Planning and management of water resources: conceptual difficulties and of data compilation

Authors

  • Marcio Augusto Reolon Schmidt Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG
  • Marcio Ricardo Salla Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG
  • Maria Lígia Chuerubim Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG
  • Emiliano Silva Costa Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130814701

Keywords:

Planning and management of water resources, Computational tools, Data compilation, Interdisciplinarity

Abstract

The tools to support planning and management of water resources in the river basin scale suffered a huge breakthrough in the ability of decision-making in recent decades. The interdisciplinarity for the use of these tools requires several knowledge conceptual, whose technical manuals are targeted to professionals directly involved. Novice users have deficits knowledge in various areas such as river hydrology and GIS, which is the basis for discussion of this paper. Also were presented techniques for compiling and processing of rainfall data and quantity of surface water, so important as input data for mathematical models for planning and management of water resources. In any study of water intervention in river basin scale, the user must equip historical information that enables understanding the water balance and the characterization of water quality in the region and, from there, set predictions for sustainable use of water resources. At the same time, it is emphasized that the full use of the potential of a computational tool is possible only with the understanding of the technical manual.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marcio Augusto Reolon Schmidt, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG

Faculdade de Engenharia Civil; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; Área: Sistemas de Informações Geográficas

Marcio Ricardo Salla, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG

Faculdade de Engenharia Civil; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; Área recursos hídricos e saneamento ambiental

Maria Lígia Chuerubim, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG

Faculdade de Engenharia Civil; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; Área: Geoprocessamento

Emiliano Silva Costa, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG

Engenheiro Ambiental. Mestrando no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia.

References

BALATHANDAYUTHAM, K.; MAYILSWAMI, C. A semi-distributed water balance model for Walayar sub basin using SWAT model, International Journal of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 7(1), p. 198-202, 2014.

BHATT, G.; KUMAR, M.; DUFFY, C.J. A tightly coupled GIS and distributed hydrologic modeling framework. Environmental Modelling & Software. vol. 62, p. 70-84, december, 2014.

BRASIL. CONSELHO NACIONAL DO MEIO AMBIENTE. Resolução nº 357, de 17 de março de 2005. Disponível em: http://www.mma.gov.br/port/conama/legiabre.cfm?codlegi=459. Acesso em: 13 jun. 2014.

BRASIL. CONSELHO NACIONAL DO MEIO AMBIENTE. Resolução nº 430, de 13 de maio de 2011. Disponível em: http://www.mma.gov.br/port/conama/legiabre.cfm?codlegi=646. Acesso em: 13 jun. 2014.

CÂMARA, G., DAVIS, C.; MONTEIRO, A. M.V. Introdução à Ciência da Geoinformação. Instituto de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE), São José dos Campos, 2001. Disponível em: http://www.dpi.inpe.br/gilberto/livro/introd/. Acesso em: 13 jun. 2014.

CHAPRA, S.C., G.J. PELLETIER & H. TAO. QUAL2K: A Modeling Framework for Simulating River and Stream Water Quality, Version 2.11: Documentation and Users Manual. Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Tufts University, Medford, MA, 109 pp, 2008. Disponível em: http://epa.gov/athens/wwqtsc/html/qual2k.html. Acesso em: 13 jun. 2014.

CHEN, J.; WU Y. Advancing representation of hydrologic processes in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) through integration of the TOPographic MODEL (TOPMODEL) features. Journal of Hydrology, vol. 420-421, p. 319-328, february, 2012.

DOULGERIS, C.; GEORGIOU, P.; PAPADIMOS, D.; PAPAMICHAIL, D. Ecosystem approach to water resources management using the MIKE 11 modeling system in the Strymonas River and Lake Kerkini. Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 94, n. 1, p. 132-143, february, 2012.

FAN, C.; KO, C.H.; WANG, W.S. An innovative modeling approach using Qual2K and HEC-RAS integration to assess the impact of tidal effect on river Water quality simulation. Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 90, n. 5, p. 1824-1832, april, 2009.

FERRERO, V. O. Hidrología computacional y modelos del terreno. 2004. Disponível em: http://www.gabrielortiz.com/descargas/Hidrologia_Computacional_MDT_SIG.pdf. Acesso em: 11 maio 2014.

