ESG index impact on the performance of education sector companies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465986171

Keywords:

ESG, Financial performance, Market performance, Educational institutions

Abstract

Purpose: This paper examined the impact of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) scores of for-profit colleges, universities, and professional schools on their market and financial results.
Design/methodology/approach: Sample data from 50 companies, national and international, listed on a stock exchange and with ESG data available from 2012 to 2021 was obtained on the EIKON-REFINITIV information database. Performance variables comprised Tobin’s Q and Market-to-Book (MTB), widely adopted in similar economic studies. Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) conformed to the financial performance variables. Explanatory variables consisted of ESG combined, ESG Social Pillar, Environmental Pillar, and Governance Pillar indexes. The analysis used the Generalized Method of Moments regression (GMM).
Findings: ESG combined showed a significant positive relationship with Social Pillar scores and financial performance, represented by ROE and ROA, as found by other studies. Conversely, we observed a significant negative relationship between ESG combined and Social Pillar scores and market indicators (Tobin’s Q and MTB).
Practical implications: Results indicate that although ESG combined, Social Pillar scores, and financial performance are positively related to financial results, these do not reflect positive market recognition or price shares.
Originality: First-time results for this sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Jair Manoel Casquel Júnior, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)

PhD student in Management.

Rafael Povedano, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)

PhD student in Administration.

Luís Henrique Dos Santos, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)

PhD Student in Administration.

Marcio Marcelo Belli, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)

Docente na UNICAMP.

Luiz Eduardo Gaio, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)

Professor in the PhD program in Management.

References

Abate, G., Basile, I., & Ferrari, P. (2021). The level of sustainability and mutual fund performance in Europe: An empirical analysis using ESG ratings. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(5), 1446–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2175

Amaral, L. P., Martins, N., & Gouveia, J. B. (2015). Quest for a sustainable university: A review. In International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education (Vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 155–172). Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2013-0017

Azizi, L., & Sassen, R. (2023). How universities’ social responsibility activities influence students’ perceptions of reputation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 417, 137963. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137963

Bruna, M. G., Loprevite, S., Raucci, D., Ricca, B., & Rupo, D. (2022). Investigating the marginal impact of ESG results on corporate financial performance. Finance Research Letters, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102828

Caeiro, S., & Azeiteiro, U. M. (2020). Sustainability assessment in higher education institutions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12083433

Caiado, R. G. G., Leal Filho, W., Quelhas, O. L. G., Nascimento, D. L. de M., & Ávila, L. V. (2018). A literature-based review on potentials and constraints in the implementation of the sustainable development goals. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 198, pp. 1276–1288). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.102

Carvalho, F. P., Maia, V. M., Louzada, L. C., & Gonçalves, M. A. (2017). Desempenho Setorial de Empresas Brasileiras: Um Estudo Sob a Ótica do ROE, Q de Tobin e Market to Book. Revista de Gestão, Finanças e Contabilidade, 7(1), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.18028/2238-5320/rgfc.v7n1p149-163

Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102291

Cortese, A. D. (2003). The Critical Role of Higher Education in Creating a Sustainable Future. Planning for Higher Education, 31(3), 15–22.

De Lucia, C., Pazienza, P., & Bartlett, M. (2020). Does good ESG lead to better financial performances by firms? Machine learning and logistic regression models of public enterprises in Europe. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135317

Eccles, N. S., & Viviers, S. (2011). The Origins and Meanings of Names Describing Investment Practices that Integrate a Consideration of ESG Issues in the Academic Literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0917-7

Eccles, R. G., Verheyden, T., & Feiner, A. (2016). ESG for All? The Impact of ESG Screening on Return, Risk, and Diversification. In SSRN. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12174

Folger-Laronde, Z., Pashang, S., Feor, L., & ElAlfy, A. (2022). ESG ratings and financial performance of exchange-traded funds during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 12(2), 490–496.

https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1782814Fooladi, I. J., & Hebb, G. (2022). Drivers of differences in performance of ESG-focused funds relative to their underlying benchmarks. Global Finance Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2022.100745

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. (2017). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.180

