A conscientização para educação e planejamento de soltura de aves silvestres aplicados à população do bairro do Jardim Cumbica, município de Guarulhos-SP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084624Resumen
O presente trabalho visa conscientizar e sensibilizar a população do Bairro do Jardim Cumbica, município de Guarulhos - SP referente aos malefícios do tráfico de aves silvestres, mostrar os impactos que podem ser causados no eco sistema, as possíveis doenças, e os reflexos negativos na questão sócio ambiental, na consequência da pratica na criação das aves silvestres, apresentar as principais aves Brasileira, traficadas no Brasil e para outros países do mundo, apontar também a quantia de dinheiro sujo gerado com esse tráfico, onde acaba incentivando e estimulando outras praticas ilegais como tráfico de drogas e armas, onde esperamos realmente conscientizar uma parcela da população de todos os possíveis crimes causados com o tráfico dos pássaros silvestres.
Descargas
Citas
FRISCH, JD Aves Brasileiras 1989 São Paulo, Dalgas Ecoltec Ecologia Técnica 351p.
DUNNING J.S South American Birds 1989.
SICK, H Birds in Brasil 1993.
GRANTSAU, R. Os Beija-flores 1988.
SICK, H . Ornitologia Brasileira. 1997 Rio de Janeiro, Ed Fronteira. 912p. Meio Ambiente Agora 2011. Disponível em: http://meioambienteagora.com.br. Acesso em: 4 de Agosto de 2011.
Natureba vegetarismo 2011. Disponível em: http://www.natureba.com.br/trafico-animais-silvestres.htm. Acesso em: 3 de Agosto de 2011.
O que é um animal silvestre 2011 disponível em: http://www.wwf.org.br/informacoes/questoes_ambientais/animais_silvestres/. Acesso em: 3 de Agosto de 2011. http://www.ibama.gov.br/fauna-silvestre/wp-content/files. Acesso em: 9 de Agosto de 2011
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
