Agroeocology, sustainable farming and mesmis methodology in Central Region of RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130828853Palabras clave:
Sustainability, Agroeocology, Participatory methodologies, MESMISResumen
This work investigates the contribution of family farmers in Agroecological transition, in the Region of the Central Territory of Rio Grande do Sul, for Agroecology and sustainability. It was elaborated from the methodology Marco para la Evaluación de Sistemas de Manejo de Recursos Naturales incorporando Indicadores de Sustentabilidad, or MESMIS, using documents, interviews, photographs and audiovisual materials collected between April 2015 and June 2016, in eight (08) Agroecosystems in agroecological transition. From this group, we question how concepts regarding Agroecology contribute to the maintenance of sustainability. Finally, we present the importance of participatory methodologies and the role of family farmers in the production of sustainable development projects, research and relevant scientific works that value these experiences in the construction and exchange of these knowledge and learning.
Descargas
Citas
ALTIERI, M. Agroecologia: bases científicas para uma agricultura sustentável. ed. Expressão Popular: São Paulo, 2012.
CAPORAL, F. R.; COSTABEBER, J. A. Agroecologia: alguns conceitos e princípios. Brasília: MDA/SAF/DATER-IICA, 2004
CAPORAL, F.R.; COSTABEBER, J. A; G. PAULUS. Agroecologia: matriz disciplinar ou novo paradigma para desenvolvimento rural sustentável. Florianópolis: III Congresso Brasileiro de Agroecologia. 2005.
CHAMBERS, R. Participatory Rural Appraisals: past, present and future. Forests, Trees and People Newsletter.Roma: FAO, n. 15/16, p. 4-9, fev. 1992.
Comissão Mundial sobre Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento. Nosso futuro comum. Rio de Janeiro: Editora da Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 1991.
COSTABEBER, J. A.; Acción Colectiva y Procesos de Transición Agroecológica en Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. 1998. 422f. Tese (Doutorado) - Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos y de Montes, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, 1998.
FREIRE, P. Extensão ou Comunicação?. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1977
GLIESSMAN, S. R. et. al. Agroecología: promoviendo una transición hacia la sostenibilidad. Ecosistemas. Espanha. v. 16, n. 1, p. 13-23. 2007.
GLIESSMAN, S. R.Agroecologia: Processos ecológicos em Agricultura Sustentável. Porto Alegre: UFRGS, 2000.
HABERMAS, J. Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Madrid: Taurus, 1987.
IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo Agropecuário – 2006. Brasil, 2006.
IBGE Cidades. Municípios do Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul: Disponível em: http://cidades.ibge.gov.br/xtras/uf.php?lang=&coduf=43&search=rio-grande-do-sul Acessado em: 11/04/2017.
LEFF, E. Discursos Sustentáveis. São Paulo: Cortez. 2010.
MASERA, O.; ASTIER, M.; LOPEZ-RIDAURA, S. Sustentabilidad y manejo de recursos naturales: el marco de evaluación MESMIS. México: GIRA. 1999.
ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS. Declaração da Conferência das Nações Unidas sobre o Meio Ambiente Humano. Estocolmo. 1972
ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS. Declaração do Rio sobre Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento. Rio de Janeiro. 1992.
PASQUALOTTO, N. Avaliação da Sustentabilidade em Agroecossistemas Hortícolas, com Base de Produção na Agroecologia e na Agricultura Familiar, na Microrregião de Pato Branco – PR. 2013. Dissertação (Mestrado em Desenvolvimento Regional), Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Pato Branco 2013.
SEVILLA GUZMAN, E. A perspectiva sociológica em Agroecologia: uma sistematização de seus métodos e técnicas. Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural Sustentável, Porto Alegre, v.3, n.1, jan/mar, 2002
VERONA, L, A. A real sustentabilidade dos modelos de produção da agricultura Indicadores de sustentabilidade na agricultura.Associação Brasileira de Horticultura, v. 28, n. 2, julho, 2010
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
