Challenges in practice the national pact literacy at the right age

Authors

  • Claudia Maria dos Santos Machado Universidade Federal do Pampa, São Gabriel, RS
  • Sebastião Ailton da Rosa Cerqueira Adão Universidade Federal do Pampa, São Gabriel, RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820637

Keywords:

PNAIC, Interdisciplinarity, Playfulness, No retention, School, Family

Abstract

The National Literacy Pact at the Certain Age approved in 2012 in Brazil, seeks to contribute to the literacy of all children up to the age of eight at the end of the 3rd year of elementary school. The Brazilian Department of Education since 2013 started including actions that contribute to literacy in language and mathematics, as well as presenting a major goal, the training of teachers for this new time. This article aimed to characterize the challenges faced by teachers from 1st to 3rd Years of the State Preparatory High School João Pedro Nunes in São Gabriel / RS. To develop this study, questionnaires, semi-structured interviews were conducted and applied addressing specifically the non-withholding, playfulness and interdisciplinary. Based on the results believed that some teachers need to review their practices and concepts regarding these issues, it is suggested steps to tackle with emphasis on continued training of literacy teachers. It is suggested that the school develop strategies that encourage family participation, to enable it to effectively fulfill its role as the basic training of any child.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Claudia Maria dos Santos Machado, Universidade Federal do Pampa, São Gabriel, RS

Possui graduação em Pedagogia pela Universidade Castelo Branco.

Sebastião Ailton da Rosa Cerqueira Adão, Universidade Federal do Pampa, São Gabriel, RS

Graduado em Administração pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, mestre em Administração (Políticas e Planejamento Universitário) pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, doutor em Educação (Administração e Supervisão do Ensino) pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas e Pós-doutor em Antropologia Social pela Universidade de São Paulo – USP.

References

ANTUNES, Celso. As inteligências múltiplas e seus estímulos. Campinas: Papirus, 2000.

BRASIL. Constituição Federal da República. Brasília: Presidência da República, 1988.

BRASIL. Ministério de Educação e Cultura. LDB - Lei nº 9394/96, de 20 de dezembro de 1996. Estabelece as diretrizes e bases da Educação Nacional. Brasília: MEC, 1996.

BRASIL. PCN - Parâmetro Curricular Nacional da Língua Portuguesa. Brasília: MEC, 1997.

BRASIL. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Parâmetros curriculares nacionais: introdução aos Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais/Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Brasília: MEC/SEF, 1997. 126p.

GARDNER, Howard. Estruturas da mente: a Teoria das Múltiplas Inteligências. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas, 1994.

GIL, Antonio Carlos. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. São Paulo: Atlas, 2002.

GIL, Antonio Carlos. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.

GODOY A.S.(1995).Introdução à pesquisa qualitativa e suas possibilidades. Revista de Administração de Empresas.

http://pacto.mec.gov.br/index.php Acesso em 20/07/2015

http://portalsme.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/Documentos/pme/Entendendo_Pacto.pdf. Acesso em 21/08/2015

http://www.direcionaleducador.com.br/edicao-80-set/11/reprovacao-escolar-uma-questao-muitas-facetas. Acesso em 22/08/2015.

http://citacoesacademicas.blogspot.com.br/2011/08/interdisciplinaridade-parametros.html. Acesso em 22/08/2015

MARCONI, Marina de Andrade; LAKATOS, Eva Maria. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.

MARQUES, Vera Regina Beltrão. História da Educação. Curitiba: IESDE Brasil, 2008.

Ministério da Educação, Secretaria de Educação Básica. Pacto nacional pela alfabetização na idade certa: formação de professores no pacto nacional pacto nacional pela alfabetização na idade certa. Brasília: MEC-SEB, 2012.

MORESI, E. (Organizador), Metodologia de Pesquisa. Universidade Católica de Brasília, 2003.

SARTORI, Jerônimo. Formação do professor em serviço. Da (re)construção teórica e da ressignificação da prática. Passo Fundo. UPF, 2013.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-07

How to Cite

Machado, C. M. dos S., & Adão, S. A. da R. C. (2015). Challenges in practice the national pact literacy at the right age. Monografias Ambientais, 14, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820637

Issue

REMOA, V.14, 2015, ESPECIAL EDITION: PÓS GRADUAÇÃO EM EDUCAÇÃO: INTERDISCIPLINARIDADE E TRANSVERSALIDADE – UNIPAMPA – CAMPUS DE SÃO GABRIEL – RS

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.