Temporal analysis of the impact of air quality on the relative risk of mortality in the population of the Southern region of Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X91829Keywords:
Air pollution, Risk assessment, Health impact, Particulate matter, AirQAbstract
Calculations to estimate the Relative Risk (RR) of air pollution on the exposed population are essential to create strategies for reducing deaths. This study aimed to perform a temporal analysis of atmospheric pollutants and mortality indicators, assessing the influence of air quality on RR in the Região Metropolitana de Porto Alegre (RMPA), Brazil. The ecological study was conducted between 2007 and 2021, using air quality data from FEPAM (State Enviromental Protection Foundation) and health data from DATASUS (Department of Informatics of the Brazilian Unified Health System). The mortality rates considered were: respiratory mortality in children under 5 years, all-cause mortality in all ages (PM10, short-term), and cardiopulmonary mortality in adults aged 30–59 years (PM2.5, long-term). These data were incorporated into AirQ+ through β coefficients, allowing the estimation of RR. Results indicated that pollution levels were above the WHO recommendations. The RR ranged from 1.00 for respiratory and all-cause mortality to 5.51 for cardiopulmonary mortality, with 217,311 deaths attributable to the particulate matter. Limitations include the dependence on secondary databases, the use of international coefficients, and restricted monitoring coverage. Local data gaps may compromise the results and reinforce the need to strengthen monitoring and studies to estimate the impacts of pollution.
Downloads
References
Arregocés, H. A., Rojano, R., & Restrepo, G. (2023). Health risk assessment for particulate matter: Application of AirQ+ model in the northern Caribbean region of Colombia. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 16(5), 897–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-023-01304-5
Atuyambe, L. M., Etajak, S., Walyawula, F., Kasasa, S., Nyabigambo, A., Bazeyo, W., Wipfli, H., Samet, J. M., & Berhane, K. T. (2024). Air quality and attributable mortality among city dwellers in Kampala, Uganda: Results from 4 years of continuous PM2.5 concentration monitoring using BAM 1022 reference instrument. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-024-00684-9
Brito, J., Bernardo, A., & Gonçalves, L. L. (2022). Atmospheric pollution and mortality in Portugal: Quantitative assessment of the environmental burden of disease using the AirQ+ model. Science of the Total Environment, 815, 152964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.152964
Cohen, A. J., Brauer, M., Burnett, R., Anderson, H. R., Frostad, J., Estep, K., Balakrishnan, K., Brunekreef, B., Dandona, L., Dandona, R., Feigin, V., Freedman, G., Hubbell, B., Jobling, A., Kan, H., Knibbs, L., Liu, Y., Martin, R., Morawska, L., & Forouzanfar, M. H. (2017). Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: An analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. The Lancet, 389(10082), 1907–1918. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6
Dhital, N. B., Sapkota, R. P., Sharjeel, A., & Yang, H. H. (2024). Estimating potentially preventable ambient PM2.5-attributable adult deaths by improving air quality in Nepal. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 15(8), 102175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2024.102175
European Environment Agency. (2023, November). Harm to human health from air pollution in Europe: Burden of disease 2023. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/harm-tohuman-health-from-air-pollution
European Environment Agency. (2022). Air quality in Europe 2022. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/air-quality-in-europe-2022
European Environment Agency. (2024, March 12). Os níveis de poluição atmosférica continuam a ser demasiado elevados em toda a Europa — continua a ser um grande risco ambiental para a saúde. https://www.eea.europa.eu/pt/highlights/os-niveis-de-poluicao-atmosferica-1
Franzin, B. T., Oliveira, A. A., Pereira, L. C., Costa, R. M., & Gomes, F. R. (2021). Characterization of particulate matter and its sources in an urban–industrial–agricultural region of São Paulo, Brazil. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 8, 692440. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.692440
Jacobson, L. S. V., Oliveira, T. S., Silva, M. E., Santos, R. A., & Carvalho, J. B. (2024). Estimation of PM2.5 concentrations in Salvador, Brazil, using PM10 measurements and regression models. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 27, e240027. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720240027
Kahraman, A. C., & Sivri, N. (2022). Comparison of metropolitan cities for mortality rates attributed to ambient air pollution using the AirQ model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(28), 43034–43047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18341-1
Kanat, O., Yan, Z., Erum, N., Asghar, M. M., Zaidi, S. A. H., & Said, J. (2024). How do air quality, economic growth and energy use affect life expectancy in the Republic of Kazakhstan? Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 17(3), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-023-01459-1
