Contradições do monoteísmo judaico-cristão e da razão com a natureza: questões essenciais para se pensar um novo estar do homem no planeta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613087463Keywords:
Environmental Management, Environmental Crisis, Judeo-Christian Monotheism, Reason, NatureAbstract
The aim of this study was to verify the contradiction that the Judeo-Christian monotheism and the reason establishes with nature, which can be reflected directly in the actions of man on this. It is a literature review which used dialectic historical materialism as methodology of analysis and adopted as basic or simple category, stage of the discussions, the dialectical relationship that Christianity and reason establish with nature. It was found, by reading the texts chosen, that the Judeo-Christian monotheism and the exacerbation reason as the only valid way to meet are the direct responsible for generating a conception of the world in men in which they see as something external or outside nature, what makes room for that nature is completely dessacralizada and taken as object to the actions of men. From this central question has made some comments on another sense of religiosity – to invite the man to re-bind the nature-and the limits of reason to explain reality.
Downloads
References
ADORNO, TW; HORKHAIMER, M. O conceito de iluminismo. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1999. (Coleção Os Pensadores).
ATLAN, H. Teórico da auto-organização. In: PSTERNAK-PESSIS, G. (Org). Do caos à inteligência artificial. São Paulo: UNESP, 1993.
CAMPOS, Marília de Freitas. Educação ambiental e paradigmas de interpretação da realidade: tendências reveladas. [tese de doutorado] Campinas, 2000. 389p.
CAPRA, Fritjof. O ponto de mutação: a ciência, a sociedade e a cultura emergente. 25ed. São Paulo: Cultrix, 1999.
CAPRA, Fritjof. O tao da física. São Paulo: Cultrix, 2001.
CAPRA, Fritjof. A teia da vida. 14 ed. São Paulo: Pensamento-Cultrix, 2007.
CHADDAD, Flávio Roberto. Formação Continuada: desenvolvimento de um projeto de educação ambiental - 2004. Dissertação de Mestrado. Faculdade de Educação, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-Campinas), 2004.
CHADDAD, Flávio Roberto; CHADDAD, Marcela Cristina; GHILARDI, Renato Pirani. Problemas e questionamentos a educação ambiental crítica. 1 ed. Pará de Minas: Virtual Books, 2011.
CIORAN, Emil Michel. Nos cumes do desespero. São Paulo: Hedra, 2012.
DELEUZE, Gilles. Espinosa: filosofia prática. São Paulo: Escuta, 2002.
FIGUEIREDO, V. Kant e a crítica da razão pura. Rio de Janeiro: ZAHAR, 2010.
FREUD, Sigmund. Cinco lições de psicanálise. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1978.
GUATTARI, Félix. As três ecologias. Campinas: Papirus, 2001.
LÖWY, Michael. As aventuras de Karl Marx contra o Barão de muchhausen. São Paulo: Cortez, 2003.
MALAGODI, E. O que é materialismo dialético. 2ed. São Paulo: Editora Brasiliense, 1988.
MARTINS, GA. Manual para elaboração de monografias e dissertações. São Paulo: Atlas, 1994.
MARX, Karl. Pensamento vivo. Martin Claret: São Paulo, 1990.
MARX, Karl. Para a crítica da economia política. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, s/d.
NIETZSCHE, F. O anticristo. Rio de Janeiro: Editor Newton Compton Brasil, 1996.
NIETZSCHE, F. A origem da tragédia. São Paulo: Editora Moraes, s/d.
NIETZSCHE, F. A gaia da ciência. São Paulo: Martin Claret, 2005.
OLIVEIRA, M. G. B; NOVICKI, V. Educação ambiental no programa de despoluição da baia de Guanabara. Anped Sudeste. Rio de Janeiro: 02 a 06/05/2004. (CD-ROM).
PLATÃO. A república. São Paulo: Martin Claret, 2001.
REIGOTA, Marcos. O que educação ambiental. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 2001. (Coleção primeiros passos)
RUSSEL, Bertrand. História do pensamento ocidental. Rio de Janeiro: Ediouro, 2001.
SILVA, JF. Panteísmo e solipsismo no tractatus de Wittgenstein. SABERES, Natal-RN, V.2, n.2, maio 2009.
SCHOPENHAUER, A. Da morte e sua relação com a indestrutibilidade do nosso ser-em-si. São Paulo: Martin Claret, 2004.
SORRENTINO, M; TRAJBER, R; MENDONÇA, P; FERRARO JUNIOR, L.A. Educação ambiental como política pública. Educ. Pesqui, v.31, n.2, p.285-299, maio/ago. 2005.
TOZONI-REIS, MFC. Educação ambiental: natureza, razão e história. Campinas: Autores Associados, 2004.
UNIVERSIDADE DE FRANCA (UNIFRAN). Material de Estudos. Módulo I: Antropologia Cultural. NEAD – Universidade de
Franca: Franca (SP), 2012. (Circulação Interna).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
