Educação ambiental em uma escola de ensino médio como ferramenta para conhecimento do passivo ambiental
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084968Keywords:
Environmental liabilities, Research project, Mathematic, Environment educationAbstract
This article is referring to a monograph titled ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION IN A HIGHSCHOOL AS A TOOL FOR KNOWLEDGE OF ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES, environmental educationcourse at the Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, presented on December 16, 2011. ThisEnvironmental Education monograph worked at two distinct times: at first it was tried thetechnical knowledge about environmental liabilities, and by searching unstructured situation ofthe Municipality on this issue. In the second phase sought to show how to implement anenvironmental education into the teaching of mathematics. To this, we dealt with a proposal of the National Curriculum Parameters (PCN's) and the National Policy on Environmental Education(Law No. 9795 of April 27, 1999, Brazil) to use environmental issues across the board withMathematics, by a research project conducted by students from high school in a state school,addressing the subject of production, or not, of an environmental liability in industry, health andgovernance of the municipality. We intend to establish a link between the functions and algebra ofElementary Mathematics in an attempt to show the way for environmental education. With surveydata on the environmental liabilities, were constructed graphs; tables and percentagerelationships for a quantitative analysis and visualization of the behavior of the rate of productionof waste and resources to solve this problem. Mathematics contextualizing with the environmentis not only a way of stimulating classes, making them more interconnected and related to the localand global environmental context, but also as a way to study the environmental and ecologicalproblems raising awareness for students use natural resources, this way building a model ofeducation focus on social and environmental citizenship.Downloads
References
ARMANI, Domingos. Como Elaborar Projetos? Guia Prático para a Elaboração e Gestão de Projetos Sociais. Porto Alegre: Tomo Editorial, 2000.
DIAS, Genebaldo Freire. Educação Ambiental: Princípios e práticas. 9ª ed. São Paulo – Gaia, 2004.
DEMO, Pedro. Avaliação e democracia. Artigo encartado na revista ABC Educatio - ano 7, n° 56, maio de 2006.
FAMURS. Gestão Pública Municipal. Orientações nas ações municipais no meio ambiente. Planejamento integrado, estratégico e sustentado. Coletânea básica de legislação ambiental. RGS, 2005.
FREIRE, Paulo. Política e Educação: ensaios / Paulo Freire. – 5. ed. – São Paulo, Cortez, 2001. (Coleção Questões da nossa época; v.23).
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da autonomia: Saberes necessários à prática educativa / Paulo Freire. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1996 (Coleção leitura).
LUTZENBERGER, José: Manual de ecologia: do jardim ao poder: Vol. I, Porto Alegre: L&PM, 2004. PARÂMETROS CURRICULARES DO ENSISNO MÉDIO. Ensino Médio. 2000. Disponível em: http://portal.mec.gov.br/seb/arquivos/pdf/blegais.pdf. Acesso em 22 Mar. 2011.
PRESIDÊNCIA DA REPÚBLICA. Casa Civil. Subchefia para Assuntos Jurídicos. Lei n° 12.305, de 2 agosto de 2010. Disponível em: http://www.mma.gov.br/port/conama/legiabre.cfm?codlegi=636. Acesso em 22 Ago.2010.
PRESIDÊNCIA DA REPÚBLICA. Casa Civil. Subchefia para Assuntos Jurídicos. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constitui%C3%A7ao.htm. Acesso em 22 Set. 2010.
RIO GRANDE DO SUL. Assembléia Legislativa do Estado. Código Estadual da Meio Ambiente. Comissão de Saúde e Meio Ambiente. Grupo de Trabalho. Agosto, 2000.
SANTOS, A. R. dos. Metodologia Científica: a construção do conhecimento. Rio de Janeiro: DP&A, 1999.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.