O negro como personagem na literatura infantil, na obra de Maria Rita Py
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083971Palavras-chave:
Africanidade, Autoestima, Resgate da história oral das crianças negras, Herança cultural, Multiculturalismo, Identidade cultural, CidadaniaResumo
Procurou-se ao analisar nas obras da Coleção História da Vó Preta, da autora santa-mariense Maria Rita Py, a representação do negro, demonstrando como as questões que o envolvem na sociedade, seus anseios, mágoas, vividas desde o século passado, estão presentes na literatura infantil contemporânea. A literatura tem evidenciado uma preocupação cada vez maior em apresentar uma identidade cultural que expresse as relações de inclusão social. A realidade brasileira mostra que o negro, após a libertação dos escravos, e mais recentemente com o crescimento do movimento negro assumiu uma nova visão, criando um novo discurso nessa literatura, quando passa a ser personagem da transformação da consciência negra. Neste contexto que se insere a literatura negra de Maria Rita, dedicadas ao público infantil, destaca-se a preocupação em buscar soluções para resolver os problemas dos seus personagens tais como: frustração, rejeição, desejo de ser branco, dúvidas e os anseios de crianças negras na sociedade, mas que afetam a auto-estima e a sua identidade.
Downloads
Referências
BERNDT, Zilá. Introdução à Literatura Negra. SP, Editora Brasiliense, 1988.
COELHO, Nelly Novaes. Panorama histórico da Literatura Infantil, Juvenil. SP, Editora Ática, 1991.
GOUVÊA, Maria Cristina Soares. Imagem do Negro na Literatura Brasileira. SP. Educação e Pesquisa, 2005.
MUNANGA, Kabengele. Superando o Racismo na Escola. Brasília, Editora MEC, 2005.
SILVA, Terezinha Juraci Machado da. Estereótipos sobre a Inferioridade do Negro na Literatura. Trabalho Acadêmico, 1988.
TEUN, A. Van Dijk. Racismo e discurso na América Latina. SP, Editora Contexto, 2008.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
