Atributos bioclimáticos urbanos uma análise sobre o ponto de vista qualitativo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613087175Keywords:
Urban Sustainability, Environmental Comfort, BioclimatologyAbstract
Recent discussions indicate sustainability as a compulsory measure for the technical and scientificdevelopment. Cities follow a pattern of organization that involves growth and economic interests,political and social, so the urban area has a number of training patterns. The capital of MatoGrosso, Cuiabá is a city in the early eighteenth century, their initial training was from the centralregion crossed by the stream of Prainha and Porto region the banks of the River Cuiabá. The portdistrict has land use and soil mix consisting of residences, businesses, service providers andinstitutions. The characteristics of occupation can define the neighborhood has sparsely built,noting a large amount of green area preserved. The objective of this study is to analyze throughbioclimatic form at various points located in different regions of the Port district, the methodologywas adopted, Romero (2001), the same set of bioclimatic comes along with the formal elements ofthe building and space urban, with an emphasis on the space for public use. In the overall analysiswe are able to verify the geometric pattern, urban as well as suggesting what the best option fordirecting the development of a more sustainable city.
Downloads
References
DUARTE, D. H. S. (2000) Padrões de ocupação do solo e microclimas urbanos na região de clima tropical continental. Tese (Doutorado em Arquitetura). Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo.
GIVONI, B. (1991) Impact of planted areas on urban environmental quality: a review. Atmospheric Environment, Oxford, v.25B, n.3, p.289-199.
GIVONI, B. (1994) Passive and Low Energy Cooling of Buildings. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
ROMERO, M. A. Arquitetura Bioclimática do Espaço Público. 1.ed. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília, 2001.
ROBITU M., MUSY M., INARD C.,GROLEAU D. (2006) Modeling the influence of vegetation and water pond on urban microclimate. Solar Energy v80.
SANTAMOURIS M., GAITANI N., SPANOU A., SALIARI M., GIANNOPOULOU K.,VASILAKOPOULOU K., KARDOMATEAS T. (2012) Using cool paving materials to improve microclimate of urban areas e Designrealization and results of the flU. Us project. Building and Environment v53.
SHASHUA-BAR L.,TSIROS I. X., HOFFMAN M. E. (2010) A modeling study for evaluating passive cooling scenarios in urban streets with trees. Case study: Athens, Greece. Building and Environment v45.
SIQUEIRA E. M.; ALENCASTRO A.; CONTE C. Q.; LACERDA L. B., Cuiabá: de vila a metrópole nascente. Textos vários autores. 2° Ed. Cuiabá: Editora Entrelinhas, 2007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
