Diagnóstico ambiental: uma pesquisa exploratória na região fronteira oeste do Rio Grande do Sul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613087594Keywords:
Environmental Consulting, Environmental Management, EnvironmentalAbstract
In the area of environmental management, the environmental consulting and advisory services stand out as promising segments. The demand for this line of work has grown due to the Brazilian Environmental Legislation to have one of the most elaborate in the world and the rigorous control by environmental agencies, for companies to comply with the requirements of the law. The studies found that it is still a small number of companies looking for consulting or advisory services in the municipal studied. There was greater planning in relation to environmental issues, and many organizations consider the issues in their budgets and the service sector is one that seeks to identify further opportunities to reduce costs facing the environment. Still, as the performance of the environmental manager noted that there is a resistance to the incorporation of actions which minimize the impacts of its projects on the environment and the lack of information on environmental management systems and the performance of professionals.
Downloads
References
ALMEIDA, F. Os Desafios da Sustentabilidade uma ruptura urgente. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier Campus, 2007.
BRASIL, LEI Nº 6.938, de 31 de Agosto de 1981. Dispõe sobre a Política Nacional do Meio Ambiente, seus fins e mecanismos de formulação e aplicação e dá outras providências.
BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente (CONAMA). Resolução Nº001/86, de 23 de Janeiro de 1986. Considera-se impacto ambiental qualquer alteração das propriedades físicas, químicas e biológicas do meio ambiente, causada por qualquer forma de matéria ou energia resultante das atividades humanas.
BRASIL PROFISSÕES. Gestor ambiental. Disponível em: http://www.brasilprofissoes.com.br/profissoes/gestorambiental. Acesso em: 10 de Setembro de 2012.
CROCCO, L., GUTTMANN, E. Consultoria Empresarial. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2005. Declaração do Rio sobre Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento. Disponível em:
http://www.mma.gov.br/port/sdi/ea/documentos/convs/decl_rio92.pdf. Acessado em 02 de Setembro de 2012.
DIAS, R. Gestão Ambiental: Responsabilidade Social e Sustentabilidade. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.
DONAIRE, Denis. Gestão Ambiental na Empresa. 2. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.
FARIAS, L.G.Q, GÓES, A.O.S. JÚNIOR, A.C.S. Gestão ambiental e tecnologias ambientais: Práticas e benefícios em uma indústria alimentícia no Sul da Bahia. RGSA – Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental. V.4, Nº.1, p. 80-911, 2010.
GIL, Antônio Carlos. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. São Paulo, 5ª edição, 2010. Editora Atlas.
LA ROVERE, E. L.; D'AVIGNON, A.; PIERRE, C. V.; KLIGERMAN, D. C.; SILVA, H. V. O.; BARATA, M. M. L.; MALHEIROS, T. M. M. Manual de auditoria ambiental. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Qualitymark, 2001.
LEFF, E. Saber Ambiental- Sustentabilidade, Racionalidade, Complexidade, Poder. Petróplis-RJ: Vozes/ PNUMA, 2001, 343 p.
MARCONI,M.A., LAKATOS, E.M. Fundamentos de metodologia cientifica. 7. Ed., São Paulo: Atlas, 2010.
MOURA, L. A. A. Qualidade e Gestão Ambiental. 5. ed. São Paulo: Juarez de Oliveira, 2008.
OLIVEIRA, D. P. R. Manual de Consultoria Empresarial: conceitos, metodologia, práticas. 8. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.
PHILIPPI JR., A., ROMÉRO, M. A., BRUNA, G. C. Uma Introdução à Gestão Ambiental. In: PHILIPPI JR., A., ROMÉRO, M. A., BRUNA, G. C. Curso de Gestão Ambiental. Barueri, SP: Manole, 2004.
TEIXEIRA, M. G. C.; BESSA, E. S. Estratégias para Compatibilizar Desenvolvimento Econômico e Gestão Ambiental
numa Atividade Produtiva Local. RAC, v. 13, edição especial, p. 1-18, 2009. Disponível em: http://www.anpad.org.br/rac
VALLE, C. E. Qualidade Ambiental: ISO 14000. 8. ed. São Paulo: Senac, 2002. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Disponível em: http://www.wbcsd.org/templates/TemplateWBCSD5/layout.asp?MenuID=1. Acesso em: 5 de Setembro de 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
