Mudanças comportamentais que visam ao desenvolvimento sustentável
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084225Keywords:
Desenvolvimento sustentável, Meio ambiente, Conscientização, Mudança comportamentalAbstract
The "Architects of Knowledge" is developed in the Rural School Dr. Honorato de SouzaSantos- Cachoeira do Sul /RS, aimed at elementary school students, aiming at the approach ofbasic education to higher education, from social technologies, workshops environmental andstudy visits. Search from environmental education, citizenship and agroecology to promote highereducation and science education in the life story of children integrated into the project. Theenvironmental education practices refer to the concept of symmetry discursive, and dialoguesthrough prioritizes social inclusion of students in the educational process, where the themes arecross-curricular school, covering topics in the areas of various disciplines. These practices aim atactions that seek to reflect the environmental and social situation through different activities, inorder to offer and share with the students educational and scientific tasks addressingsustainability. Based on the view proposed by the environment and cross-cutting theme inpractical action, encouraging discovery, thinking, creating, experimentation and debate in class,seeking learner autonomy through criticality to be developed, which can lead it to anenvironmental rationality.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: terceiro e quarto ciclos:
apresentação dos temas transversais, p.. 187, 189-190. Brasília: MEC/SEF, 1998.
JACOBI, Pedro. Educação Ambiental, Cidadania e Sustentabilidade. In: Cadernos de Pesquisa n. 118, p. 191-198, mar. 2003. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/cp/n118/16834.pdf. Acesso em: 25 jul. 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
