XXV ENMC / XIII ECTM / 9º MCSul / IX SEMENGO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X84749Abstract
In 2022, the events XXV National Meeting of Computational Modeling (XXV ENMC) and XIII Meeting of Science and Technology of Materials (XIII ECTM) took place from October 19 to 21, 2022, with all activities of the event carried out in the webinar modality. In this particular year, together with the XXV ENMC and the XIII ECTM, the 9th Southern Conference on Computational Modeling (9th MCSul) and the IX Seminar and Workshop on Ocean Engineering (IX SEMENGO) were held, providing the opportunity to bring together researchers from related areas of knowledge.
The events included lectures from the area of Computational Modeling in Brazil and abroad; its organization was the result of a collaboration between professors from ten public teaching institutions in the country, under the coordination of researchers from universities in Rio Grande do Sul; the event had more than 250 manuscripts submitted and presented in 57 technical sessions, with emphasis on the contributions made by graduate students.
The Organizing Committee selected a sample of original works presented at the event with an interdisciplinary theme. This led to the publication, in December 2023, of this special edition of the XXV ENMC / XIII ECTM / 9º MCSul / IX SEMENGO. We thank the authors who contributed to the high level of this edition.
We wish you all a pleasant reading.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
