Bioconstruction: superadobe as sustainability vector

Authors

  • Josiane Pillar Hinning Instituto Federal Farroupilha, Panambi, RS
  • Denise Saad Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa maria, RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130818738

Keywords:

Bioconstruction, Superadobe, Permaculture

Abstract

This paper presents the research on the construction technique of Superadobe held in the Technical Course in Building, at the Federal Institute Farroupilha, Campus Panambi. The activity was developed during Discipline Comfort in Buildings. The bioconstruction method studied was the Superadobe. The construction technique was designed by the Iranian architect Nader Khalili, and consists of building with the soil from the spot, and with the help of other materials such as sand, plastic packaging among others. The research aims to support the development of a project of a residential typology, where the representation of the construction technique will be incorporated. It was also carried out a study on the concepts of permaculture, which combine different knowledge related to best practices that enable the creation of sustainable environments. Aspects of environmental comfort in buildings with superadobe were also searched. Through this activity, it was possible to enlarge the perceptions about the possibilities of materials and techniques with lower environmental impact, coming to meet the concepts of sustainability and environmental education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Josiane Pillar Hinning, Instituto Federal Farroupilha, Panambi, RS

Arquiteta e Urbanista, Especialista em Ed. Ambiental, Mestra em Patrimônio Cultural. Docente Técnico em Edificações do Instituto Federal Farroupilha, Campus Panambi.

Denise Saad, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa maria, RS

Engenheira Civil, Doutora em Engenharia Civil, Professora do Programa de Pós-Graduação Profissionalizante em Patrimônio Cultural, UFSM.

References

ANAIS do III Congresso Internacional de Educação Ambiental. ISSN: 2236-1154. 2014. Disponível em CD.

BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Secretaria de Extrativismo e Desenvolvimento RuralvSustentável. Departamento de Desenvolvimento Rural Sustentável. Curso de Bioconstrução. Texto elaborado por: Cecília Prompt - Brasília: MMA, 2008. 64 p.

BRASIL. Lei no 9.795, de 27 de abril de 1999.

BELANKO, Jorge. Bioconstrução - O Barro, as mãos, a casa / El barro, Las manos, La casa. 2013.

CALEARTH. Disponível em: http://calearth.org/. Acesso em: set. 2014.

CASATIERRA. Disponível em: http://www.casatierra.org.ar/act_2008-07-25.asp. Acesso em: set. 2014.

DIAS, Reinaldo. Gestão Ambiental: Responsabilidade social e sustentabilidade. São Paulo/SP. Atlas. 2010, p. 130-131.

LENGEN, Johan Van. Manual do arquiteto descalço. Editora Empório do Livro. São Paulo. 5ª Edição. 2014, pp. 536-537.

Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Disponível em: http://www.mma.gov.br/estruturas/sedr_proecotur/_publicacao/140_publicacao15012009110921.pdf Acesso em: set. 2014

MINKE, Gernot. Manual de Construção em terra. 2001.

Permacultura Principles. Disponível em: http://www.permacultureprinciples.com/pt/. Acesso em: set. 2014.

PROMPT, Cecília. Curso de Bioconstrução. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. 2008. Tibarose. Disponível em: http://www.tibarose.com/port/cursos.php. Acesso em: set. 2014.

Downloads

Published

2015-07-09

How to Cite

Hinning, J. P., & Saad, D. (2015). Bioconstruction: superadobe as sustainability vector. Monografias Ambientais, 14, 66–70. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130818738

Issue

REMOA, V.14, 2015, ESPECIAL EDITION: CURSO DE ESPECIALIZAÇÃO EM EDUCAÇÃO AMBIENTAL – UFSM – CAMPUS DE SANTA MARIA – RS

Section

ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATIVE PRACTICES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.