Towards an integrated science of aesthetics: Getting rid of the main misunderstandings in evolutionary aesthetics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179219439295Keywords:
Key words, interdisciplinarity, evolution, niche, epigenetics, Darwin, epistemology.Abstract
Evolutionary Aesthetics is a bourgeoning and thriving sub-field of Aesthetics, the main aim of which is “the importation of aesthetics into natural sciences, and especially its integration into the heuristic of Darwin’s evolutionary theory.” Notwithstanding the growing popularity in the past two decades, a look into the state of current research in Evolutionary Aesthetics suggests a significant degree of haziness in the field from both epistemological-methodological and theoretical points of view. The main aim of the present paper is to evaluate consistency and coherence of the Evolutionary Aesthetics’ research programme against the background of Boix Mansilla’s epistemic criteria for interdisciplinary research programmes, and to assess the potential of epigenetics and niche construction theory as two new promising research avenues in a revised, updated Evolutionary Aesthetics.
Downloads
References
AVANESSIAN A.; MENNINGHAUS W.; VÖLKER J. (Eds.). Vita aesthetica. Szenarien ästhetischer Lebendigkeit. Zürich-Berlin: Diaphanes, 2009.
BARKOW J. H.; COSMIDES L.; TOOBY J. (Eds.). The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
BELL., C.; FREDERICK A. Art. New York: Stokes Company, 1914.
BOIX MANSILLA'S. V. Interdisciplinary Work at the Frontier: An Empirical investigation of Expert Interdisciplinary Epistemologies. Issues in Integrative Studies, n. 24, p. 1-31, 2006a.
______. Symptoms of Quality – Assessing Interdisciplinary Work at the Frontier: An Empirical Exploration. Research Evaluation, n.15, v.1, p. 17-29, 2006b.
BOLHUIS et al. Darwin in Mind: New Opportunities for Evolutionary Psychology. PLoS Biology, n.9, v.7, e1001109, 2011.
BRIEBER et al. Art in Time and Space: Context Modulates the Relation Between Art Experience and Viewing Time. PLoS ONE, n.9, v.6, e99019, 2014.
BULLER, D. Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005.
BURKE E. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. Oxford: Oxford University Press, [1757] 1998.
BUSS, D. The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. London: Wiley, 2005.
CAREY, N. The Epigenetics Revolution. How Modern Biology Is Rewriting Our Understanding of Genetics, Disease and Inheritance. London: Icon Books, 2011.
CARROLL, J. Literary Darwinism: Evolution, Human Nature, and Literature. London-New York: Routledge, 2004.
______. The Adaptive Function of the Arts: Alternative Evolutionary Hypotheses. In: C. Gansel, D., Vanderbeke (Eds.). Telling Stories: Literature and Evolution. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012, p. 50-63.
______. Dutton, Davies and Imaginative Virtual Worlds: The Current State of Evolutionary Aesthetics. Aisthesis. Pratiche, linguaggi e saperi dell’estetico, n.6, v.2, p. 81-93, 2013.
CHANGEUX, J.-P. L’homme neuronal. Paris: Fayard, 1983.
CHATTERJEE, A. The Aesthetic Brain. How We Evolved to Desire Beauty and Enjoy Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
CROFT J. The Challenges of Interdisciplinary Epistemology in Neuroaesthetics. Mind, Brain and Education, n.5, v.1, p. 5-11, 2011.
DARWIN, C.R. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray, 1859.
______. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray, 1871.
DAVIES, S. The Artful Species. Aesthetics, Art and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
DEACON, T. A Role for Relaxed Selection in the Evolution of the Language Capacity. PNAS, n.107, v.2, p. 9000-9006, 2010.
DEHAENE S. Les Neurones de la lecture. Paris: Édition Odile Jacob, 2007.
D'ERRICO F. HENSHILWWOD, C.S. Homo Symbolicus: The Dawn of Language, Imagination and Spirituality. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, 2011.
DESIDERI, F. On The Epigenesis of the Aesthetic Mind. The Sense of Beauty from Survival to Supervenience. Rivista di estetica, n.54, v.3, p. 63-82, 2013.
______. Epigenesis and Deduction of the Aesthetic Judgement. Before and Beyond the Old Dichotomy. Paper presented at the VIth Mediterranean Congress of Aesthetics, Florence, June 24th-28th, 2014.
DEWEY, J. Art as Experience. New York: Putnam, 1934.
DIAS, B.G., RESSLER, K.J. Parental Olfactory Experience Influences Behavior and Neural Structure in Subsequent Generations. Nature Neuroscience, n.9, December, 2013.
DISSANAYAKE, E. What Is Art For? Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1988.
______. Homo aestheticus. Where Art Comes From and Why, New York: Free Press, 1992.
______. A Bona Fide Ethological View of Art: The Artification Hypothesis. In.: C. Sütterlin, W. Schiefenhövel, ed., C. Lehmann, J. Forster, G. Apfelauer (Eds.). Art As Behaviour: An Ethological Approach to Visual and Verbal Art, Music and Architecture. Hanse Studies, n.10, BIS Verlag Oldenburg, p. 42-60, 2014.
DUTTON D. The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, and Human Evolution. New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2009.
GOULD, S.J., VRBA, E. Exaptation. A Missing term in the Science of Form. Paleobiology, n.8, p. 4-15, 1982.
GOULD S.J. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002.
HUME, D. On the Standard of Taste. Cambridge: LibertyClassics, [1757] 1987.
JABLONKA, E., LAMB, M. Evolution in Four Dimensions. Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2005.