HANSEN, M. A. F. As práticas de campo em eventos de inundação com o apoio de informações espaciais. 2008. Disponível em: http://www.inpe.br/crs/crectealc/pdf/hansen.pdf. Acesso em:14 mar 2014.

HEC - Hydrologic Engineering Center. US Army Corps of Engineers.Davis, USA: Institute for Water Resources, 2014. Disponível em: http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/. Acesso em: 8 jul 2014.

HIDROTEC - Geração e transferência de tecnologia em recursos hídricos para o Estado de Minas Gerais. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa. Disponível em: http://www.hidrotec.ufv.br. Acesso em: 28 de nov. 2014.

MAMAQANI, A; KHORASANI, N.; TALEBI K.; HASHEMI, S.H.; RAFIEE G.; KHOSROSHAHI, F.B. Diazinon fate and toxicity in the tajan River (Iran) ecosystem. Environmental Engineering Science, vol. 28, p. 1-10, 2011.

MCKINNEYA, D. C. e CAI, X.. Linking GIS and water resources management models: an object-oriented method. Environmental Modelling & Software 17 (2002) 413–425

MOTA, S. Preservaçãoeconservaçãode recursoshídricos.2.ed.RiodeJaneiro:ABES, 1999.

MONICO, J. F. G. Posicionamento pelo GNSS: descrição, fundamentos e aplicações. 2ª Edição. São Paulo: UNESP, 476p., 2008.

NETTO, A., FERNANDEZ, M.F., ARAUJO, R., ITO, A.E. Manual de Hidráulica. 8ª edição atualizada. São Paulo: Edgard Blücher, 670p., 1998.

PAREDES-ARQUIOLA, J.; ÁLVAREZ, J.A.; SOLERA, A. A decision support system for water quality issues in the Manzanares River (Madrid, Spain). Science of the Total Environment, vol. 408, n. 12, p. 2576–2589, 2010.

SALLA, M.R., PEREIRA, C.E., ALAMY-FILHO, J.E., DE PAULA, L.M., PINHEIRO, A.M. Estudo da autodepuração do Rio Jordão, localizado na bacia hidrográfica do Rio Dourados. Revista Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, vol. 18, n. 2, p. 105-114, 2013.

SECHI, G.M.; SULIS, A. Water system management through a mixed optimization-simulation aprroach, Journal Water Resource Pl-Asce, vol. 135, n. 3, p. 160–170, 2009.

SULIS, A.; SECHI, G.M. Comparison of generic simulation models for water resource systems, Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 40, p. 214-225, february, 2013.

TUCCI, C. E. M. Hidrologia - Ciência e Aplicação. 3ª edição. Porto Alegre: UFRGS Editora, 943p., 2004.

VALENTE, J. A. Por quê o Computador na Educação? Campinas, SP: Gráfica Central da UNICAMP, 1993. Disponível em: http://www.ich.pucminas.br/pged/db/wq/wq1_LE/local/txtie9doc.pdf. Acesso em: 13 jun. 2014.

VIANNA, M.R. Hidráulica para engenheiros sanitaristas e ambientais. volume 1: Fundamentos. FUMEN/ FEA, 1ª edição, 2007.

VON SPERLING, M. Estudos e modelagem da qualidade da água de rios. Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Ed. UFMG, vol.7, 588 p, 2007.

XU, X.; HUANG, G.; ZHAN H.; QU, Z.; HUANG Q. Integration of SWAP and MODFLOW-2000 for modeling groundwater dynamics in shallow water table areas. Journal of Hydrology, vol. 412-413, p. 170-181, january, 2012.

YENILMEZ, F.; AKSOY, A. Comparison of phosphorus reduction alternatives in control of nutrient concentrations in Lake Uluabat (Bursa, Turkey): Partial versus full sediment dredging. Limnologica, vol. 43, p. 1-9, 2013.

ZHANG, X.; HUANG, G.H.; NIE, X.; LI. Q. Model-based decision support system for water quality management under hybrid uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, n. 3, p. 2809-2816, march, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-16

How to Cite

Schmidt, M. A. R., Salla, M. R., Chuerubim, M. L., & Costa, E. S. (2014). Planning and management of water resources: conceptual difficulties and of data compilation. Monografias Ambientais, 13(5), 3837–3846. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130814701

Issue

REMOA, V. 13, N. 5, DEZ., 2014

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.