Impactos financeiros dos gastos das medidas de gestão ambiental em uma unidade de abastecimento de posto de combustível
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613085900Keywords:
Environmental Accounting, Environmental expenditures, Trade in fuelsAbstract
The environment is an indispensable resource for human survival, as well as certain economicactivities are essential, and difficult to reconcile a peaceful coexistence between the two. It is ofgrowing concern in proposing an economic development covering issues related to theenvironment, to promote basic environmental conditions, not attacking the nature and placewhere such ventures are installed. Accordingly, the gas stations because they are characterized bythe development of high-risk activities for the environment, should invest in environmentalprotection in order to make their activity less aggressive as possible. Any measure adoptedenvironmental management in order to preserve the environment involves the consumption ofresources, which need to be controlled and properly accounted for. Therefore, it is the duty ofaccounting to identify and assess the economic and financial events related to the can affect the outcome of state assets and entities. This study sought to identify theenvironmental management measures implemented by the Cooperative of Autonomous RoadVehicles Drivers of Santa Maria, and analyzing costs associated with environmental managementactions. Technique was employed for observation combined with the structured interviewtechnique. The results revealed that the environmental costs had a negative representative for thecompany, in other words, instead of contributing to the maintenance and growth of the company,represented an economic sacrifice, as it is not diluted in the volume of revenues during the year.
Downloads
References
BEUREN, Ilse Maria et al. Como elaborar trabalhos monográficos em contabilidade: teoria e prática. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2006.
CERVO, Amado Luiz; BERVIAN, Pedro Alcino. Metodologia científica. 5. ed. São Paulo: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2002.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DO MEIO AMBIENTE (CONAMA). Resoluções: resolução n° 001 de 23 de janeiro de 1986. [s.l.]: CONAMA, 1986. Disponível em: http://www.ecologia.dbi.ufla.br/site%20ecoaplicada/legisla%C3%A7%C3%A3o/Resolu%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20CONAMA%20N%C2%BA%2001-1986.htm. Acesso em: 1 nov. 2010.
______. Resoluções: resolução n° 237 de 19 de dezembro de 1997. [s.l.]: CONAMA, 1997. Disponível em: http://www.mma.gov.br/port/conama/res/res97/res23797.html. Acesso em: 20 out. 2010.
______. Resoluções: resolução n° 273 de 29 de novembro de 2000. [s.l.]: CONAMA, 2000. Disponível em: http://www.mma.gov.br/port/conama/res/res00/res27300.html. Acesso em: 20 out. 2010.
GIL, Antônio Carlos. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2007.
LORENZETT, Daniel Benitti; ROSSATO, Marivane Vestena; NEUHAUS, Mauricio. A gestão ambiental em postos de combustíveis. In: SIMPOSIO DE ENSINO PESQUISA E EXTENSÃO,10 a 12 de Nov. 2010, Santa Maria/RS. Anais eletrônicos... Santa Maria: SEPE, 2010. Disponível em: http://www.unifra.br/eventos/sepe2010/2010/Trabalhos/sociais_Aplicadas/Completo/4642.pdf. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2010.
MARCONI, Maria de Andrade; LAKATOS, Eva Maria. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 2. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2005.
TINOCO, João Eduardo Prudêncio; KRAEMER, Maria Elisabeth Pereira. Contabilidade e gestão ambiental. São Paulo: Atlas, 2004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
