The negro as character in literature children on the work of Maria Rita Py
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083971Keywords:
African, Self-esteem, Cultural heritage, Multiculturalism, Cultural Identity, CitizenshipAbstract
Tried to when analyzing the works of Coleção História da Vó Preta, of the Santa Mariense author Maria Rita Py, the representation of black people, showing how the issues surrounding it in society, his yearnings, sorrows, lived since last century , are present in contemporary children's literature. The literature has shown an increasing concern in presenting a cultural identity that expresses the relationship of social inclusion. The Brazilian reality shows that the black, after the liberations of slaves, and most recently with the growth of the black movement, assumed a new vision, creating a new discourse in this literature, when passing to be personage of the transformation of black spirit (sense). It is in this context that the black literature of Maria Rita Py inserts, dedicated to child audience, search for solutions to solve the problems of this personage such as frustration, rejection, desire to be white, doubts and anxieties of children black in society, affect self-esteem and identity
Downloads
References
BERNDT, Zilá. Introdução à Literatura Negra. SP, Editora Brasiliense, 1988.
COELHO, Nelly Novaes. Panorama histórico da Literatura Infantil, Juvenil. SP, Editora Ática, 1991.
GOUVÊA, Maria Cristina Soares. Imagem do Negro na Literatura Brasileira. SP. Educação e Pesquisa, 2005.
MUNANGA, Kabengele. Superando o Racismo na Escola. Brasília, Editora MEC, 2005.
SILVA, Terezinha Juraci Machado da. Estereótipos sobre a Inferioridade do Negro na Literatura. Trabalho Acadêmico, 1988.
TEUN, A. Van Dijk. Racismo e discurso na América Latina. SP, Editora Contexto, 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
