Transformations in international productive structure and impacts on Brazilian industry: an analysis from technological perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1414650934743Keywords:
Structural transformation, Global production networks, Catching upAbstract
The aim of this paper is to analyze the transformations of the Brazilian industry in perspective compared to Germany, China, the United States, Japan and Mexico, with emphasis on the technological dimension. It is argued that such transformations should be understood as deriving from the phenomenon of global production networks and increasing production displacement for Asian countries with low production cost. It is also admitted that the process has conditioned the possibilities of industrial development of the countries, including Brazil. As main results, it was observed that China began to industrialize by receiving stages of the global manufacturing process, fragmented in global production networks. Industrialized countries such as Germany, Japan and the USA have gone through a process of deindustrialization in the recent period, defined by specialized literature as normal. In the same sense, Brazil and Mexico go through a process of deindustrialization understood in the literature as precocious, since they did not reach a considerable degree of development. This paper concluded that in the Brazilian case, there is technological backwardness, especially in sectors typical of the microelectronic paradigm, in addition to observing an increase in the productivity gap that has led the Brazilian economy to a falling behind path.
Downloads
References
ABRAMOVITZ, M. Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. The Journal of Economic History, v. 46, n. 02, p. 385-406, 1986.
AREND, M. A industrialização do Brasil ante a nova divisão internacional do trabalho. Texto para Discussão, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA), 2015.
AREND, M.; CEZAR, P.; FONSECA, D. 25 anos de catching up , 25 anos de falling behind. Revista de Economia Política, v. 32, n. 126, p. 33–54, 2012.
CARNEIRO, R. Desenvolvimento em crise: a economia brasileira no último quarto do século XX. Unesp, 2002.
CHANDLER, A. D. Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge, Mass, 1990.
COHEN, W. M.; LEVINTHAL, D. A. Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, v. 99, n. 397, p. 569-596, set. 1989.
COUTINHO, L. A terceira revolução industrial e tecnológica: as grandes tendências de mudança. Economia e sociedade, v. 1, n. 8, p. 69-87, 1992.
CROTTY, J. “The effects of increased product market competition and changes in financial markets on the performance of Nonfinancial Corporations in the neoliberal era”. PERI Working paper, n. 44, 2002.
ERNST, D.; KIM, L. “Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation”. Research Policy, n. 31, p. 1417-1429, 2002.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION – EC. European Competitiveness Report: Towards Knowledge-driven Reindustrialisation. Commission Staff Working Document, 2013.
FURTADO, A. T.; CARVALHO, R. Q. Padrões de intensidade tecnológica da indústria brasileira: um estudo comparativo com os países centrais. São Paulo em Perspectiva, v. 19, n. 1, p. 70-84, 2005.
GEREFFI, G. Development Models and Industrial Upgrading in China and Mexico. European Sociological Review, v. 25, n. 1, p. 37–51, 2009.
GEREFFI, G. International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of international economics, v. 48, n. 1, p. 37-70, 1999.
GEREFFI, G; HUMPHREY, J; STURGEON, T. The governance of global value chains. Review of international political economy, v. 12, n. 1, p. 78-104, 2005.
LAZONICK, W. From Innovation to Financialization: How Shareholder Value Ideology is Destroying the US Economy. 2011. Disponível em http://www.theairnet.org/files/research/lazonick/Lazonick%20Innovation%20Financialization%2020110616.pdf. Acesso em 29 nov. 2015
LAZONICK, W. The Chandlerian corporation and the theory of innovative enterprise. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 19, n. 2, p. 317-349, 2010.
LAZONICK, W; O’SULLIVAN, M. Maximizing shareholder value: a new ideology for corporate governance. Economy and society, v. 29, n. 1, p. 13-35, 2000.
MOWERY, D.C.; ROSENBERG, N. Trajetórias da Inovação: a mudança tecnológica nos EUA no século XX. Campinas, SP: Editora da UNICAMP, 2005.
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. A New Economy?: The Changing Role of Innovation and Information Technology in Growth. OECD Publishing, 2000.
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT - OECD. Structural Adjustment and Economic Performance. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1987.
PALMA, J. G. Quatro fontes de desindustrialização e um novo conceito de doença holandesa. In: Conferência de Industrialização, desindustrialização e desenvolvimento. Federação das Indústrias do Estado de São Paulo, 2005.
PEREZ, C. Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge journal of economics, v.34, n.1, p.185-202, 2010.
PEREZ, Carlota. Techno-economic paradigms: essays in honour of Carlota Perez. Anthem Press, 2011.
ROWTHORN, R.; WELLS, J. R. De-industrialisation and Foreign Trade. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1987
STURGEON, T. J. Modular Production Networks: A New American Model of Industrial Organization. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 11, n. 3, p. 451- 496, 2002.
TREGENNA, F. Characterising deindustrialisation: An analysis of changes in manufacturing employment and output internationally. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 33, n. 3, p. 433-466, 2008.
UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT – UNCTAD. Trade and Development Report: Structural transformation for inclusive and sustained growth. United Nations: New York and Geneva, 2016. 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The journal reserves the right of making changes in the originals in a normative order, orthographic and grammatical, with the objective of maintaining the language cult pattern, respecting the authors success. The final tests will not be sent to the authors. The published papers become the Economics and Development propriety. The opinions issued by the article’s authors are their own responsibility.