The rural tourism In Panambi/RS

Authors

  • Denise Miriam Neumann Santos Museu e Arquivo Histórico de Panambi, Panambi, RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130818755

Keywords:

Tourism, Development, Sustainability

Abstract

This paper aims to observe and analyze the practices, options and possibilities of Rural Tourism, with the study of the municipality of locus Panambi / RS, located in the northwest of Rio Grande do Sul. In theoretical and methodological terms, there was a study the field, getting to know the existing rural tourism practices, as well as to map new possibilities. This research deals with the space issue, a result of the relationship nature and society, specific place, emphasizing the study of tourist options in the receiving space of the city of Panambi important issue given its importance and relevance in the socio-spatial context of this century, investigating the possibilities and alternatives for the development of rural tourism Panambi. Tourism needs to be reconciled with the agropastoral activities and be aware of the four pillars which it is based: being environmentally friendly, economically viable, socially just be and be truly rural. According Swarbrooke (2000), rural tourism can be called effectively for sustainable rural tourism when stimulating the understanding of the impacts that could result in the environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Denise Miriam Neumann Santos, Museu e Arquivo Histórico de Panambi, Panambi, RS

Trabalha no Museu e Arquivo Histórico Panambi/RS

References

CRUZ, Rita de Cássia Arizada. Introdução à geografia do turismo.2.ed. São Paulo: Roca, 2003.

CRUZ, Rita de Cássia. Política de Turismo e Território. 2 ed. São Paulo: Contexto, 2001.

NEUMANN, Rosane Márcia. Uma Alemanha em Miniatura: O Projeto de Imigração e Colonização Étnico Particular da Colonizadora Meyer no Noroeste do Rio Grande do Sul (1897-1932). Porto Alegre 2009. Dissertação (Doutorado). Programa de Pós-Graduação em História. PURCS, 2009.

PORTUGUEZ, Anderson Pereira – Agroturismo e desenvolvimento regional. São Paulo, Editora Hucitec, 1999.

PIRES, Paulo dos Santos. A paisagem rural como recurso turístico. In; RODRIGUES, Adyr B. (org.) Turismo Rural. São Paulo: Contexto, 2001.

RODRIGUES, Adyr Balastreri (org.) Turismo Rural: Práticas e Perspectivas. São Paulo: Contexto, 2001.

SWARBROOKE, J. Turismo sustentável: conceitos e impacto ambiental, v.1. tradução Margareth Dias Pulido. São Paulo: Aleph, 2000.

Downloads

Published

2015-07-09

How to Cite

Santos, D. M. N. (2015). The rural tourism In Panambi/RS. Monografias Ambientais, 14, 203–207. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130818755

Issue

REMOA, V.14, 2015, ESPECIAL EDITION: CURSO DE ESPECIALIZAÇÃO EM EDUCAÇÃO AMBIENTAL – UFSM – CAMPUS DE SANTA MARIA – RS

Section

ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATIVE PRACTICES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.