A conscientização para educação e planejamento de soltura de aves silvestres aplicados à população do bairro do Jardim Cumbica, município de Guarulhos-SP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084624Abstract
The present work aims to raise awareness and sensitize the population of the GardenDistrict Jardim Cumbica, Guarulhos city-SP regarding the dangers of trafficking of wild birds, toshow the impacts that may be caused in the ecosystem, possible diseases, and the negativeimpact on the issue environmental partner, the result of practice in the creation of wild birds,presenting the main Brazilian birds, trafficked in Brazil end other countries, pointing also theamount of dirty money generated by this traffic, where it ends by encouraging and stimulatingother illegal practices such as trafficking drugs end weapons, where we expect to actually realize aportion of the population of all possible crimes caused the trafficking of wild birds.
Downloads
References
FRISCH, JD Aves Brasileiras 1989 São Paulo, Dalgas Ecoltec Ecologia Técnica 351p.
DUNNING J.S South American Birds 1989.
SICK, H Birds in Brasil 1993.
GRANTSAU, R. Os Beija-flores 1988.
SICK, H . Ornitologia Brasileira. 1997 Rio de Janeiro, Ed Fronteira. 912p. Meio Ambiente Agora 2011. Disponível em: http://meioambienteagora.com.br. Acesso em: 4 de Agosto de 2011.
Natureba vegetarismo 2011. Disponível em: http://www.natureba.com.br/trafico-animais-silvestres.htm. Acesso em: 3 de Agosto de 2011.
O que é um animal silvestre 2011 disponível em: http://www.wwf.org.br/informacoes/questoes_ambientais/animais_silvestres/. Acesso em: 3 de Agosto de 2011. http://www.ibama.gov.br/fauna-silvestre/wp-content/files. Acesso em: 9 de Agosto de 2011
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
