Percepção ambiental de docentes em escola rural no estado de Sergipe

Authors

  • Cristiano Cunga Costa Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Itabaiana, SE
  • Paulo Sergio Maroti Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Itabaiana, SE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/223613087485

Keywords:

Mind maps, Landmarks, Water resource

Abstract

The environmental issue becomes even more present every day in the face of human pressure on environmental resources. Thus, it becomes necessary to study the environmental perception, as a tool for environmental education, encouraging a discussion about environmental issues in an interdisciplinary manner. For this, we delivered 2 sheets of white paper, and requested the design of the current status of the dam and the dam would be like 10 years from now. Then, in the back of the sheet, give us feedback about the designs. Were observed, as the current situation, mind maps with landmarks associated with irrigation, domestic, tourist activities developed in the dam in bars and transport facilities, with the presence of animals without riparian vegetation, water and dark colored without infrastructure structure to meet the demand for visitation. Regarding the situation of the dam in ten years, we observed landmarks typically an environment in harmony with humans. There is a fresh water, fish, riparian vegetation and human figure united in favor of the environment. Moreover, note landmarks with profiles pessimistic, due to overuse of natural resources, the neglect and lack of awareness of the people, as possible causes of the unbalanced environment. So clearly the concern with the dam under study, both with their current situation as well as future situation, highlighting the need to adopt strategies for recovery and preservation of water resources.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cristiano Cunga Costa, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Itabaiana, SE

Engenheiro Florestal (UFS), Especialista em Educação Ambiental e Recursos Hídricos (USP), Mestre em Agroecossistemas (UFS)

Paulo Sergio Maroti, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Itabaiana, SE

Prof. Adjunto, UFS

References

BARRAZA, L. Children’s Drawings About the Environment. Environmental Education Research. Vol 5 nº. 1, p 49-66, 1999.

FAGGIONATO, Sandra. Texto situado no site: http://educar.sc.usp.br/biologia/textos/m_a_txt4.html, 2005. Acesso em: 25/03/07.

FERRARA, L. D. A. Olhar periférico: Informação Linguagem, Percepção Ambiental. São Paulo: EDUSP, 1993.

GUARIM, V. L. M. S. Barranco Alto: uma experiência em educação Ambiental. Cuiabá, UFMT, 2002.

GUIMARÃES, S. T. L. Percepção, interpretação e valoração ambiental. Departamento de geografia IGCE-UNESP, Rio Claro, 2007. (Notas de Aula – Disciplina Percepção e Interpretação Ambiental da Profª. Solange Guimarães proferida no curso do CRHEA – Centro de Recursos Hídricos e Ecologia Aplicada).

HIGUCHI, M. I. G.; AZEVEDO, G. C. Educação como processo na construção da cidadania ambiental. Revista Brasileira de Educação Ambiental, Brasília, nº. 0, 2004, p.63-70.

IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, 2010. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/geociencias/cartografia/manual_nocoes/elementos_representacao.html. Acesso em: 10/05/10.

JACOBI, C. M.; FLEURY, L. C.; ROCHA, A. C. C. L. Percepção ambiental em unidades de conservação: experiência com diferentes grupos etários no Parque Estadual da Serra do Rola Moça, MG. Anais do 7º Encontro de Extensão da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2004.

KRASILCHIK, M. Educação ambiental na escola brasileira – passado, presente e futuro. Revista Ciência e Cultura, Rio de Janeiro, nº. 38, 1986, p.1958-1961.

MAROTI, P. S. Educação e Interpretação Ambiental junto à comunidade do entorno de uma unidade de conservação. Tese de Doutorado. São Carlos: PPG-ERN - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, 2002.

MARTINS, A. K. S. As contribuições do estudo do meio para a inserção da educação ambiental no contexto escolar. Trabalho de Monografia. Disciplina Pesquisa e Ensino de Ciências e Biologia, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, 2007.

NIEMEYER, A. M. de. Desenhos e mapas na orientação espacial: pesquisa e ensino de antropologia. IFCH/Unicamp, n. 12,1994.

NIDELCOFF, M. T. A escola e a compreensão da realidade. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1979.

PONTUSCHKA, N. N. A formação pedagógica do professor de geografia e as práticas interdisciplinares. 1994. 343f. Tese (Doutorado em Educação) - Faculdade de Educação, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 1994.

Downloads

Published

2013-04-07

How to Cite

Costa, C. C., & Maroti, P. S. (2013). Percepção ambiental de docentes em escola rural no estado de Sergipe. Monografias Ambientais, 11(11), 2379–2388. https://doi.org/10.5902/223613087485

Issue

REMOA, V. 11, N. 11, JAN.-ABR., 2013

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.