Accuracy estimates of land use and land cover classification are associated with the sensitivity of the MAXVER classifier and the holdout subsampling technique on allotments in Pelotas-RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X87230Keywords:
Accuracy, KAPPA statistics, Remote sensing, SIGAbstract
Urban growth in the Pelotas-RS community has intensified in recent years. The number of new subdivisions and housing developments available in the city’s real estate market is a testament to this trend. With this growth, potential problems related to flooding and possible inundation become a cause for concern given the topographical characteristics of the city. One way to monitor this urban expansion is through remote sensing analysis, which provides a wide range of statistical information, including precision and accuracy indices obtained from land use and land cover classification methods. The KAPPA test, for instance, has proven to be very efficient in analyzing areas of impervious surfaces, loss of vegetation cover, etc. These values are important for carrying out urban drainage calculations to determine the dimensioning of rainwater systems. In this case, the study focused on Pelotas. The classification procedure achieved an accuracy of over 90%, which is considered excellent for this type of interpretative analysis.
Downloads
References
Bradter, U. et al. (2020). Classifying grass-dominated habitats from remotely sensed data: The influence of spectral resolution, acquisition time and the vegetation classification system on accuracy and thematic resolution. Science of The Total Environment, 711, 134584, DOI: https: //doi .org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134584.
Chowdhury, M.S., Hafsa, B. (2022). Multi-decadal land cover change analysis over Sundarbans Mangrove Forest of Bangladesh: A GIS and remote sensing based approach. Global Ecology and Conservation. 37, e0215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02151.
Congalton, R. G. (1991). A Review of Assessing the Accuracy of Classifications of Remotely Sensed Data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37, 35-46. DOI https://doi-org.ez66.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B.
IBGE. (2020). Monitoramento da cobertura e uso da terra do Brasil: 2016 - 2018. Coleção IBGEANA. Rio de Janeiro (Brasil): Biblioteca IBGE.
Lee, C., Landgrebe, D. A. (1993). Analyzing High-dimensional Multispectral Data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 31(4), 792-800. DOI: 10.1109/36.239901.
Tucci, C. E. M. (2002). Gerenciamento da Drenagem Urbana. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos, 7.(1), 5-27. DOI10.21168/rbrh.v7n1.p5-27.
Zirbes, E. R. et al. (2022). Análise Temporal dos Índices de Impermeabilização Urbana em Loteamentos no Município de Pelotas - RS. Anais do XXXI Congresso de Iniciação Científica – 8ª SIIEPE, Pelotas, Brasil.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
