Educação ambiental como ferramenta de ação na recuperação de área degradada em Bonsucesso – Guarulhos

Authors

  • Vanterli Gomes Fialho Universidade Guarulhos, Guarulhos, SP
  • Eliane de Siqueira Zanzini Universidade Guarulhos, Guarulhos, SP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084992

Keywords:

Degradação, Reabilitação, Recuperação, Conscientização, Cidadania

Abstract

Throughout human history man has drained wetlands, cut down forests, diverted rivers, builthouses, villages, towns, neighborhoods, cities, ..., dig for minerals, causing major impacts onwildlife. This work aims to restore degraded land, located between the Highway and Road CapuavaLavras - Guarulhos. Will be proposed the recovery of degraded areas, working with the dataobtained through the photographic survey and field, working in two main variables: physicalrecovery of degraded areas and environmental education through actions performed in anenvironmental education center. With such interference carried expect to recompose the area, andover 20 years, the results can be harvested by all, so we will be promoting the integration of manand the environment, and ensuring their balanced use for future generations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vanterli Gomes Fialho, Universidade Guarulhos, Guarulhos, SP

Formado em Tecnologia de Gestão Ambiental em 2010 e Formando em Educação Ambiental em 2011

References

BRANCO, Samuel Murgel. O meio ambiente em debate. 3. ed. São Paulo: Moderna, 2006

DA SILVA, Eva de Fátima Grêlo. Análise da implementação dos planos de recuperação de áreas degradadas pela mineração em Lourenço (AP) . Dissertação de Mestrado. PLADES / NAEA / UFPA. Belém, 2005.

DESCARTES. Discurso do método. (Coleção Os Pensadores). São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1999.

FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da Autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1996.

GIANSANTI, Roberto. O Desafio do Desenvolvimento Sustentável. 6. ed. São Paulo, 1998.

GOMES, Alessandro. Legislação Ambiental e Direito: um olhar sobre o Artigo 225 da Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Revista Científica Eletrônica de Administração – Garça/S.Paulo. Ano VIII – Número 14 – Junho de 2008. Periódicos Semestral.

NOFFS, Paulo da Silva, GALLI, Luiz Fernando e GONÇALVES, Jânio Carlos. Recuperação de Áreas Degradadas da Mata Atlântica. Uma experiência da CESP – Companhia Energética da São Paulo. Caderno nº 3 – Série Recuperação. Conselho Nacional da Reserva da Biosfera da Mata Atlântica, 2000.

OLIVEIRA, Elton Soares de., FERNANDES, Maria Claudia Vieira., CARVALHO, Gláucia Garcia de., OMAR, Elmi El Hage., PRÉZIA, Benedito Antonio Genofre., SATO, Sandra Emi., et al. Guarulhos: espaço de muitos povos. - 2ª ed. - São Paulo: Noovha América, 2008. - (Série conto, canto e encanto com a minha história...). Disponível em: www.guarulhos.sp.gov.br. Acesso em: 28 junho 2010.

Downloads

Published

2012-06-11

How to Cite

Fialho, V. G., & Zanzini, E. de S. (2012). Educação ambiental como ferramenta de ação na recuperação de área degradada em Bonsucesso – Guarulhos. Monografias Ambientais, 7(7), 1591–1600. https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084992

Issue

REMOA, V. 7, N. 7, MAR.-JUN., 2012

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.