Balneário praia das areias brancas de Rosário do Sul/RS: um olhar da educação ambiental
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084593Keywords:
Bathing, Fecal coliformsAbstract
Because water is a vital part in the development and maintenance of all life forms in the terrestrialbiosphere, realizes the importance of this resource, given that life probably originated in this way.. This study's main objective reading an analysis of the water quality of the Spa White SandsBeach, in Rosario do Sul order conditions and recreation facilities without causing harm to thepopulation. The bathing site was evaluated by results of analysis of water collected by FEPAM theperiod 2007/2008. It was found that levels of contamination found were small, not affecting the bathing site. Through a questionnaire administered to the surrounding residents, it was found thatthe majority is aware of the current situation and what procedures should be taken or maintainedin good condition to keep the spa.
Downloads
References
BALARINE, OFO (org). Projeto Rio Santa Maria, PUC-RS. Porto Alegre, 1999.
BARLOW, Maude; CLARKE, Tony. Ouro Azul. São Paulo: M. Books do Brasil, 2003.
BERNARDI, Ronaldo. A água e os rios. Publicação de acordo em ação civil pública proposta pelo ministério público do estado de São Paulo, 1998.
BOURSCHEID, Engenharia Ltda. Programa de recuperação e desenvolvimento da Bacia Hidrográfica do rio Santa Maria. Governo do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul- Secretaria das obras públicas, saneamento Habitação. Porto Alegre, 1997.
BRAGA, Benedito. Introdução à Engenharia Ambiental. São Paulo: Prentice Hall, 2002.
CORSON, Walter H. Manual Global de Ecologia: o que você precisa fazer a respeito da crise do meio ambiente. São Paulo: AUGUSTUS, 1996.
CRH-RS. Conselho de Recursos Hídricos do Rio Grande do Sul e comitê de Gerenciamento da Bacia do Rio Santa Maria. Porto Alegre, 2000.
FEPAM, Fundação Estadual de Proteção Ambiental Henrique Luiz Roessler. Disponível em: http://www.fepam.rs.gov.br/qualidade/balnearios_rhuruguai.asp. Acesso em: 5 de Setembro de 2008.
LEAL, Alzira Elaine Melo; SOUZA, Carlos Eduardo Gerson de Souza. Construindo o conhecimento pela pesquisa: Orientação básica pra elaboração de trabalhos científicos. Santa Maria: Sociedade Vicente Pallotti, 2006.
MOTA, Suetônio. Introdução à Engenharia Ambiental. Rio de Janeiro: Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, 2000.
OLIVEIRA, L. Mergulho na água. Superinteressante, (n°37). São Paulo: Abril, 1990.
PHILIPPI JR., Arlindo. Saneamento, Saúde e Ambiente: fundamentos para um desenvolvimento sustentável. Barueri, São Paulo: Manole, 2005.
PHILIPPI JR., Arlindo; ROMÉRO, Marcelo de Andrede; BRUNA, Gilda Collet. Curso de Gestão Ambiental. Barueri, São Paulo: Manole, 2004.
PINTO-COELHO, Ricardo Motta. Fundamentos em Ecologia. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2000.
REFATTI, Thales. Licenciamento Ambiental: Avaliação do Balneário São Simão, Município deCacequi, RS, Brasil. Estudo de Caso. 2006.
SOUZA, Nara Miranda. Subsídio de Orientação, assim é Rosário do Sul. Gráfica Sara, 1996.
RICKLEFS, Robert E. A Economia da Natureza. 5.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2003.
SPERLING, Marcos Von. Introdução à Qualidade das Águas e no Tratamento de Esgotos. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2000.
TORTORA, Gerard J.; FUNKE, Berdell R.; CASE, Christine L. Microbiologia. 6.ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2000.
MADIGAN, Michael T.; MARTINKO, John M.; PARKER, Jack. Microbiologia de Brock. São Paulo: Prentice Hall, 2004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
