GETTING TO KNOW THE ARTISAN FISHING IN TRAMANDAÍ AND IMBÉ - RS: SPACE DISTRIBUTION AND CHALLENGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X24320Keywords:
Artisanal fishing. Territories. Conflicts.Abstract
The work deals with the theme artisanal fisheries and has as main objective, the characterization of the activity in the municipalities of Tramandaí and Imbé, located in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, the spatial distribution and the challenges to occur fisheries in this region. The research is justified by the large number of fishermen in the study area and the economic importance of the activity, mapping through popular knowledge areas of greatest value for fishing, the main existing species and the main features and instruments used in fish capture.Downloads
References
BRASIL. 2004. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Instrução Normativa MMA nº 17, de 17 de outubro de 2004. p. 6.
BRASIL. 2009. Lei nº 11.959, de 29/06/2009, que “Dispõe sobre a Política Nacional de Desenvolvimento Sustentável da Aquicultura e da Pesca, regula as atividades pesqueiras”.
BRASIL. 2013. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Instrução Normativa MMA nº 07/2013.
BRASIL. Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Contagem Populacional. Disponível em: http://www.cidades.ibge.gov.br/xtras/home.php Censo IBGE 2010. Acesso: 03/03/2014.
COTRIM, D. S.; MIGUEL, L. de A. IN: Eisforia, ano 5, volume 5, número 2. Dezembro 2007, PPG Agroecossistemas/ UFSC, Florianópolis. p. 136 – 160.
DIEGUES, A. C. Pesca e marginalização no litoral paulista. 1973. 187 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - NUPAUB; CEMAR, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 1973.
ESTADO DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL. 2012. Assembleia Legislativa. DECRETO Nº 49.245, DE 18 DE JUNHO DE 2012. (publicado no DOE n.º 117, de 19 de junho de 2012).
IMBÉ. Lei municipal nº1328 de 12 de setembro de 2011. Demarca as áreas de surf e pesca no município de Imbé e dá outras providências.
MACÊDO, S. J.; FLORES MONTES, M. J.; LINS, I. C. Cap. 2. Características abióticas da área. In: BARROS, H. M.; ESKINAZI-
LEÇA, E.; MACÊDO, S. J.; LIMA, T. (Eds). Gerenciamento Participativo de Estuários e manguezais. Ed. Universitária da UFPE, Recife, 2000. p. 7 - 25.
PERUCCHI, L. C.; KUBO, R. R.; COELHO-DE-SOUZA, G. Articulação e encaminhamento das questões da pesca artesanal: Uma análise do Fórum da Pesca do Litoral Norte do Rio Grande do Sul. Revista de Gestão Costeira. Vol. 12. Nº4, 2013. p. 499 – 508.
WALTER, T.; ANELLO, L. de F. S. A EDUCAÇÃO AMBIENTAL ENQUANTO MEDIDA MITIGADORA E COMPENSATÓRIA: Uma reflexão sobre os conceitos intrínsecos na relação com o Licenciamento Ambiental de Petróleo e Gás tendo a pesca artesanal como contexto. Ambiente & Educação, vol. 17(1), 2012. p.73 – 98.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.