KANT, I. Kritik der Urteilskraft. Stuttgart: Reclam, [1790] 1986.
KAWABATA, H., ZEKI S. Neural Correlates of Beauty. Journal of Neurophysiology, n.91, p. 1699-1705, 2004.
KOHN, D. The Aesthetic Construction of Darwin's Theory. In.: Tauber A. The Elusive Synthesis. Aesthetics and Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996, p. 13-48.
LEDER, H., BELKE, B., OEBERST, A., Augustin, D. A Model of Aesthetic Appreciation and Aesthetic Judgements. British Journal of Psychology, n.95, p. 489-508, 2004.
LEDER, H. Next Steps in Neuroaesthetics: Which Processes and Processing Stages to Study? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, n.7, p. 27-37, 2013.
LEDER, H., NADAL, M. Ten Years of a Model of Aesthetic Appreciation and Aesthetic Judgments: The Aesthetic Episode – Developments and Challenges in Empirical Aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, p. 443-464, 2014.
LEWIS D., RUSSELL E., AL-SHAWAF L., BUSS D. Lumbar Curvature: a Previously Undiscovered Standard of Attractiveness. Evolution and Human Bahavior, in press, 2015.
MANDRIOLI, M. Not By our Genes Alone. Aisthesis. Pratiche, linguaggi e saperi dell’estetico, n.6, v.2, p. 21-29, 2013.
MENARY, R. The Aesthetic Niche: Commentary on The Artful Species. British Journal of Aesthetics, n.54, v.4, p. 471-475, 2014.
MENNINGHAUS, W. Biology à la mode: Charles Darwin's Aesthetics of “Ornament”. History and philosophy of life sciences, n.31, p. 263-278, 2009.
MENNINGHAUS, W. Wozu Kunst? Ästhetik nach Darwin. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2011.
MILLER, G. F. The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. New York: Doubleday, 2000.
MITHEN, S. The Prehistory of Mind. A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion and Science. London: Thames and Hudson, 1996.
MOSING, Miriam A. et al. Did Sexual Selection Shape Human Music? Testing Predictions from the Sexual Selection Hypothesis of Music Evolution Using a Large Genetically Informative Sample of Over 1.000 Twins. “Evolution and Human Behavior”, n. 36/5, p. 359-366, September 2015.
ODLING-SMEE, F. J.; LALAND, K. N.; FELDMAN M. W. Niche Construction. The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton Oxford : Princeton University Press, 2003.
ORIANS, G. H. An Ecological and Evolutionary Approach to Landscape Aesthetics. In: Penning-Rowsell E. C., Lowenthal D. (Eds.). Landscape Meanings and Values. London : Allen and Unwin, 1986, p. 3-25.
PANKSEPP, J.; BIVEN, L. The Archeology of Mind. Neuroevolutionary Origins of Humans Emotions. New York London : W. W. Norton & Company, 2012.
PIGLIUCCI, M.; MÜLLER, G. B. Evolution. The Extended Synthesis. Cambridge (MA) : The MIT Press, 2010.
PINKER, S. How the Mind Works. New York London : W. W. Norton & Company, 1997. PRUM, R. Aesthetic Evolution by Mate Choice: Darwin's Really Dangerous Idea. “Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences”, n. 367, p. 2253-2265, 2012.
RASSOULZADEGAN, M. et al. RNA-mediated Non-mendelian Inheritance of An Epigenetic Change in the Mouse. “Nature”, n. 441, p. 469-474, 2006.
RICHARDSON, R. C. Evolutionary Psychology as Maladapted Psychology. Cambridge (MA) : The MIT Press, 2007.
ROTHENBERG, D. The Survival of the Beautiful. Art, Science and Evolution. London : Bloomsbury, 2011.
SCHELLEKENS, E.; GOLDIE, P. (Eds.). The Aesthetic Mind: Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2011.
SCHER, S.; RAUSCHER, M. (Eds.). Evolutionary Psychology: Alternative approaches. Berlin : Springer, 2003.
SZYF, M. Lamarck Revisited: Epigenetic Inheritance of Ancestral Odor Fear Conditioning, “Nature Neuroscience”, n. 17, p. 2-4, doi: 10.1038/ nn.3603, 2014.
TOOBY, J.; COSMIDES L. Does Beauty Build Adapted Minds? Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Aesthetics, Fiction and Arts. “SubStance”, n. 94/95, p. 6-27, 2001.
VOLAND, E.; GRAMMER, K. (Eds.). Evolutionary Aesthetics. Berlin : Springer, 2003. VOLAND, E.; RUSCH, H. Evolutionary Aesthetics: an Introduction to Key Concepts and Current Issues. “Aisthesis.
Pratiche, linguaggi e saperi dell’estetico”, n. 6/2, p. 113-133, 2013.
WELSCH, W. Animal Aesthetics. “Contemporary Aesthetics”, n. 2, 2004 (on-line: last accessed: april 2019).
WELSCH, W. Blickwechsel. Neue Wege der Aesthetik, Stuttgart, Reclam, 2012.
ZEKI, S. A Vision of the Brain. Oxford : Blackwell, 1993.
ZEKI, S. Splendors and Miseries of the Brain: Love, Creativity, and the Quest for Human Happiness. Oxford : Blackwell, 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ficam concedidos a Fragmentum todos os direitos autorais referentes aos trabalhos publicados. Os originais não devem ter sido publicados ou submetidos simultaneamente a outro periódico e não serão devolvidos. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não comerciais.
