Sex Education in Science Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820432Keywords:
Teens, Sex education, SexualityAbstract
Sex Education in Science Education was the theme we have chosen to work in a Municipal School of St. Peter Cipa. The work has been started with the coordinator and science teacher at the School, who told us that this school related content sexuality was presented as a lecture. From the science teacher, were forwarded to the ninth graders to which we engage in the intervention. Initially, we conducted a dialogue twenty minutes with sixteen (16) students, arguing in a person's sexuality to work in the classroom. We conducted the dynamics of "secret box", which dealt each student asking your question on sexuality. After examining the questions and curiosities presented by the students, we return to this school for performing dialogic lecture, discussing issues about changes in the body, male and female internal sex organ, menstruation, ejaculation, types of sex, contraception and STDs in order to address the questions presented. After this lecture, we conducted socialization in dialogue the subject matter. Then apply evaluative questionnaire to ascertain. We note that the results of the questionnaire dialogic lecture helped to open dialogue and knowledge regarding sexuality and to help the teacher build a primer from the doubts raised by the students.Downloads
References
AQUINO, Camila, MARTELLI, Andréia Cristina. Escola e educação Sexual: uma relação necessária. Seminário de pesquisa em educação da região sul. Unoeste, 2012.
BERALDO, Flávia Nunes de Moraes. Sugestões práticas: sexualidade e escola: um espaço de intervenção. Psicóloga da Universidade São Francisco e docente da Unifenas, 2000.
BRAGA, Eliane Rose Maio. Sexualidade infantil: a importância da formação de professores (as) na questão de gênero. In: Educação no século XXI: Múltiplos desafios/ Sandra Regina Cassol Carbello, Sueli Ribeiro Comar (organizadoras). Maringá: Eduem, 2009.
BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: pluralidade cultural, orientação sexual. – 3. Ed. – Brasília: A Secretaria, 2001.
BARROSO, Maria Grasiela Teixeira. Dialogando com professores na escola sobre sexualidade e DST’s. Universidade Federal do Ceará, 2008.
CÉSAR, Maria Rita de Assis. Lugar de Sexo é na Escola? Sexo, Sexualidade e Educação sexual. In: Sexualidade; Secretaria de Estado da Educação.
Superintendência de Educação. Departamento de Diversidades. Núcleo de Gênero e Diversidade Sexual. Curitiba: SEED – Pr., 2009.
FREGUGLIA, J.; FONSECA, M. Mudanças na adolescência, 2009. Disponível em: <http://goo.gl/09eWqA>. Acesso 20/10/2013.
GASPAR, T.; MATOS, M. G.; GONÇALVES, A.; FERREIRA, M.; LINHARES, F.. Comportamentos Sexuais, conhecimentos e atitudes face ao HIV / SIDA em adolescentes migrantes. Psicologia, Saúde & Doenças, 7 (2), 299 – 316, 2006.
GUIMARÃES, Isaura. Educação Sexual na Escola: mito e realidade. Campinas, SP: Mercado de Letras, 1995.
JOCA, A. M. Educação escolarizada e diversidade sexual: problemas, conflitos e expectativa. In: COSTA, A. H. C.; JOCA, A. M.; LOIOLA, L. P. Desatando nós: fundamentos para a práxis educativa sobre gênero e diversidade Sexual. Fortaleza: Edições UFC, pp. 99-140, 2009.
LUDKE, Menga; ANDRÉ, Marli E. D. A. Pesquisa em Educação: Abordagens Qualitativas. São Paulo – SP: Pedagógica e Universitária, 1986.
NUNES, César Aparecido; SILVA, Edna. A educação sexual da criança. Campinas- SP: Autores Associados, 2000.
PAULA, Jaqueline Assis de, SANTOS, Lenir Medeiros dos. Sexualidade na escola: a necessidade de superar tabus. Formação Continuada. Lambarí d’Oeste-MT. Janeiro 2012.
QUIRINO, Josiane da Silva. Sexualidade na escola: encaminhamentos metodológicos na perspectiva dos professores de Ciências. 2013. Disponível em http://www.uel.br/pos/mecem/arquivos_pdf/QUIRINO_Josiane_dissertacao.pdf. Acesso 20/10/2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
