Desarmamento nuclear no Direito Internacional: novos discursos, velhas angústias
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2357797530638Keywords:
Nuclear Weapons. Nuclear Disarmament. Nuclear tests. Treaty on the NonProliferation of Nuclear Weapons. International Court of Justice. Marshall IslandsAbstract
This paper aims at discussing nuclear disarmament from the perspective of the obligations assumed by states at the international level, especially in the sixties, since it is still a current theme in international fora, not only because of the environmental damage that such weapons can cause as punctually noted by the International Court of Justice in an advisory opinion, but also for the ongoing conservation of such weapons by states, as prescribed by the Republic of the Marshall Islands recent application brought before the Hague Court against nine major nuclear powers. Thus, at first, the current status of nuclear weapons will be reflected, in order to explain its emergence and development by countries over the years. Subsequently, the text will address the emergence of international treaties on the topic, chiefly the treaty of non-proliferation, displaying the international obligations that it entails. Further on, the way that that these obligations are handled by international law, in particular by the International Court of Justice in its judgments and opinions over the years, will be addressed, so as to reflect not only the constant concern of the international community to this issue but also to illustrate a transformation of the legal argument itself, whose aim, however, is still the same – the actual reduction of these weapons.Downloads
References
AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE. “EUA anunciam nesta terça-feira forte redução de seu arsenal nuclear”. In: UOL Notícias. 05 de abr. 2010. Disponível em: http://noticias.bol.uol.com.br/internacional/2010/04/05/eua-anunciam-nesta-terca-feira-forte-reducao-de-seu-arsenal-nuclear.jhtm. Acesso em: 09 de junho de 2014.
AMORIM, Arthur. ¿Y agora Fidel? Cuba: uma viagem ao passado, ao presente e ao futuro desta ilha tão polêmica. São Paulo: Conex, 2005.
BARROS, Renata Furtado; LARA, Paula Maria Tecles (Orgs.). Direitos Humanos: um debate contemporâneo. Carolina do Norte: Lulu Publishing, 2012.
BBC. “1996: France halts nuclear testing”. In: BBC. 29 jan. 1996. Disponível em: http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/january/29/newsid_466500 0/4665676.stm. Acesso em: 10 de junho de 2014.
BOCZEK, Boleslaw. International Law: a dictionary. Maryland: Scarecrow Press, 2005.
CALVOCORESSI, Peter. World Politics since 1945. London: Routledge, 2009.
CANÇADO TRINDADE, Antônio Augusto. A Humanização do Direito Internacional. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey, 2006.
CIRINCIONE, Joseph. Bomb Scare: the history and future of nuclear weapons. NYC: Columbia University Press, 2007.
CNN. “Nuclear weapons: who has what?” In: CNN. s/d. Disponível em: http://edition.cnn.com/in teractive/2013/03/world/nuclear-weapon-states/. Acesso em: 19 de junho de 2014.
COHEN, Avner; LEE, Steven. Nuclear Weapons and the Future of Humanity. New Jersey: Rowman & Allanheld, 1986.
DE CASTRO, F. Dissenting Opinion Nuclear Tests. (New Zealand v. France, 1973) Proferido em 20 dez. 1974. Disponível em: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/59/6173.pdf. Acesso em: 19 de junho de 2013.
DIAS, Reinaldo. Relações Internacionais: introdução ao estudo da sociedade global. São Paulo: Atlas, 2010.
FALCO, Tish. French Nuclear Tests in Pacific South. 2007. Disponível em: http://www1.american.edu/ted/ice/mururoa.htm. Acesso em: 19 de junho de 2014.
GANSER, Daniele. “Há 40 anos a crise dos mísseis”. In: Le Monde Diplomatique. 01 nov. 2002. Disponível em: http://www.diplomatique.org.br/acervo.p hp?id=481. Acesso em: 19 de junho de 2014.
GERSON, Joseph. Empire and the Bomb: how the U.S. uses nuclear weapons to dominate the world. London: Pluto Press, 2007.
