Estudo do ciclo diário da Camada Limite Planetária durante a estação chuvosa da Amazônia (GOAmazon 2014/15)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X30650Keywords:
Nocturnal erosion, Turbulent fluxes, Remote sensing 3Abstract
In the present study, the evolution the diurnal cycle of planetary boundary layer in the wet season at Amazon region during a period of intense observations carried out in the GOAmazon Project 2014/2015 (Green Ocean Amazon).The analysis includes radiosonde and remote sensing data. In general case, the results of the daily cycle in the wet season indicate a Nocturnal boundary layer with a small oscillation in its depth and with a tardy erosion. The convective boundary layer did not present great depth, responding to the low values of sensible heat of the wet season. A comparison between the different techniques(in situ observations and remote sensing) for estimating the planetary boundary layer is also presented.Downloads
References
CARNEIRO, R. G.; FISCH, G.; KAUFMANN, T. Determinação da altura da camada limite planetária na floresta amazônica utilizando um ceilometer. Ciência e Natura, v. 38, p. 460–466, 2016.
HUANG, M.; GAO, Z.; MIAO, S.; CHEN, F.; LEMONE M. A.; HU, F. W. L. Estimate of boundary-layer depth over Beijing, china, using doppler lidar data during surf-2015. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, v. 162, p. 503–522, 2017.
MACEDO, A. S.; FISCH, G. Variabilidade temporal da radiação solar durante o experimento GOAmazon 2014/15. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia. 2017. No prelo.
MARTIN, C.; FITZJARRALD, D.; GARSTANG, M.; OLIVEIRA, A.; GRECO, S.; BROWELL, E. Structure and growth of the mixing layer over the Amazonian rain forest. Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 93, n. D2, p. 1361–1375, 1988. ISSN 01480227.
MARTIN, S.T.; ARTAXO, P.; MACHADO, L. A. T.; MANZI, A. O.; SOUZA, R. A. F.; SCHUMACHER, C.; WANG, J.; ANDREAE, M. O.; BARBOSA, H. M. J.; FAN, J.; FISCH, G.; GOLDSTEIN, A. H.; GUENTHER, A.; JIMENEZ, J. L.; POSCHL, U.; SILVA DIAS, M. A.; SMITH, J. N.; WENDISEH, M. Introduction: Observations and Modeling of the Green Ocean Amazon (GoAmazon2014/5). Atmospheric Chemistry Physics. v. 16, p. 4785–4797, 2016.
NEVES, T. T. A. T.; FISCH, G. Camada Limite Noturna sobre área de pastagem na Amazônia. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, v. 26, n. 4, p. 619–628, 2011. ISSN 0102-7786.
NEVES, T. T. A.; FISCH, G. The Daily Cycle of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Heights over Pasture Site in Amazonia. American Journal of Environmental Engineering. v. 5, p. 39 – 44. 2015.
OUWERSLOOT, H. G.; ARELLANO, J. Vila-Guerau de; NOLSCHER, A. C.; KROL, M. C.; GANZEVELD, L. N.; BREITENBERG, C.; MAMMARELLA, I.; WILLIAMS, J.; LELIEVELD, J. Characterization of a boreal convective boundary layer and its impact on atmospheric chemistry during humppa-copec2010. Atmospheric Chemistry Physics, v. 12, p. 9335–9353, 2012.
SANTOS, R. M. N.; FISCH, G.; DOLMAN, A. J.; WATERLOO, M. Modelagem da camada limite noturna (cln) durante a época úmida na amazônia, sob diferentes condições de desenvolvimento. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, v. 22, p. 387–407, 2007.
SHUKLA, K. K.; PHANIKUMAR D. V.AND NEWSOM, R. K.; KUMAR, K. N.; RATNAM, M. V.; NAJA, M.; SINGH, N. Estimation of the mixing layer height over a high altitude site in central himalayan region by using doppler lidar. Journal of Atmosphericand Solar-Terrestrial Physics, v. 109, p. 48–53, 2014.
STULL, R. An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988. 666 p.
WANG, C.; SHI, H.; JIN, L.; CHEN, H.; WEN, H. Measuring boundary-layer height under clear and cloudy conditions using three instruments. Particuology.v. 28, p. 15 – 21. 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