Garland, M. (2020). How vulnerable are you? Assessing the financial health of England’s universities. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 24(2), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2019.1689374

Gavana, G., Gottardo, P., & Moisello, A. M. (2022). Related Party Transactions and Earnings Management: The Moderating Effect of ESG Performance. Empirical Evidence from Italy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105823Griebeler, J.S.,

Brandli, L.L., Salvia, A.L., Leal Filho, W. and Reginatto, G. (2022), “Sustainable development goals: a framework for deploying indicators for higher education institutions”, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 887-914. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-03-2021-0088

Grosseck, G.; Țîru, L.G.; Bran, R.A. Education for Sustainable Development: Evolution and Perspectives: A Bibliometric Review of Research, 1992–2018. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6136. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216136Hirth, S., & Viswanatha, M. (2011). Financing constraints, cash-flow risk, and corporate investment. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.09.002

Joh, S. W., & Jung, J. (2016). Top managers’ academic credentials and firm value. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 45(2), 185–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12127

Koundouri, P., Pittis, N., & Plataniotis, A. (2022). The Impact of ESG Performance on the Financial Performance of European Area Companies: An Empirical Examination. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022015013

Leal Filho, W., Salvia, A. L., Frankenberger, F., Akib, N. A. M., Sen, S. K., Sivapalan, S., Novo-Corti, I., Venkatesan, M., & Emblen-Perry, K. (2021). Governance and sustainable development at higher education institutions. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(4), 6002–6020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00859-y

Li, H., & Chen, P. (2018). Board gender diversity and firm performance: The moderating role of firm size. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27(4), 294–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12188

Mak, Y. T., & Kusnadi, Y. (2005). Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific-Basin finance journal, 13(3), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.09.002

Nirino, N., Santoro, G., Miglietta, N., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Corporate controversies and company’s financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120341

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12). https://doi.org/10.1108/sd.2007.05623ead.006

Rahman, H. U., Zahid, M., & Al‐Faryan, M. a. S. (2023). ESG and firm performance: The rarely explored moderation of sustainability strategy and top management commitment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 404, 136859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136859

Ruch, R. S. (2003). Higher Ed, Inc.: The rise of the for-profit university. JHU Press.

Sachs, J.D., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., Drumm, E. (2023). Implementing the SDG Stimulus. Sustainable Development Report 2023. Paris: SDSN, Dublin: Dublin University Press, 2023. 10.25546/102924

Saini, N., Antil, A., Gunasekaran, A., Malik, K., & Balakumar, S. (2022). Environment-Social-Governance Disclosures nexus between Financial Performance: A Sustainable Value Chain Approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106571

Saini, N., & Singhania, M. (2019). Performance relevance of environmental and social disclosures: The role of foreign ownership. Benchmarking, 26(6), 1845–1873. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2018-0114

Sanches, F. E. F., Campos, M. L., Gaio, L. E., & Belli, M. M. (2022). Proposal for sustainability action archetypes for higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(4), 915–939. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2021-0026

Sanches, F. E. F., Souza Junior, M. A. A. de, Massaro Junior, F. R., Povedano, R., & Gaio, L. E. (2022). Developing a method for incorporating sustainability into the strategic planning of higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2021-0439

Shaikh, I. (2021). Environmental, social, and governance (esg) practice and firm performance: an international evidence. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(1), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2022.16202

Sousa, E. (2014). Market-to-book: an evaluation of the listed companies in differentiated segments of the bm&fbovespa. In CONTABILOMETRIA-Brazilian Journal of Quantitative Methods Applied to Accounting (Issue 1). World Bank (2023) World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/ (access in 03th, march, 2024)

Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2224

Yoo, S., & Managi, S. (2022). Disclosure or action: Evaluating ESG behavior towards financial performance. Finance Research Letters, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102108

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Casquel Júnior, J. M., Povedano, R., Santos, L. H. D., Belli, M. M., & Gaio, L. E. . (2024). ESG index impact on the performance of education sector companies. Revista De Administração Da UFSM, 17(2), e10. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465986171

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)