O uso da língua inglesa como ferramenta de ensino e aprendizagem na educação ambiental: uma experiência na Escola Agostinha Dill- Condor, RS

Authors

  • Alexandra Freitas de Mello Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS
  • Paulo Edelvar Corrêa Peres Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083927

Keywords:

Environmental Education, Games, Playful activities, English language

Abstract

This paper presents the main results of the Specialization Monograph of the Sensu Lato Post graduate Course on Environmental Education, edition held in 2008 and 2009 by Federal University of Santa Maria in Panambi. This paper aims to use the English language as a tool for sensitization and changes in attitudes in the teaching of environmental education with students from Escola Estadual de Ensino Médio Agostinha Dill Condor/RS, using playful tools, games and activities, to promote environmental education, as well as to verify the knowledge in the school population about environmental issues, and also promote activities, with students in English classes, related to the environment. To supply the proposed goals, bibliographical studies, questionnaires to check the students’ knowledge, and also materials used to sensitize them to wards environmental education, such as videos and informational texts, games and practical activities, were done. The results show that the environmental education used in a school background, brings benefits and knowledge needed to students, which have the main purpose the sustain ability of the planet.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANDRADE, D. F. Implementação da Educação Ambiental em escolas: uma reflexão. In: Fundação Universidade Federal do Rio Grande. Revista Eletrônica do Mestrado em Educação Ambiental, v. 4.out/nov/dez 2000.

ALMEIDA FILHO, J. C. P. de. Dimensões comunicativas no ensino de línguas. Campinas, São Paulo: Pontes, 1993.

ANTUNES, C. Jogos para a estimulação das múltiplas inteligências. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 1999.

BIZERRIL, M. X. A. FARIA, D. S. Percepção de professores sobre educação ambiental no ensino fundamental. Disponível em <http://www.rbep.inep.gov.br> Acesso em 15/11/2010.

BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: terceiro e quarto ciclos: apresentação dos temas transversais. Brasília: MEC/SEF, 1998. 436 p.

DIAS, G. F. Educação Ambiental: princípios e práticas. São Paulo, Gaia, 1992.

FREIRE, P. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à pratica educativa. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1996.

JACOBI, P. Educar para a sustentabilidade: complexidade, reflexividade, desafios In: Revista Educação e Pesquisa, vol. 31/2 mai/ago 2005, F-USP.

PASSERINO, L. M. Disponível em:http://www.c5.cl/tise98/html/trabajos/jogosed/index.htm. Acesso em: 03/07/2010.

PONTALTI, E. S. Projeto de Educação Ambiental: Parque Cinturão Verde de Cianorte. Disponível me: http://www.apromac.org.br. Acesso em: 20/03/2008.

REGO, T. C. Vygotsky: uma perspectiva histórico-cultural da educação. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 1995.

REVERBEL, O. Jogos teatrais na escola: atividades globais de expressão. São Paulo: Scipione, 1996. (Série: Pensamentos e Ação no Magistério)

RIBEIRO, L. E. P. Para casa ou para escola? São Paulo: Didática Paulista, 1999.

SANTA ROSA, N. S. Brinquedos e brincadeiras. São Paulo: Moderna, 2001. (Coleção arte e raízes).

SANTOS, S. M. P. dos. Brinquedoteca: sucata vira brinquedo. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas, 1995.

SANTOS, S. S. dos. The Strategic Language Learner- a construction that needs reconsideration. IN: ROTTAVA, L. ; LIMA, M. dos S. Lingüística aplicada: relacionando teoria e prática no ensino de línguas. Ijuí: Unijuí, 2004. p. 165-186.

SATO, M. Educação Ambiental. São Carlos: Rima, 2002.

VOLPATO, G. Jogo, brincadeira e brinquedo: Uso e significados no contexto escolar e familiar. Florianópolis, SC: Cidade Futura, 2002.

VYGOTSKY, L. S. A formação social da mente: o desenvolvimento dos processos psicológicos superiores. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.

ZANLUCHI, F. B. O brincar e o criar: as relações entre atividade lúdica, desenvolvimento da criatividade e educação. Londrina: O Autor, 2005.

Downloads

Published

2011-10-11

How to Cite

Mello, A. F. de, & Peres, P. E. C. (2011). O uso da língua inglesa como ferramenta de ensino e aprendizagem na educação ambiental: uma experiência na Escola Agostinha Dill- Condor, RS. Monografias Ambientais, 4(4), 660–671. https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083927

Issue

REMOA, V. 4, N. 4, OUT., 2011

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.