Kazemi, Z., Jonidi Jafari, A., Farzadkia, M., Amini, P., & Kermani, M. (2024). Evaluating the mortality and health rate caused by the PM2.5 pollutant in the air of several important Iranian cities and evaluating the effect of variables with a linear time series model. Heliyon, 10(6), e27862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27862
Leili, M., Bahrami Asl, F., Jamshidi, R., & Dehdar, A. (2023). Mortality and morbidity due to exposure to ambient air PM10 in Zahedan city, Iran: The AirQ model approach. Urban Climate, 49, 101493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101493
Miri, M., Ebrahimi Aval, H., Ehrampoush, M. H., Mohammadi, A., Toolabi, A., Nikonahad, A., Derakhshan, Z., & Abdollahnejad, A. (2017). Human health impact assessment of exposure to particulate matter: An AirQ software modeling. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(19), 16513–16519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9189-9
Nikoonahad, A., Naserifar, R., Alipour, V., Poursafar, A., Miri, M., Ghafari, H. R., Abdolahnejad, A., Nemati, S., & Mohammadi, A. (2017). Assessment of hospitalization and mortality from exposure to PM10 using AirQ modeling in Ilam, Iran. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(27), 21791–21796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9794-7
Nishikawa, H., Seposo, X. T., Madaniyazi, L., Kim, Y., Tobías, A., Yamagami, M., Kim, S. E., Takami, A., Sugata, S., Honda, Y., Ueda, K., Hashizume, M., & Ng, C. F. S. (2023). Longterm trends in mortality risk associated with short-term exposure to air pollution in 10 Japanese cities between 1977 and 2015. Environmental Research, 219, 115108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.115108
World Health Organization. (2004). Outdoor air pollution: Assessing the environmental burden of disease at national and local levels. Protection of the Human Environment.
Pala, K., Aykac, N., & Yasin, Y. (2021). Premature deaths attributable to long-term exposure to PM2.5 in Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 51940–51947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13923-5
Requia, W. J., Vicedo-Cabrera, A. M., Amini, H., & Schwartz, J. D. (2024). Short-term air pollution exposure and mortality in Brazil: Investigating the susceptible population groups. Environmental Pollution, 340, 122797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122797
Rodríguez, D., Cobo-Cuenca, A. I., & Quiles, R. (2022). Effects of air pollution on daily hospital admissions for cardiovascular diseases in Castilla-La Mancha, Spain: A region with moderate air quality. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 15(4), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-021-01144-1
Safari, Z., Fouladi-Fard, R., Vahedian, M., Mahmoudian, M. H., Rahbar, A., & Fiore, M. (2022). Health impact assessment and evaluation of economic costs attributed to PM2.5 air pollution using BenMAP-CE. International Journal of Biometeorology, 66(9), 1891–1902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-022-02330-1
Sicard, P., Khaniabadi, Y. O., Perez, S., Gualtieri, M., & De Marco, A. (2019). Effect of O3, PM10 and PM2.5 on cardiovascular and respiratory diseases in cities of France, Iran and Italy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(31), 32645–32665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06445-8
Silveira, C., Ferreira, J., & Miranda, A. I. (2024). Health impact pathways related to air quality changes: Testing two health risk methodologies over a local traffic case study. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 17(5), 1077–1089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-024-01504-7
Silveira, L. A., Martins, D. F., Rodrigues, P. C., & Lima, A. V. (2025). Seasonal variation of PM2.5/PM10 ratio in a coastal city of southern Brazil using low-cost sensors. Climate, 13(4), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13040071
Tavella, R. A., Souza, G. L., Ferreira, H. P., Andrade, C. P., & Almeida, R. M. (2024). Footprints of COVID-19 on PM2.5/PM10 ratio in a Brazilian tropical metropolis. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 27, e240018. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720240018
World Health Organization. (2019). AirQ+: Software tool for health risk assessment of air pollution. WHO Regional Office for Europe. https://www.who.int/europe/tools-and-toolkits/airq---software-tool-for-health-risk-assessment-of-air-pollution
World Health Organization. (2021). WHO global air quality guidelines: Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034228
Zhang, H., Yang, Z., Sun, H., Tiwari, P., Wu, J., Tang, N. J., & Yang, X. (2024). Changing patterns for cardiovascular disease and subtypes mortality attributable to ambient fine particulate matter pollution between China and India during 1990 to 2019. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 17(5), 921–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-023-01487-x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