GOLDBERG, Alfred. “The Atomic Origins of the British Nuclear Deterrent”. In: International Affairs, Londres, v. 40, n. 3, jul., 1964, pp. 409-429.
GUSTERSON, Hugh. Nuclear Rites: a weapons laboratory at the end of the cold war. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.
ITUASSU, Arthur. “Apresentação à edição brasileira”. In: DALLEK, Robert; GOLWAY, Terry. Uma visão de paz. Rio de Janeiro, Jorge Zahar, 2007.
KELLERHALS JUNIOR, Merle David. Estados Unidos revelam tamanho de arsenal nuclear. s/d. Disponível em: http://www.embaixadaamericana.org.br/arc-index.php?act ion=materia&id=8961&submenu=&itemmenu=21. Acesso em: 16 de junho de 2014.
KOYRÉ, Alexander. Estudos de História do Pensamento Científico. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Forense, 1991.
LAFER, Celso. Comércio, desarmamento, direitos humanos: reflexões sobre uma experiência diplomática. 2ª edição. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2006.
LEBARON, Wayne D. America's Nuclear Legacy. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 1998.
LOWY, Michael; BENSAÏD, Daniel. Marxismo, Modernidade e Utopia. São Paulo: Xamã, 2000
LUKASHUK, I. “The Principle of Pacta Sunt Servanda and the Nature of Obligation in International Law”. In: American Journal of International Law, v. 83, n. 3, jul., 1989, pp. 513-518.
LULAT, Y. United States Relations with South Africa. NYC: Peter Lang Publishing, 2008.
MASON, John W. The Cold War: 1945-1991. London: Routledge, 1996.
MIKHAILOV, V. N. (ed.). Catalog of Worldwide Nuclear Testing. NYC: Begell Public House, 1999.
MOCKAITIS, Thomas R. The Iraq War Enciclopedia. California: Thomas R Editor, 2003.
MURRAY, Raymond. Energia Nuclear: uma introdução aos conceitos, sistemas e aplicações dos processos nucleares. Brasil: Hemus, 2004.
NORRIS, Robert S.; KRISTENSEN, Hans M. “Global nuclear weapons inventories, 1945-2010”. In: Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Chicago, v. 66, n. 4, s/d., pp.77-83.
ONU. Ending Nuclear Tests. Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. s/d. Disponível em: http://www.un.org/en/events/against nucleartestsday/history.shtml. Acesso em: 19 de junho de 2014.
__________. Tratado do Antártico. 1961.
__________. Acordo sobre a Proibição Parcial de Testes Nucleares. 1963.
__________. Tratado sobre Princípios governando as Atividades dos Estados na Exploração e Uso do Espaço. 1967.
__________. Tratado de Não Proliferação de Armas Nucleares. 1968.
__________. Declaração de Estocolmo sobre o Meio Ambiente Humano. 1972.
__________. Declaração do Rio de Janeiro sobre Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento. 1992
__________. Tratado para a Proibição Completa de Testes Nucleares. 1996.
PANDE, Savita. The future of NPT. United Kingdom: Lancer Publishers & Distributors, 1995.
PARK, Patricia D. Energy Law and the Environment. London: Taylor & Francis, 2002.
SAGAN, Scott D.; WALTZ, Kenneth N. The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed. NYC: W.W. Norton, 2002.
STÜRCHLER, Nikolas. The Threat of Force in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
US DEPARTMENT OF STATE. Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under Water. s/d. Disponível em: http://www.state.gov/t/isn/4797.htm. Acesso em: 16 de junho de 2014.
WEERAMANTRY, Christopher. Dissenting Opinion.Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict. Proferida em 8 jul. 1996. Disponível em: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/93/7417.pdf. Acesso em: 19 de junho de 2013.
WOLOSZYN, André Luís. Guerra nas sombras: os bastidores dos serviços secretos internacionais. São Paulo: Contexto, 2013.
ZINN, Howard. On War. NYC: Seven Sotires Press, 2011.