainability assessment in higher education institutions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12083433
Caiado, R. G. G., Leal Filho, W., Quelhas, O. L. G., Nascimento, D. L. de M., & Ávila, L. V. (2018). A literature-based review on potentials and constraints in the implementation of the sustainable development goals. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 198, pp. 1276–1288). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.102
Carvalho, F. P., Maia, V. M., Louzada, L. C., & Gonçalves, M. A. (2017). Desempenho Setorial de Empresas Brasileiras: Um Estudo Sob a Ótica do ROE, Q de Tobin e Market to Book. Revista de Gestão, Finanças e Contabilidade, 7(1), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.18028/2238-5320/rgfc.v7n1p149-163
Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102291
Cortese, A. D. (2003). The Critical Role of Higher Education in Creating a Sustainable Future. Planning for Higher Education, 31(3), 15–22.
De Lucia, C., Pazienza, P., & Bartlett, M. (2020). Does good ESG lead to better financial performances by firms? Machine learning and logistic regression models of public enterprises in Europe. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135317
Eccles, N. S., & Viviers, S. (2011). The Origins and Meanings of Names Describing Investment Practices that Integrate a Consideration of ESG Issues in the Academic Literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0917-7
Eccles, R. G., Verheyden, T., & Feiner, A. (2016). ESG for All? The Impact of ESG Screening on Return, Risk, and Diversification. In SSRN. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12174
Folger-Laronde, Z., Pashang, S., Feor, L., & ElAlfy, A. (2022). ESG ratings and financial performance of exchange-traded funds during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 12(2), 490–496.
https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1782814Fooladi, I. J., & Hebb, G. (2022). Drivers of differences in performance of ESG-focused funds relative to their underlying benchmarks. Global Finance Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2022.100745
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. (2017). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.180
Garland, M. (2020). How vulnerable are you? Assessing the financial health of England’s universities. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 24(2), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2019.1689374
Gavana, G., Gottardo, P., & Moisello, A. M. (2022). Related Party Transactions and Earnings Management: The Moderating Effect of ESG Performance. Empirical Evidence from Italy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105823Griebeler, J.S.,
Brandli, L.L., Salvia, A.L., Leal Filho, W. and Reginatto, G. (2022), “Sustainable development goals: a framework for deploying indicators for higher education institutions”, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 887-914. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-03-2021-0088
Grosseck, G.; Țîru, L.G.; Bran, R.A. Education for Sustainable Development: Evolution and Perspectives: A Bibliometric Review of Research, 1992–2018. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6136. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216136Hirth, S., & Viswanatha, M. (2011). Financing constraints, cash-flow risk, and corporate investment. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.09.002
Joh, S. W., & Jung, J. (2016). Top managers’ academic credentials and firm value. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 45(2), 185–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12127
Koundouri, P., Pittis, N., & Plataniotis, A. (2022). The Impact of ESG Performance on the Financial Performance of European Area Companies: An Empirical Examination. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022015013
Leal Filho, W., Salvia, A. L., Frankenberger, F., Akib, N. A. M., Sen, S. K., Sivapalan, S., Novo-Corti, I., Venkatesan, M., & Emblen-Perry, K. (2021). Governance and sustainable development at higher education institutions. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(4), 6002–6020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00859-y
Li, H., & Chen, P. (2018). Board gender diversity and firm performance: The moderating role of firm size. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27(4), 294–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12188
Mak, Y. T., & Kusnadi, Y. (2005). Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific-Basin finance journal, 13(3), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.09.002
Nirino, N., Santoro, G., Miglietta, N., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Corporate controversies and company’s financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120341
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12). https://doi.org/10.1108/sd.2007.05623ead.006
Rahman, H. U., Zahid, M., & Al‐Faryan, M. a. S. (2023). ESG and firm performance: The rarely explored moderation of sustainability strategy and top management commitment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 404, 136859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136859
Ruch, R. S. (2003). Higher Ed, Inc.: The rise of the for-profit university. JHU Press.
Sachs, J.D., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., Drumm, E. (2023). Implementing the SDG Stimulus. Sustainable Development Report 2023. Paris: SDSN, Dublin: Dublin University Press, 2023. 10.25546/102924
Saini, N., Antil, A., Gunasekaran, A., Malik, K., & Balakumar, S. (2022). Environment-Social-Governance Disclosures nexus between Financial Performance: A Sustainable Value Chain Approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106571
Saini, N., & Singhania, M. (2019). Performance relevance of environmental and social disclosures: The role of foreign ownership. Benchmarking, 26(6), 1845–1873. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2018-0114
Sanches, F. E. F., Campos, M. L., Gaio, L. E., & Belli, M. M. (2022). Proposal for sustainability action archetypes for higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(4), 915–939. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2021-0026
Sanches, F. E. F., Souza Junior, M. A. A. de, Massaro Junior, F. R., Povedano, R., & Gaio, L. E. (2022). Developing a method for incorporating sustainability into the strategic planning of higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2021-0439
Shaikh, I. (2021). Environmental, social, and governance (esg) practice and firm performance: an international evidence. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(1), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2022.16202
Sousa, E. (2014). Market-to-book: an evaluation of the listed companies in differentiated segments of the bm&fbovespa. In CONTABILOMETRIA-Brazilian Journal of Quantitative Methods Applied to Accounting (Issue 1). World Bank (2023) World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/ (access in 03th, march, 2024)
Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2224
Yoo, S., & Managi, S. (2022). Disclosure or action: Evaluating ESG behavior towards financial performance. Finance Research Letters, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102108
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Revista de Administração da UFSM
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
- 2.13 Derechos de autor y licencias: esta revista sigue siendo el titular de los derechos de autor de los artículos publicados. Para ser publicado, los autores deben firmar la Carta de transferencia de derechos de autor, que se envía a los autores por correo electrónico, otorgando derechos, incluida la traducción, a ReA / UFSM. La revista otorga a terceros el derecho a usar, reproducir y compartir el artículo de acuerdo con el acuerdo de licencia Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0), como se indica en los documentos PDF de los artículos.
