Normas sociais, preferências endógenas e ação governamental
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1414650969445Palavras-chave:
Análise Econômica do Direito, Normas Sociais, Preferências Endógenas, GovernoResumo
O artigo tem como proposta revisitar a literatura de normas sociais e Law and Economics e oferecer uma distinção metodológica das diferentes formas pelas quais as normas sociais são abordadas nesta literatura. Ademais, discute-se como as diferenças nas concepções de normas sociais, principalmente aquelas que tratam as normas sociais como capazes de alterar as preferências individuais, afetam a forma pela qual o governo deve atuar.
Downloads
Referências
AKERLOF, G. A.; KRANTON, R. E. Economics and Identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 115, no 3, p. 715-753, 2000.
BECKER, G. S. Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, v. 76, no 2, p. 169-217, 1968.
BOWLES, S. Endogenous Preferences: The cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, JSTOR, v. 36, no 1, p. 75-111, 1998.
BRITES, M.; ALMEIDA, F.; MARIN, S. R. Economia e Identidade no Século XXI: as contribuições de Akerlof e Kraton, Sen e Davis. Análise Econômica, v. 37, no 74, p. 203-225, 2019.
CASTRO, A. S. R. Ensaios sobre Preferências. Tese (Doutorado) – Universidade Estadual de Campinas, p. 1-127, 2019.
COOTER, R. Expressive Law and Economics. The Journal of Legal Studies, v. 27, no 2, p. 585-607, 1998.
COOTER, R. Do Good Laws Make Good Citizens? An economic analysis of internalized norms. Virginia Law Review, v. 86, no 8, p. 1577-1601, 2000a.
COOTER, R. Three Effects of Social Norms on Law: expression, deterrence, and internalization. Oregon Law Review, v. 79, p. 1-12, 2000b.
DAVIS, J. B. Identity and Individual Economic Agents: a narrative approach. Review of Social Economy, v. 67, no 1, p. 71-94, 2009.
DEQUECH, D. Institutions, Social Norms, and Decision-Theoretic Norms. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, v. 72, no 1, p. 70-78, 2009.
ELLICKSON, R. The Market for Social Norms. American Law and Economics Review, v. 3, no 1, p. 1-49, 2001.
ELSTER, J. Social Norms and Economic Theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 3, no 4, p. 99-117, 1989.
ETZIONI, A. Social Norms: Internalization, persuasion, and history. Law and Society Review, JSTOR, v. 34, no 1, p. 157-178, 2000.
FREY, B. S. Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Cheltenham, UK: Edgar Elgar Publishing, 1997.
FUNK, P. Governmental Action, Social Norms, and Criminal Behavior. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, JSTOR, v. 161, no 3, p. 522-535, 2005.
HAUSMAN, D.; MCPHERSON, M. Preference Satisfaction and Welfare Economics. Economics & Philosophy, v. 25, no 1, p. 1-25, 2009.
KAHAN, D. Social Influence, Social Meaning, and Deterrence. Virginia Law Review, HeinOnline, v. 83, no 2, p. 349-395, 1997.
KAHAN, D. Social Meaning and the Economic Analysis of Crime. The Journal of Legal Studies, v. 27, no 2, p. 609-622, 1998.
LAZZARINI, S.; MILLER, G.; ZENGER, T. Order with some Law: Complementarity versus substitution of formal and informal arrangements. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, v. 20, no 2, p. 261-298, p. 2004.
LESSIG, L. Social Meaning and Social Norms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, v. 144, p. 2181-2189, 1996.
LICHT, A. Social Normas and the Law: Why people obey the law? Review of Law & Economics, v. 4, no 3, p. 715-750, 2008.
MCADAMS, R.; RASMUSEN, E. Norms in Law and Economics. Kelley School of Business Working Paper, p. 1-49, 2004.
MCCLOSKEY, H. A non-utilitarian approach to punishment. Inquiry, v. 8, p. 249-263, 1965.
POSNER, E. Standards, Rules, and Social Norms. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, HeinOnline, v. 21, p. 101-117, 1997a.
POSNER, R. Social Norms and the Law: An economic approach. The American Economic Review, JSTOR, v. 87, no 2, p. 365-369, 1997b.
RACHLINSKI, J. J. The Limits of Social Norms. Chicago-Kent Law Review, HeinOnline, v. 74, p. 1537-1567, 1998.
RASMUSEN, E.; POSNER, R. Creating and Enforcing Norms, with special reference to sanctions. John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper, no 96, Law School, University of Chicago, p. 369-382, 2000.
SAMUELSON, P. A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer’s Behavior. Economica, JSTOR, v. 5, no 17. p. 61-71, 1938.
SATZ, D.; FEREJOHN, J. Rational Choice and Social Theory. The Journal of Philosophy, JSTOR, v. 91, no 2, 71-87, 1994.
SEN, A. Economic Methodology: Heterogeneity and Relevance. Social Research, v.71, no 3, p. 583-614, 2004.
SEN, A. Identity and Violence: The illusion of Destiny. London, Editora: Penguin, 2006.
STIGLER, G.; BECKER, G. De Gustibus non est Disputandum. The American Economic Review, JSTOR, v. 67, no 2, p. 76-90, 1977.
STROTZ, R. H. Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization. The Review of Economic Studies, JSTOR, v. 23, no 3, p. 165-180, 1955.
SUNSTEIN, C. R. Social Norms and Social Roles. Columbia Law Review, HeinOnline, v. 96, p. 903-968, 1996.
WEISBROD, B. A. Comparing Utility Function in Efficiency Terms, or what kind of utility function do we want? The American Economic Review, JSTOR, v. 67, no 5, p. 991-995, 1977.
YAARI, M. Endogenous Changes in Tastes: A philosiphical discussion. Erkenntnis, v. 11, no 2, p. 157-196, 1975.
ZASU, Y. Sanctions by Social Norms and the Law: Substitutes or complements? The Journal of Legal Studies, v. 36, no 2, p. 379-396, 2007.
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Economia e Desenvolvimento
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da lingua, respeitando, porém, o exito dos autores. As provas finais não serão enviadas aos autores. Os trabalhos publicados passam a ser propriedade da revista Economia e Desenvolvimento. Deve ser consignada a fonte de publicação original. Os originais não serão devolvidos aos autores. As opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos artigos são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.
