Attention and skepticism to greenwashing: analysis of influence on consumer behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465973743Keywords:
Cognitive process, Pre-attention, Greenwashing, Skepticism, Consumer behaviorAbstract
Purpose: The goal was to assess the influence of greenwashing on consumer behavior, according to the levels of attention and skepticism involved in receiving and processing the stimulus.
Design/methodology/approach: The method consisted of a hypothetical-deductive approach, performed through an experiment (n=151) with a 2 (attention or pre-attention) x 2 (skepticism or non-skepticism) factorial design, with the presentation and subsequent evaluation of a fictional advertising image with greenwashing.
Findings: It was observed that the situation of greater consumer criticality occurred with the presence of both attention and skepticism, the opposite also being true, that is, lesser criticality (or greater vulnerability) of consumer was detected when both attention (pre-attention) and skepticism were absent. These results were found in the three investigated variables: green associations, image evaluation, and judgment about the greenwashing practice.
Research implications: It has, as a contribution, not only the investigation of fairly unexplored constructs but also the combination and study in a connected way, bringing to the discussion the cognitive processes involved in the reception, processing, registration, and recovery of stimuli, especially in relation to the process of attention, and linking them to the practice of greenwashing.
Practical implications: Managing implications can be seen from three main perspectives: organization, consumers, and government, all related to the importance and need for greater awareness.
Originality/value: The study provided an unprecedented understanding of the role of two important cognitive processes (attention and skepticism) in consumer behavior in reaction to the practice of greenwashing.
Downloads
References
Albayrak, T., Caber, M., Moutinho, L., & Herstein, R. (2011). The influence of skepticism on green purchase behavior. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(13), 189-197.
Andreoli, T. P., & Nogueira, A. C. V. (2021). Falsos discursos mercadológicos. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, 15(2), 69-87.
Andreoli, T. P., Crespo, A., & Minciotti, S. (2017). What has been (short) written about greenwashing: a bibliometric research and a critical analysis of the articles found regarding this theme. Environmental & Social Management Journal/Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 11(2).
Andreoli, T. P., Lima, V. A., & Prearo, L. C. (2017). A (in) eficácia dos selos verdes sobre o comportamento dos consumidores: um estudo experimental. Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Administrativa, 16(1), 62-79.
Andreoli, T. P., Costa, E. D. S., & Prearo, L. C. (2022). Consumer judgment on the practice of greenwashing: scale development and validation. BBR. Brazilian Business Review, 19, 508-524.
Andreoli, T. P., Veloso, A. R., & Batista, L. L. (2016). Atenção no processamento de marcas: Uma análise das memórias explícita e implícita dos indivíduos receptores à luz do nível de atenção dirigido. Revista de Gestão, Finanças e Contabilidade, 6(2).
Braga Junior, S. S., Merlo, E. M., & da Silva, D. (2016). “Não acredito em consumo verde”: o reflexo do ceticismo no comportamento de compra do consumidor. Environmental & Social Management Journal/Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 10(3).
Bargh, J. A., & Morsella, E. (2008). The unconscious mind. Perspectives on psychological science, 3(1), 73-79.
Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63(4), 545.
Budinsky, J., & Bryant, S. (2013). It's not easy being green": The greenwashing of environmental discourses in advertising. Canadian Journal of Communication, 38(2), 207-226.
Campbell, M. C., & Keller, K. L. (2003). Brand familiarity and advertising repetition effects. Journal of consumer research, 30(2), 292-304.
Carbone, V., & Moatti, V. (2011). Towards greener supply chains: an institutional perspective. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 14(3), 179-197.Chan, L. K. H., & Hayward, W. G. (2013). Visual search. WIREs Cognitive Science, 4(4), 415–429.
Chatterjee, P. (2012). The role of varying information quantity in ads on immediate and enduring cross-media synergies. Journal of Marketing Communications, 18(3), 217-240.
Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of business ethics, 114(3), 489-500.
De Weerd, P. (2003). Attention, neural basis of. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (Vol. 1, pp. 238–246). London: Nature Publishing Group.Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt brace Jovanovich college publishers.
Fang, X., Singh, S., & Ahluwalia, R. (2007). An examination of different explanations for the mere exposure effect. Journal of consumer research, 34(1), 97-103.
Freitas Netto, S. V., Sobral, M. F. F., Ribeiro, A. R. B., & Soares, G. R. D. L. (2020). Concepts and forms of greenwashing: A systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe, 32(1), 1-12.
