Web system for estimation of evapotranspiration potential by different methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X36937Keywords:
Evapotranspiration, Automation, WebAbstract
One of the parameters of the hydrological cycle that has great influence in water management and agricultural production is evapotranspiration. Finding ways to restore this amount of lost water to the ground is essential, whether from rain or irrigation techniques. In general, indirect methods are used to determine evapotranspiration, especially Penman-Monteith. However, the method requires a large number of variables, requiring the use of other indirect methods, less demanding in relation to the required data. Due to a great number of methods to be compared it is interesting to make use of computational tools that allow to automate these calculations. In the face of the problem, the development of a web application that calculates the reference evapotranspiration (ETo) in an automated way, from the several mathematical methods found in the literature, was glimpsed. The system provides the user with daily ETo results (mm / month) for a given period of time, as well as the daily average (mm / month), for the month, and monthly (mm / month) for a given month during the period, using up-to-date data from INMET-operated weather stations. The application facilitates the calculation process minimizing the estimation time and contributing to the analysis of the results by the user.Downloads
References
ALLEN, R.G. et al. Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Rome: FAO, 1998. 299p.
AGRITEMPO. Agritempo: Sistema de Monitoramento Agrometeorológico. Disponível em: <http://www.agritempo.gov.br> . Acesso em: fev. 2019.
BOOTSTRAP, T. Twitter bootstrap. 2013. Disponível em: <http://getbootstrap.com>.
BORGES JÚNIOR, João C. F. et al. Métodos de estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência diária para a microrregião de Garanhuns, PE. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, Campina Grande, v. 16, n. 4, p.380-390, jan. 2012.
CANNAROZZO, L.V. Noto, F. Viola. Spatial distribution of rainfall trends in Sicily (1921–2000) Phys. Chem. Earth, 31 (18) (2006), pp. 1201-1211
DEBASTIANI, Carlos Alberto. Definindo Escopo em Projetos de Software. São Paulo: Novatec, 2015. 144 p.
ECLIPSE FOUNDATION. Eclipse Process Framework. Disponível em:<https://www.eclipse.org/>. Acesso em: 03 de Fev. de 2019.
EMBRAPA. Documentos 263 - Evapotranspiração-Uma Revisão sobre os Métodos Empíricos. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária Embrapa Arroz e Feijão Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, 2010.
ERMASTER. What is ERMaster ?. Disponível em: <http://ermaster.sourceforge.net/>. Acesso em: 03 de Fev. de 2019.
FANAYA JÚNIOR, Eder Duarte et al. Métodos empíricos para estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência para Aquidauana, MS. Irriga, Botucatu, Sp, v. 17, n. 4, p.418-434, 02 out. 2012.
FEITOSA, D. G. et al. Artigo técnico software Smai 2.0 para estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência diária e horária 1. [s. l.], [s.d.]. Disponível em: http://clima.feis.unesp.br/smai
FOROUZAN B. A. Comunicação de Dados e Redes de Computadores. 4. ed. São Paulo: McGraw-Hill, 2008.
GONÇALVES, Fabrício Mota et al. Comparação de métodos da estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência para o município de Sobral-CE. Revista Brasileira de Agricultura Irrigada, Fortaleza, Ce, p.1-8, 12 ago. 2009.
GOCIC, Milan; TRAJKOVIC, Slavisa. Software for estimating reference evapotranspiration using limited weather data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, [s. l.], v. 71, n. 2, p. 158–162, 2010.
GUO, D., S. WESTRA, AND H. R. MAIER, An R package for modelling actual, potential and reference evapotranspiration, Environ. Model. Software, 78, 216–224, 2016.
HASAN, S.s.; ISAAC, R.k.. An integrated approach of MAS-CommonKADS, Model–View–Controller and web application optimization strategies for web-based expert system development. Expert Systems With Applications, [s.l.], v. 38, n. 1, p.417-428, jan. 2011. Elsevier BV.
JÚNIOR, A.S.A. Avaliação de métodos para estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência no estado do Piauí. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Agrometeorologia, v. 11, n. 4, 10 ago. 2017.
LARMAN C. Utilizando UML e padrões: uma introdução à análise e ao projeto orientados a objetos e ao desenvolvimento iterativo. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2007.
LEITÃO, M. DE M. V. B. R.; OLIVEIRA, G. M. DE; LEITÃO, T. J. V. Avaliação do desempenho de diferentes métodos de estimativa da evaporação para duas regiões da Paraíba. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 2007.
LIU, Z.F. YANG, B.S. CUI. Spatial and temporal variability of annual precipittion during 1961–2006 in Yellow River Basin China. J. Hydrol., 361, pp. 330-338., 2008.
