Algumas contribuições do cultivo natural de Masanobu Fukuoka e da educação libertária à educação ambiental

Authors

  • Diego Sabbado Menezes Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083307

Keywords:

Environmental Education, Libertarian Education, Masanobu Fukuoka

Abstract

The construction of environmental education has enabled a broad debate about the future ofsociety, in view of the current consequences (social, political, environmental in general) thatresulted from old paradigms. The action-research that we propose, resulted of an optimistic viewand a long walk, identifies in the authoritarian relations (and it's various faces and bodies), thefundamental principle of educational models (scientific, social) that reproduce inequality andexploitation. Thus the practice of autonomy and self-management of knowledge, of individualityand collectivity, and the many relationships established, stands as an alternative to radicaltransformation of our reality. In this context of dialogue and action, so we present an introductionand also encourage the multiplication of experiences and exchanges of experiences, somecontributions from the thought of Masanobu Fukuoka, and from the libertarian education for theconstruction of environmental education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

CLASTRES, Pierre. A sociedade contra o Estado – Pesquisas de antropologia política. São Paulo: Cosac Naify, 2003.

DELEUZE, Gilles, GUATTARI, Félix. Mil platôs: Capitalismo e esquizofrenia. Volume 5. São Paulo: Ed. 34, 1997.

FOUCAULT, Michel. Microfísica do poder. 25ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Edições Graal, 2008.

FUKUOKA, Masanobu. A Revolução de uma palha. Tradução: Diego Sabbado Menezes. Versão Inglesa. Original em Japonês. Trabalho não publicado.

_________. La senda natural del cultivo: teoria e practica de uma filosofia verde. Valencia: Terapión, 1991.

_________. The one-straw revolution. Disponível em: http://zinelibrary.info/masanobu-fukuoka-one-strawrevolution-0. Acesso em: 24/03/2011.

GALLO, Silvio. Educação anarquista: um paradigma para hoje. Piracicaba: Ed. Unimep, 1995.

________. Pedagogia do risco: experiência anarquista em educação. Campinas: Papires, 1995.

GUATTARI, Felix. Revolução molecular: pulsações políticas do desejo. 2ª ed. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1985.

________. As Três Ecologias. Campinas, SP: Papirus, 1990.

JOMINI, Regina C. M. Uma educação para a solidariedade: contribuição ao estudo das concepções e realizações educacionais dos anarquistas na República Velha. Campinas, SP: Pontes, 1990.

MORIYÓN, Félix (org.). Educação libertária. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas, 1989.

PETERSEN, Paulo (org.). Agricultura familiar camponesa na construção do futuro. Rio de Janeiro: AS-PTA, 2009.

Downloads

Published

2011-07-11

How to Cite

Menezes, D. S. (2011). Algumas contribuições do cultivo natural de Masanobu Fukuoka e da educação libertária à educação ambiental. Monografias Ambientais, 3(3), 389–395. https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083307

Issue

REMOA, V. 3, N. 3, JUL., 2011

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.