Stream of water pollution of highway and domestic sources in Cravinhos, SP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613085564Keywords:
Environmental impacts, Contamination, Water resources, Shared responsibilityAbstract
This article deals with the procedure employed by the author in evaluating a case of it contaminationof water resources in Cravinhos (SP), under judicial discussion by the parties. The method usedconsisted of a literature review and analysis of documentation of legal proceedings. The aim ofthis work is to support those interested in understanding the environmental impacts that can betransformed into legal disputes. The results of the case study can be derived that the sources ofpollution have shared responsibility for environmental impacts and solutions.
Downloads
References
ALVES, F. A. O; COSTA, A. R. Estimativa de volume para reservatório de detenção no controle de cheias urbanas. I Simpósio de Recursos Hídricos do Norte e Centro-Oeste. Cuiabá (MT), 2007.
ANDRADE, M. M. Introdução à metodologia do trabalho científico. São Paulo: Atlas, 2001.
ARAUJO, P. R.; TUCCI, C. E. M.; GOLDENFUN, J. A. Avaliação da eficiência dos pavimentos permeáveis na redução de escoamento superficial. Instituto de Pesquisas Hidráulicas da UFRGS – Porto Alegre (RS). Disponível em: <http://galileu.iph.ufrgs.br>. Acesso em: 13 nov. 2011.
BRASIL (UNIÃO) Casa Civil. Decreto nº 5.472/2005. Promulga texto da Convenção de Estocolmo sobre poluentes orgânicos persistentes. Brasília, 2005.
_______ Lei nº 11.445/2007. Diretrizes nacionais para o saneamento básico. Brasília, 2007.
_______ Decreto nº 7.217/2010. Regulamento da política nacional de saneamento básico. Brasília, 2010.
_______ Lei Federal nº 12.305/2010. Política nacional de resíduos sólidos – PNRS. Brasília: 2010a.
CONAMA - Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Resolução CONAMA nº 1/1986. Estudo de impacto ambiental. Brasília, 1986.
_______ Resolução CONAMA nº 357/2005. Classificação de corpos d’água, condições e padrões para lançamento de efluentes. Brasília, 2005.
BULA. Antrazina Atanor 50 SC. Disponível em: http://www.agroimport.com.br. Acesso em: 7 fev. 2011.
CRAVINHOS (MUNICÍPIO). Secretaria Municipal de Obras. Cópia de plantas da galeria de águas pluviais do Jardim Alvorada, do requerimento e da autorização de travessia de tubulação para escoamento de água em faixa de domínio do DER. Cravinhos, 2011.
LSC - LABORATÓRIO SÃO CAMILO. Heptacloro e heptacloro epóxido. Disponível em: http://saocamilolab.com.br/exames. Acesso em: 7 fev. 2011.
MAINIER, F. B.; VIOLA, E. D. M. O sulfeto de hidrogênio (H2S) e o meio ambiente. Disponível em: http://www.aedb.br/seget/artigos05/261_H2S.pdf. Acesso em: 7 fev. 2011.
MINAS GERAIS (ESTADO). Secretaria de Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Orientações básicas para a drenagem urbana. Belo Horizonte, FEAM, 2006.
PARKINSON, J.; MILOGRANA, J.; CAMPOS, L. C.; CAMPOS, R. Drenagem Urbana Sustentável no Brasil. In: Workshop sobre drenagem urbana em Goiânia. Universidade Federal de Goiás. 7 de maio de 2003. Goiânia: UFG, 2003.
SÃO PAULO (ESTADO) Ministério Público. Promotoria de Justiça de Cravinhos. Inquérito Civil nº 14/2003. Cravinhos, 2003.
SEADE – Fundação Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados. Perfil municipal. Disponível em: http://www.seade.gov.br. Acesso em 13 nov. 2011.
TOMAZ, P. Caixa de retenção de óleo e sedimentos. São Paulo, 2005.
WIKIPÉDIA. Cravinhos. Disponível em: http://pt.wikipedia.org. Acesso em: 13 nov. 2011.
VERGARA, S. C. Projetos e Relatórios de Pesquisa em Administração. São Paulo: Atlas, 1997.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