MAČEK, Urška; BEZAK, Nejc; ŠRAJ, Mojca. Reference evapotranspiration changes in Slovenia, Europe. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, [s. l.], v. 260–261, p. 183–192, 2018.
MCMAHON, T.A., PEEL, M.C., LOWE, L., SRIKANTHAN, R., MCVICAR, T.R.. Estimating actual, potential, reference crop and pan evaporation using standard meteorological data: a pragmatic synthesis. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc. 17 (4), 1331–1363, 2013.
MCVICAR, T.R., KÖRNER, C. On the use of elevation, altitude, and height in the ecological and climatological literature. Oecologia 171 (2), 335–337, 2013.
MENDONÇA, J.C. et al. Comparação entre métodos de estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência (ETo) na região Norte Fluminense, RJ. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, Campina Grande, v.7, n.2, p.275-279, 2003.
MOURA, Ada Ravana Costa et al. Evapotranspiração de referência baseada em métodos empíricos em bacia experimental no Estado de Pernambuco - Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, [s. l.], 2013.
OLIVEIRA, Gertrudes Macario de et al. Comparação entre métodos de estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência na região norte da Bahia. Revista Brasileira de Agricultura Irrigada, Fortaleza, Ce, v. 4, n. 2, p.104-109, 12 jun. 2010.
OPENLAYERS. Basic Concepts. Disponível em: <https://openlayers.org/en/latest/doc/tutorials/concepts.html>. Acesso em: 03 de Fev. de 2019.
PAIVA, C. M. de S.; PINHEIRO, A. da S. Avaliação de métodos de estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência para fins de manejo da irrigação. Anuário do Instituto de Geociências, v. 39, n. 1, p. 42-51, 2016.
PALARETTI, Luiz F.; MANTOVANI, Everardo C.; SEDIYAMA, Gilberto C.. Comparação entre métodos de estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência (ETo) em regiões citrícolas paulistas. Engenharia Agrícola, [s.l.], v. 34, n. 1, p.38-47, fev. 2014. FapUNIFESP (SciELO).
PEREIRA, D. dos R. et al. Desempenho de métodos de estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência para a região da Serra da Mantiqueira, MG. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v. 39, n. 9, p. 2488-2493, dez. 2009.
PILAU et al. Desempenho de métodos de estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência nas localidades de Frederico Westphalen e Palmeira das Missões, RS. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v. 42, n.2, p.283-290, fev. 2012.
PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor. 1995. Disponível em: <http://php.net/>.
PHP: What is PHP ?. Disponível em: <https://secure.php.net/manual/pt_BR/intro-whatis.php>. Acesso em: 03 de Fev. de 2019.
PHP: What can PHP do ?. Disponível em: <https://secure.php.net/manual/pt_BR/intro-whatcando.php>. Acesso em: 03 de Fev. de 2019.
POSTGRESQL. What is PostgreSQL ?. Disponível em: <https://www.postgresql.org/about/>. Acesso em: 03 de Fev. de 2019.
ROSENBERRY, D.O., WINTER, T.C., BUSO, D.C.LIKENS, G.E. 2007, Comparison of 15 evaporation methods applied to a small mountain lake in the northeastern USA, Journal of Hydrology, vol. 340, no. 3, pp. 149-166.
SCHACH S. R. Engenharia de Software: Os Paradigmas Clássico e Orientado a Objetos. 7. ed. São Paulo: McGraw Hill, 2009.
SMARTY TEMPLATE ENGINE. Chapter 1. What is Smaty? Part I. Getting Started. Disponível em: <https://www.smarty.net/docs/en/what.is.smarty.tpl>. Acesso em: 03 de Fev. de 2019.
SOMMERVILLE I. Engenharia de Software. 8. ed. São Paulo: Pearson Addison Wesley, 2007.
SOMMERVILLE I. Engenharia de Software. 9. ed. São Paulo: Pearson Addison Wesley, 2011.
SULEIMAN, A. A.; HOOGENBOOM, G. Comparison of Priestley-Taylor and FAO-56 Penman-Monteith for daily reference evapotranspiration estimation in Georgia. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, v.33, n.2, 175-182. 2007.
TABARI, H., GRISMER, M.E.TRAJKOVIC, S., Comparative analysis of 31 reference evapotranspiration methods under humid conditions, Irrigation Science, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 107-117., 2013.
WANG, H. LIU, L. ZHANG, R. ZHANG. Climate change trend and its effects on reference evapotranspiration at Linhe Station, Hetao Irrigation District Water Sci. Eng., 7 (3) , pp. 250-266., 2014.
YANG, Q. LIU, B. Cui Spatial distribution and temporal variation of reference evapotranspiration during 1961–2006 in the Yellow River Basin
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
