Environmental Perception and Nursing Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130835026Keywords:
Environmental planning, Nursing Students, Environmental healthAbstract
The inseparability between health and the environment is essential for the better performance of nurses, still seen in training as a peripheral theme. The way the student perceives the environment indicates how it will act in relation to care for the environment and its impacts on the health of the population. The way the professional takes care of this environment depends on the environmental perception that it has of it. This is a descriptive case study with a qualitative approach. Overall objective: Identify the way nursing students perceive the environment. The semi-structured interview for data collection was used. The results indicated that the predominant environmental perception is reductionist, which may impact on its actions and responsibilities on this medium. It is necessary to overcome the reductionist perception, from the nursing graduation, sensitizing students to act responsibly with the environment in which they live and their actions to promote human health
Downloads
References
Backes MTS et al. Cuidado ecológico como um fenômeno amplo e complexo.Rev Bras Enferm. [Internet] 2011 [cited 2018 oct 03];64(5): 876. Available from: <http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reben/v64n5/a12v64n5.pdf>.
Bardin, L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições;2011 v. 70, p. 225, 1977.
Bruzos GAS et al. Meio ambiente e enfermagem: suas interfaces e inserção no ensino de graduação. Saúde Soc.[Internet] 2011 [cited 2018oct03];20(2):462-469. Available from: <http://www.scielo.br/pdf/sausoc/v20n2/17.pdf>
Camponogara S, Ramos FRS, Kirchhof ALC. A problemática ecológica na visão de trabalhadores hospitalares. Ciênc. Saúde Colet. [Internet] 2011 [cited 2017jul 26 ];16(8): 3561-3570. Available from:<http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232011000900024&lng=pt&nrm=iso>.
Cardoso FA ,Frenedozo RC, Araújo MST. Concepções de meio ambiente entre estudantes de licenciatura em ciências biológicas.RevBEA. [Internet] 2015 [cited 2016apr 23];10(2): 95-112. Available from: <http://www.sbecotur.org.br/revbea/index.php/revbea/article/viewFile/4380/3006Acesso em:
DictoroVP, Galvão, Davi F, HanaiFY. O estudo das representações sociais e da percepção ambiental como instrumentos de análise das relações humanas com a água. Ambiente & Educação [Internet] 2016 [cited 2017 apr 03];21,(1):232–251. Availablefrom:<https://www.seer.furg.br/ambeduc/article/view/6078>.
Evangelista JG,Flisch TMP, Pimenta, DN. A formação dos agentes de combate às endemias no contexto da dengue: análise documental das políticas de saúde. Rev Eletron. Comum. Inf. Inov. Saúde. . [Internet] 2017 [cited 2018 feb 10];11(1):01-13. Available from: .
Krzysczak FR. As diferentes concepções de meio ambiente e suas visões.Revista REI. [Internet] 2016 [cited 2017 apr 01];11(23):01-18. Available from: <https://www.ideau.com.br/getulio/restrito/upload/revistasartigos/355_1.pdf>.
Minayo, MCS. O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. 10th ed. São Paulo: Hucitec; 2014.
Peres RR et al. Saúde e ambiente: (in) visibilidades e (des) continuidade na formação profissional em enfermagem.Esc. Anna Nery Rev. Enferm.. [Internet] 2016 [cited 2017 apr 13];20(1):25-32. Available from: <http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ean/v20n1/1414-8145-ean-20-01-0025.pdf>.
Peres RRet al. Percepções de trabalhadores e estudantes atuantes em um pronto-socorro, sobre meio ambiente e saúde. REME rev. min. Enferm. [Internet] 2014 [cited 2016 sept 13];18,(1):34-40.Available from: <http://www.reme.org.br/artigo/detalhes/906>.
Romão LMVl, Maia ER, Albuquerque GA. Riscos ambientais: percepção dos enfermeiros da estratégia da saúde em áreas adscritas. Rev. enferm. UERJ.[Internet] 2014 [cited 2016 sep 08];22(2):264-270. Available from: <http://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/enfermagemuerj/article/view/13669/10459>.
Silva, RL et al. Concepções ambientais dos estudantes do curso de Licenciatura em Biologia da UFRB. Revista EA.[Internet] 2017 [cited 2017 apr 11];60. Available from: <http://www.revistaea.org/artigo.php?idartigo=2738>.
Yin RK. Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 3rd. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.