Models to the estimative of atmospheric long wave radiation in the cerrado of Mato Grosso
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613089158Keywords:
Index of clarity, Long-wave irradiance, Empirical equations, Statistical indices, Ecosystem modelingAbstract
This study aimed to evaluate and parameterize models to estimating the atmospheric long wave radiation (Ld) in the Cerrado Mato-grossense, considering the sky coverage in terms of clear-sky, partly cloudy and overcast. Taking into account that measurements of Ld are rare, and that this parameter is usually obtained indirectly through various models available in the literature we decided in this study, analyze 107 models for the estimation of Ld. The data used in this study were obtained of equipment installed in a micrometeorological tower 19 meters at Miranda farm in Santo Antônio de Leverger - MT, between the months of june and july, and october and november 2009 totalizing 5856 measures. Estimates of Ld obtained from these formulations, the best performing ones were the ones with the smallest statistical errors and the highest index and coefficients as of determination (R2 ), the Pearson correlation (r), the Wilmott index of “agreement” (1982) (d) and the Camargo & Sentelhas index of “performance” (1997) (c). It can be observed that for conditions clear skies, partly cloudy and overcast, the models to estimate the long-wave irradiance, in its original formulation, which showed the best statistical indices and, therefore, those best adapted for the “Cerrado Mato-grossense” (Brazilian savanna in the Mato Grosso state), in the period studied were, respectively, Ramanadham & Viswanadham (1970), Idso and Jackson (1969) and Bignami et al. (1995) and after parameterization of models: Bárbaro et al. (2010); Aubinet (1994) and Andreas & Ackley (1982).Downloads
References
AGUIAR, L. J. G. Balanço de radiação em áreas de floresta e de pastagem em Rondônia. 2007. 70f,
Dissertação (Mestrado em Meteorologia Agricola) – Universidade de Viçosa, Viçosa, 2007.
BERDAHL, P., MARTIN, M. Emissivity of clear skies. Solar Energy, v. 32, p. 663–664, 1984.
CAMARGO, A. P., SENTELHAS, P. C. Avaliação do desempenho de diferentes métodos de estimativa
da evapotranspiração potencial no estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Agrometeorologia, v.5, n.1, p.89-97, 1997.
BRUTSAERT, W. H. Evaporation Into the Atmosphere: Theory, history, and applications, Kluwer Acad. Norwell, Mass., 1982.
CAMARGO, A. P., SENTELHAS, P. C. Avaliação do desempenho de diferentes métodos de estimativa da evapotranspiração potencial no estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Agrometeorologia, v.5, n.1, p.89-97, 1997.
DALLACORT, R.; FREITAS, P. S. L.; GONÇALVES, A. C. A.; REZENDE, R.; BERTONHA, A. Equações de estimativa da irradiação solar global, compartição mensal, para a região noroeste do Estado do Paraná. In: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE IRRIGAÇÃO E DRENAGEM, 14., 2004, Porto Alegre, RS. 1 CD-ROM. Anais... Porto Alegre: ABID, 2004.
DUAN, Q., SCHAAKE, J., ANDR´EASSIAN, V., FRANKS, S., GOTETI, G., GUPTA, H. V., GUSEV, Y. M., HABETS, F., HALL, A., HAY, L., HOGUE, T., HUANG, M., LEAVESLEY, G., LIANG, X., NASONOVA, O. N., NOILHAN, J., OUDIN, L., SOROOSHIAN, S., WAGENER, T., WOOD, E. E. F. Model parameter estimation experiment (mopex): An overview of science strategy and major results from the second and third workshops, Journal of Hydrology, v. 320, p. 3–17.
EMBRAPA. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. Brasília: Embrapa, p. 412, 1999.
FEITOSA, J. R. P., FERREIRA DA COSTA, R., FISCH, G.; SOUZA, S. S., NOBRE, C. A. Radiação
solar global em áreas de floresta e pastagem na Amazônia. Aceito para publicação na Revista Brasileira de Agrometeorologia, 1998.
FOX, D. G. Judging air quality model performance, Bulletin of American Meteorological Society, v. 62,
p. 599–609, 1980.
INMET, Observações meteorológicas, Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia, Cuiabá, INMET 1999.
LEGATES, D. R., MCCABE JR, E. G. J. Evaluating the use of ”goodness-offit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation, Water Resources Research, v. 35 (1), p. 233–241. 1999.
MANTOVANI, J.E., PEREIRA, A. Estimativa da integridade da cobertura vegetal do Cerrado através de dados TM/Landsat. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE SENSORIAMENTO REMOTO, Santos, SP. 9, 11-18/setembro/1998.
MANZI, A. O., VISWANADAM, Y., SÁ, L. D. A., ANDRÉ, R. G. B. Um estudo sobre o balanço de radiação da floresta Amazônica. São José dos Campos: INPE, 1986. (INPE-3956-PRE/974). OKE, T. R. Boundary Layer Climates. London: Routledge, 1987. 435p.
STEWART, J. B.; THOM, A. S. Energy budgets in pine forest. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, v. 99, n. 419, p. 154-170, 1973.
TANG, Y.; REED, P.; WAGENER, E. T. How effective and efficient are multiobjective evolutionary algorithms at hydrologic model calibration?, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, v. 10, p. 289–307. 2006.
WILLMOTT C.J. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, v. 63, p. 1309-1313, 1982.
WILLMOTT, C. J.; ACKLESON, S. G.; DAVIS, R. E.; FEDDEMA, H. J.; KLINK, K. M.; LEGATES, D.; O’DONNELL, R. J.; ROWE, E. C. M. Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 90 (C5), p. 8995–9005. 1985.
YAPO, P. O.; GUPTA, H. V.; SOROOSHIAN, E S. Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models. Journal of Hydrology, v. 204, p. 83–97. 1998.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
