Environmental education beyond sustainable development

Authors

  • Endell Menezes Oliveira Universidade da Amazônia, Belém, PA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130819972

Keywords:

Environmental Education, Sustainable Development, Society

Abstract

This article discusses the perpasses of environmental education in the formation of sustainable development and its paradigms. Designates an overview of the human-society-nature relationship, spending on the atomization of knowledge into disciplines, and how this analogy affects the holistic view of nature as a whole. Noting that environmental education is in the playing field, and that the term sustainable development, it is wrong and mistake, in that its assumptions maintains the status quo of society, causing discrimination, abuse and accumulation of wealth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Endell Menezes Oliveira, Universidade da Amazônia, Belém, PA

Doutorando e Mestre em Educação em Ciências e Matemáticas na Universidade Federal do Pará. Graduação em Licenciatura Plena em Ciências Biológicas, Universidade da Amazônia. Representante da Sociedade Civil no Conselho Nacional de Juventude - Meio Ambiente, vinculado a Secretaria-Geral da Presidência da República (SNJ/SG/PR). Integrante do Projeto Banana-Terra/ Greenpeace Brasil e Anistia Internacional. Representante do Estado do Pará no Parlamento Nacional da Juventude pela Água (PNJA)/ Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH). Coordenador Geral do Coletivo Jovens de Meio Ambiente (CJ/PA).

References

CAMARGO, A. L. B. Desenvolvimento sustentável: Dimensões e desafios. Campinas: Papirus; 2003.

COSTA, F. A. As ciências, o uso de recursos naturais na Amazônia e a noção de desenvolvimento sustentável: por uma interdisciplinaridade ampla.In: VIEIRA, C. G. [et al] Diversidade Biológica e Cultural da Amazônia. Belém: Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi; 2009. p. 299-318.

DAL SOGLIO, F. K. Desenvolvimento, agricultura e agroecologia: qual o papel a ligação? In: GUERRA, D. A. D; WAQUIL, P. D. [Org.]Desenvolvimento rural sustentável no norte e sul do Brasil. Belém: Paka-Tatu, 2013. p. 197-226.

GUIMARÃES, M. Sustentabilidade e Educação Ambiental. In: CUNHA, S. B; GUERRA, A. J. T. A questão ambiental: diferentes abordagens. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil; 2009. p. 81-105.

LIMA, D; POZZOBON, J. Amazônia Socioambiental: sustentabilidade ecológica e diversidade social. In: VIEIRA, C. G. [et al] Diversidade Biológica e Cultural da Amazônia. Belém: Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi; 2009. p. 195-252.

LINDNER, E. L. Refletindo sobre o ambiente. In: LISBOA, C. P; KINDEL, E. A. I. [et al] Educação Ambiental: da teoria a prática. Porto Alegre: Mediação; 2012. p.13-20.

LOUREIRO, C.F.B. Sustentabilidade: Em defesa da educação ambiental no brasil. In: SILVA, M.L. Org. Políticas e práticas de educação ambiental na Amazônia: Das unidades de conservação aos grandes empreendimentos econômicos. Belém: UFPA; GEAM, 2014. p.13-27.

SILVA, L. M. R. O papel didático da crise da agricultura moderna para a compreensão da ascensão de um enfoque agroecológico. In: GUERRA, D. A. D; WAQUIL, P. D. [Org.]Desenvolvimento rural sustentável no norte e sul do Brasil. Belém: Paka-Tatu, 2013.p. 227-248.

Downloads

Published

2016-02-27

How to Cite

Oliveira, E. M. (2016). Environmental education beyond sustainable development. Monografias Ambientais, 15(1), 01–05. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130819972

Issue

REMOA, V. 15, N. 1, JAN.-APR., 2016

Section

EDUCATION, SOCIETY AND CULTURE

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.