Guerreiro, J., Rita, P., & Trigueiros, D. (2015). Attention, emotions and cause-related marketing effectiveness. European Journal of marketing, 49(11/12), 1728-1750.
Gonçalves, J., Santos, A. R., Kieling, A. P., & Tezza, R. (2022). The influence of environmental engagement in the decision to purchase sustainable cosmetics: An analysis using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 15, 541-562.
Guo, R., Tao, L., Li, C. B., & Wang, T. (2017). A path analysis of greenwashing in a trust crisis among Chinese energy companies: The role of brand legitimacy and brand loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 523-536.
Hair Jr., J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2009) Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 761.
Holden, S. J., & Vanhuele, M. (1999). Know the name, forget the exposure: Brand familiarity versus memory of exposure context. Psychology & Marketing, 16(6), 479-496.Janiszewski, C. (1993). Preattentive mere exposure effects. Journal of Consumer research, 20(3), 376-392.
Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 151-165.
Lovato, M. L. (2013). Greenwashing no Brasil: quando a sustentabilidade ambiental se resume a um rótulo. Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM, 8, 162-171.
Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2013). Tweetjacked: The impact of social media on corporate greenwash. Journal of business ethics, 118(4), 747-757.
Macdonald, E., & Sharp, B. (2003). Management perceptions of the importance of brand awareness as an indication of advertising effectiveness (Doctoral dissertation, Massey University, Department of Marketing).
Markham, D., Khare, A., & Beckman, T. (2014). Greenwashing: a proposal to restrict its spread. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 16(04), 1450030.
Matejek, S., & Gössling, T. (2014). Beyond legitimacy: A case study in BP’s “green lashing”. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 571-584.
Matthes, J., Wonneberger, A., & Schmuck, D. (2014). Consumers' green involvement and the persuasive effects of emotional versus functional ads. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1885-1893.
Milosavljevic, M. (2007). The effects of preattention in an online advertising context: A neuroscience perspective. ProQuest.
Nyilasy, G., Gangadharbatla, H., & Paladino, A. (2014). Perceived greenwashing: The interactive effects of green advertising and corporate environmental performance on consumer reactions. Journal of business ethics, 125(4), 693-707.
Pacheco Junior, J. C. S., Damacena, C., & Bronzatti, R. (2015). Pré-ativação: o efeito priming nos estudos sobre o comportamento do consumidor. Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia, 15(1), 284-309.
Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of business ethics, 102(1), 15-28.
Pope, S., & Wæraas, A. (2016). CSR-washing is rare: A conceptual framework, literature review, and critique. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(1), 173-193.
Rahman, I., Park, J., & Chi, C. G. Q. (2015). Consequences of “greenwashing”: Consumers’ reactions to hotels’ green initiatives. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(6), 1054-1081.
Rossini, J. C., & Galera, C. (2008). Seleção e análise de estímulos na tarefa de busca visual. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 21, 20-27.
Ryu, G., Lim, E. A. C., Tan, L. T. L., & Han, Y. J. (2007). Preattentive processing of banner advertisements: The role of modality, location, and interference. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(1), 6-18.
Shapiro, S., MacInnis, D. J., & Heckler, S. E. (1997). The effects of incidental ad exposure on the formation of consideration sets. Journal of consumer research, 24(1), 94-104.
Shapiro, S., & Krishnan, H. S. (2001). Memory-based measures for assessing advertising effects: A comparison of explicit and implicit memory effects. Journal of advertising, 30(3), 1-13.
Sternberg, R. J. (2000) Psicologia Cognitiva. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.
Walker, K., & Wan, F. (2012). The harm of symbolic actions and green-washing: Corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. Journal of business ethics, 109, 227-242.
Wolfe, J. M., Treisman, A., & Horowitz, T. S. (2003). What shall we do with the preattentive processing stage: Use it or lose it. Journal of Vision, 3(9), 572.
Wu, M. C. (2014). The effects of task demand and web information type on recognition of verbal emotional advertising.
Yoo, C. Y. (2008). Unconscious processing of web advertising: Effects on implicit memory, attitude toward the brand, and consideration set. Journal of interactive marketing, 22(2), 2-18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Administração da UFSM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal remains the copyright holders of articles published. In order to be published, authors must sign the Copyrights Letter, which is sent to the authors by e-mail, thus granting rights, including on translation, to ReA/UFSM. The journal grants third parties the right to use, reproduce, and share the article according to the Creative Commons license agreement (CC-BY 4.0), as stated in the article’s PDF documents.
